Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Momi, can i eat a Gallup.....

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    hahaha

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    "tb" has transformed to the moronic guest "deport illegal aliens", I suspect!

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    tb is a winner here

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    tb
    BRAVO!!!
    WELL DONE

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Only 40% of what you wrote was worth responding to. Please quote some more rap stars, maybe even a movie star this time.

    "The mere fact that you've spent your precious time answering my thread inevitably shows otherwise. Tell me, who's grinding his sit right now?"

    What the hell is grinding his sit?

    "Currently there are 7 pro-immigration bills pending on both chambers of congress as opposed to 2 anti's. There are also 3 formal pro-immigration lobby groups in Congress. Anti-immigrant's you ask? None."

    FAIR and citizen's lobby, are just a FEW of anti-immigration lobby groups. You didn't look very hard.

    "In particular, the CSPA has been passed during the time when anti-ILLEGAL immigration sentiment WAS relative high. There is now a rising mood among practitioners that the CSPA has the potential to be the most significant immigration law ever passed in recent history. One old observer (Michael J. Gurfinkel, Esq) even commented that CSPA is "more than equal to 2 blanket amnesties" that we can expect the INS to make a very conservative interpretation - which is its usual practice- to "dilute the law".
    What kind of lawmaker or President would like to risk his political carreer by endorsing/ enacting a bill that he thinks run contrary to popular mandate by "registered voters and taxpayers" unless he's an idiot like you are.
    Recent steps that were undertaken after the WTC bombing specifically focuses on illegal immigrants using the pretext of existing laws that were previously unenforced by - who else- the INS."

    You cite Michael Gurfinkel as an authority. You are arguing that a claim is true based only on evidence that an authority figure accepts the claim. Next time pick an actual authority.

    I count 30 bills below. 15 pro, 15 against.

    Anti-Immigration bills
    HR 3525 HR 190 HR 957 HR 2712 HJ RES 59 HR3231 HR 5013 S 1627 S1518 HR 3077 HR 2975 HR 2965 HR 2928 S 1749 HR 4010

    Pro-Immigration bills
    HR 4037 HR 1291 S 1265 HR1918 HR531 HR500 HR348 HR 707 S 2444 HR562 HR1885 HR2736 S1161 HR1266 S955

    "Don't you wonder why those polls you mentioned and ALL SPOT POLLS, for this matter, are not even being mentioned on Stat Classes? Among other darn obvious reasons, it's because they don't contain "index factoring" and "stratification measures". The protocols they implement hide under the cloak of propritariness(????) and are not open for scholarly scrutiny. They are widely known to be subject to individual bias and easily affected by factors such as the WTC events. They have never been known as fit for law-making purposes and they're useful only for scaring people and awful substantiation of dumb smart reasoning you proudly possess."

    Spelling error aside, are you trying to invent a new word? (propritariness)

    Of course you would try and discredit these polls by casting doubt on the statistical method. This fallacy is known as poisoning the well. If you have some polls that support your position, and meet your statistical scrutiny, please share them. The fact of the matter is that there are many polls taken and most point toward the voter wanting less immigration. The poll taken by CBS news in January is another example. Congress does not seem to represent what the true population wants. Congress is influenced by the business lobby, which is in favor of more cheap immigrant labor. You would like the world to think that I am the minority, but there are many people that think like I do, and people that support those anti-immigration groups

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    watch usc run like girl

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Nice try TB

    Now we know who is the real TOP ACE on this board.
    USC, our man!

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Only 40% of what you wrote was worth responding to. Please quote some more rap stars, maybe even a movie star this time.

    "The mere fact that you've spent your precious time answering my thread inevitably shows otherwise. Tell me, who's grinding his sit right now?"

    What the hell is grinding his sit?

    "Currently there are 7 pro-immigration bills pending on both chambers of congress as opposed to 2 anti's. There are also 3 formal pro-immigration lobby groups in Congress. Anti-immigrant's you ask? None."

    FAIR and citizen's lobby, are just a FEW of anti-immigration lobby groups. You didn't look very hard.

    "In particular, the CSPA has been passed during the time when anti-ILLEGAL immigration sentiment WAS relative high. There is now a rising mood among practitioners that the CSPA has the potential to be the most significant immigration law ever passed in recent history. One old observer (Michael J. Gurfinkel, Esq) even commented that CSPA is "more than equal to 2 blanket amnesties" that we can expect the INS to make a very conservative interpretation - which is its usual practice- to "dilute the law".
    What kind of lawmaker or President would like to risk his political carreer by endorsing/ enacting a bill that he thinks run contrary to popular mandate by "registered voters and taxpayers" unless he's an idiot like you are.
    Recent steps that were undertaken after the WTC bombing specifically focuses on illegal immigrants using the pretext of existing laws that were previously unenforced by - who else- the INS."

    You cite Michael Gurfinkel as an authority. You are arguing that a claim is true based only on evidence that an authority figure accepts the claim. Next time pick an actual authority.

    I count 30 bills below. 15 pro, 15 against.

    Anti-Immigration bills
    HR 3525 HR 190 HR 957 HR 2712 HJ RES 59 HR3231 HR 5013 S 1627 S1518 HR 3077 HR 2975 HR 2965 HR 2928 S 1749 HR 4010

    Pro-Immigration bills
    HR 4037 HR 1291 S 1265 HR1918 HR531 HR500 HR348 HR 707 S 2444 HR562 HR1885 HR2736 S1161 HR1266 S955

    "Don't you wonder why those polls you mentioned and ALL SPOT POLLS, for this matter, are not even being mentioned on Stat Classes? Among other darn obvious reasons, it's because they don't contain "index factoring" and "stratification measures". The protocols they implement hide under the cloak of propritariness(????) and are not open for scholarly scrutiny. They are widely known to be subject to individual bias and easily affected by factors such as the WTC events. They have never been known as fit for law-making purposes and they're useful only for scaring people and awful substantiation of dumb smart reasoning you proudly possess."

    Spelling error aside, are you trying to invent a new word? (propritariness)

    Of course you would try and discredit these polls by casting doubt on the statistical method. This fallacy is known as poisoning the well. If you have some polls that support your position, and meet your statistical scrutiny, please share them. The fact of the matter is that there are many polls taken and most point toward the voter wanting less immigration. The poll taken by CBS news in January is another example. Congress does not seem to represent what the true population wants. Congress is influenced by the business lobby, which is in favor of more cheap immigrant labor. You would like the world to think that I am the minority, but there are many people that think like I do, and people that support those anti-immigration groups.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    quack! quack quack!

    it looks like tb just blew his top (tnx to USc)!

    quack! quack! quack!

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Keep waiting.

    Your moronic quote BLEW anything credible that you said. Maybe you can share other quotes from rap stars and singers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    I'm still waiting....

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    boss, is that all you can say? uscs waitin for you, boss...

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    " Where's your beef? Man, you're just wasting my time.... - Ja Rule"

    ANY credibility that you may have had is now gone. Anyone that would quote a foolish rap star in a debate is a fool and a loser. This isn't our first clue, merely the icing on the cake.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    oh my! tb whers your reply? dont' let usc have the last say.... REPLY!

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    can you make your bla bla any longer or do you want me to fall asleep right now?

    Leave a comment:

Sorry, you are not authorized to view this page

Home Page

Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Questions/Comments

SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily



Working...
X