I’ve been complaining about our immigration system for a long time – and through several Agency directors of both parties. I brought both written and oral testimony - through a client of mine - before a House subcommittee on the 1999 reauthorization bill - for what was then INS. The abuses of the system were aired and were well-known in 1999 – and before. While the specific abuses and individual problems, which I addressed to the Judiciary subcommittee, were quickly resolved, systematically little improved.
I was in Baltimore immigration court when workers came in with ladders and removed the photos of Bush and Cheney and replaced them with Obama. I was happy, thinking there’d be a great improvement. However, under Obama things grew worse. It’s not that government officials don't know the situation. They all know – Democrat and Republican, elected and non-elected. There is not one Senator or Congressman, federal or state judge, governor or POTUS, who doesn’t know the abuses of USCIS.
I share the frustration behind the May 3, 2021 article, but don't think an information campaign aimed at changing directors would help...even if it succeeded.
I have a pipe-dream: The Congress will enact laws (not administrative rules, but federal laws) that impose a time limit for USCIS to adjudicate each particular type of application.
This time-limit will be enforced by individual application - not conglomerated and averaged. The time-limit will be strictly enforced; that is, if the deadline is missed, the application is automatically granted. If the application is denied there will be a due process right to appeal. The appeal will have its own time-limit. Should the denial be overturned – or the appeal deadline missed by the government - there will be liquidated damages paid by the government to the wronged applicant.
In addition, when an application is made, the Agency will inform the applicant of the (real) name and (useable) contact information of the adjudicator, for the specific purposes of communication and transparency between applicant and adjudicator.
It's a pipe-dream of accountability.
So to return to your question: Malice or sloth? They're the same, when there's no accountability.
This website provides all the answers and questions that you may ever think. You can get all the primary information about how, what, why, and related queries on Query Beast. Also, if you are a fan of gaming and especially mobile or android gaming, then I have tested this site APK MODHUB personally. You can find hundreds of apk and mod versions of many android games.
Last edited by adamadam9120; 06-08-2022, 05:55 PM.
Tweet
I was in Baltimore immigration court when workers came in with ladders and removed the photos of Bush and Cheney and replaced them with Obama. I was happy, thinking there’d be a great improvement. However, under Obama things grew worse. It’s not that government officials don't know the situation. They all know – Democrat and Republican, elected and non-elected. There is not one Senator or Congressman, federal or state judge, governor or POTUS, who doesn’t know the abuses of USCIS.
I share the frustration behind the May 3, 2021 article, but don't think an information campaign aimed at changing directors would help...even if it succeeded.
I have a pipe-dream: The Congress will enact laws (not administrative rules, but federal laws) that impose a time limit for USCIS to adjudicate each particular type of application.
This time-limit will be enforced by individual application - not conglomerated and averaged. The time-limit will be strictly enforced; that is, if the deadline is missed, the application is automatically granted. If the application is denied there will be a due process right to appeal. The appeal will have its own time-limit. Should the denial be overturned – or the appeal deadline missed by the government - there will be liquidated damages paid by the government to the wronged applicant.
In addition, when an application is made, the Agency will inform the applicant of the (real) name and (useable) contact information of the adjudicator, for the specific purposes of communication and transparency between applicant and adjudicator.
It's a pipe-dream of accountability.
So to return to your question: Malice or sloth? They're the same, when there's no accountability.
Kay Leslie Ackman