Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

INA Section concerning Visa Overstay...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dev199108
    replied
    car reverse parking camera with display price in india

    Leave a comment:


  • Bushmaster
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by JermCool:
    BM - as I just did a security interview myself for a new job (which, afterward, I needed a shower as I felt rather violated), I don't know that you need to worry too much. The people conducting the background check will be able to determine that it wasn't a criminal offense and really, the investigator was just trying to establish that you were being honest in your interview. At least that's what I hope. I have a foreign spouse, foreign property, and previous credit problems. I should hope that wouldn't preclude me from having my clearance re-instated. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Hi Jerm, I was told that they do interviews with everyone who has foreign ties. My interview was only about 10 minutes. Though, I don't have foreign property or foreign ties, or a foreign spouse. If you are going for TS, yes, they are going to dig deeper. Goes 10 years back, you have to prove you have fixed the legal problems. You have to show and prove preference and loyalty to US compared to your foreign property. If you PM me, I can give you a link where you can ask some questions to "real" federal investigators, not posers as you can see in this thread. It is a BIG positive you held clearance before.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bushmaster
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by federale86:
    If you bothered to read my posts, I cited both federal criminal law as well as administrative sections of the INA that made you removeable.

    Of course, you still haven't provided the details on how you entered the U.S. fraudulently. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Do you know the federal penalty for impersonating a federal officer, too? Because not knowing how to spell basic words really speaks for your "federal" credibility. You don't establish credibility with screennames. Enough said for that. Unfortunately, you couldn't prove what you desperately wanted. First, you could not apply the cited law to my case. Second, you don't know the details as you finally admitted. Third, applicable law that makes one removable DOES NOT make that person "INADMISSIBLE". Fourth, since I was granted relief and adjustment of status by the INA, it has been proven that there was no fraudulent entry. Fifth, I have a favorable clearance decision.

    And after all this, if it still has not gone through your bonehead yet, take a chill pill and accept the reality that INA is interpreted than you wish it to be, and you sound like such a loser trying to beat that dead horse over and over again. We can do this forever.

    Leave a comment:


  • MakeItRight!
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by federale86:
    If you bothered to read my posts, I cited both federal criminal law as well as administrative sections of the INA that made you removeable.

    Of course, you still haven't provided the details on how you entered the U.S. fraudulently. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    go Back through the posts approx 3 Years. Is there. .

    Leave a comment:


  • federale86
    replied
    If you bothered to read my posts, I cited both federal criminal law as well as administrative sections of the INA that made you removeable.

    Of course, you still haven't provided the details on how you entered the U.S. fraudulently.

    Leave a comment:


  • JermCool
    replied
    BM - as I just did a security interview myself for a new job (which, afterward, I needed a shower as I felt rather violated), I don't know that you need to worry too much. The people conducting the background check will be able to determine that it wasn't a criminal offense and really, the investigator was just trying to establish that you were being honest in your interview. At least that's what I hope. I have a foreign spouse, foreign property, and previous credit problems. I should hope that wouldn't preclude me from having my clearance re-instated.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bushmaster
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by federale86:
    We don't know the facts of bushmaster's entry. He just said he entered with inspection. We don't know if he was admitted or paroled, if admitted, what classification, what he said to the INS Inspector. He is claiming there is no intent, well, that is an aspect that has to be proved in court, but he still commited the crime. And that is relevant to a security clearence in the Federal government. He claims there is no intent, but we don't have all the facts. Lets put him on a polygraph. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    What you need to know has been bashed to the ground already. If you understood immigration law just a tad, you would have been able to come up with what classification of visa and entry, after violation of its status, can adjust that status within the United States. How lame it is, you couldn't even provide a section of the law that applied in this case. Have you ever violated traffic laws and got fined for it? Yes you have and therefore you are a criminal, too. Only after a couple of months, you now realize that you don't have all the facts. Well the government does. The applicable federal application that has been filed in the matter of this case, in fact, has all the facts. Government does base its decision on this application, and the result is favorable. So you keep trolling, we have defense business to attend.

    Leave a comment:


  • federale86
    replied
    We don't know the facts of bushmaster's entry. He just said he entered with inspection. We don't know if he was admitted or paroled, if admitted, what classification, what he said to the INS Inspector. He is claiming there is no intent, well, that is an aspect that has to be proved in court, but he still commited the crime. And that is relevant to a security clearence in the Federal government. He claims there is no intent, but we don't have all the facts. Lets put him on a polygraph.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robin Horton
    replied
    Federale I have to agree with MakeItRight on this one. If he truly did it with intent then serving in the military will get him killed much faster than any deportation hearing.

    I think your the best Federale, and I thank God people such as you exist to protect the victims and the illegals who willfully break our law.

    Leave a comment:


  • MakeItRight!
    replied
    I Never Share Everything!!!

    federale86,
    Bushmaster Is not Of fraudulent Intent!!!
    Let Us concentrate On Those With Agenda! .

    Leave a comment:


  • federale86
    replied
    EWI is a crime brit, even if a Brit does it. See Title 8 United States Code Section 1324. Not just Chicos are wet, so are brits.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brit4064
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by federale86:
    Well, you broke the law and luckily avoided prosecution. It is an embarrassment that people like you are allowed into the Armed Forces.

    And, by the way, all illegals are criminals. Just there are so many of you that the criminal justice system cannot prosecute you all, so we have the deportation system for you. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    You're a embarrassment to all americans federale86. Are you prepared to put your life on the line in a war zone for your country? No, I highly doubt it. You're a pen-pusher sitting behind a desk with a big chip on your shoulder about illegal immigrants (probably all immigrants for that matter).

    Once and for all, if you bothered to read the INA, not all illegals are criminals!

    You are now on my ignore list.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bushmaster
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by federale86:
    Well, you broke the law and luckily avoided prosecution. It is an embarrassment that people like you are allowed into the Armed Forces.

    And, by the way, all illegals are criminals. Just there are so many of you that the criminal justice system cannot prosecute you all, so we have the deportation system for you. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    More bullsh*t! Yes, I did break the law, just like many stop signs and traffic lights you ran, speeding limits you didn't obey. While I am not justifying it, I came clean and went through all the necessary motions with good faith and this great country, without any zealot bigoted opinions and judgments, provided me relief THROUGH provision of the same LAW! That same country granted me citizenship through service to the country, some of which took place in a combat zone. It is more of an embarrassment that a so-called federal officer can't type correctly let alone producing a valid legal argument against the presented case here. While it is questionable that you are a federal officer, as you established no credibility whatsoever by your immature trolling, maybe for one last time your thick head would realize that I did go through that deportation system you mentioned a million times and I was granted relief. It is getting old that you parrot the same over and over again, dismissing the replies given to you. That is, again, called trolling if you are not aware of internet jargon.

    Leave a comment:


  • federale86
    replied
    Well, you broke the law and luckily avoided prosecution. It is an embarrassment that people like you are allowed into the Armed Forces.

    And, by the way, all illegals are criminals. Just there are so many of you that the criminal justice system cannot prosecute you all, so we have the deportation system for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brit4064
    replied
    I think he sees all illegals as criminals Bushmaster

    Leave a comment:

Sorry, you are not authorized to view this page

Home Page

Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Questions/Comments

SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily



Working...
X