Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New immigration bill--I need a lawyer input

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dev199108
    replied
    Global B2B Platform

    Leave a comment:


  • albatross23
    replied
    why not?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Lets all hope the bill never sees the light of day.

    Leave a comment:


  • albatross23
    replied
    okay..Thank you for the response...Do you think it will pass??..Do you know where i could read his amendment?

    Leave a comment:


  • Freedom1
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by albatross23:
    I have a friend that have asked me about the new immigration bill and i couldnt giver her a proper answer to her question, so i will ask the question here and see whether any immigration expert or lawyer could answer it.

    My friend question is, whether an immigrants that had previously apply for asylum,but never attended court hearing thus prompting the court to serve her deportation letter for absentia, would be able to be eligible under the probabtion and Z-visa.

    I tried to seek the answer by looking at the bill text and found this:

    --------
    Those with final orders of removal are ineligible if such removal orders are based on
    crimes or security issues. Individuals subject to a reinstatement of a deportation order are
    ineligible.
    -----------

    The way i read this text seems to suggest that she will be eligible if she was ordered deported because of absentia since she wasnt ordered deported based on crimes or security issues.Am i wrong on that?
    She had apllied for asylum, but because of family death, she did not attend the court hearing, and never left.

    Any lawyers that could answer this question? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I'm not a lawyer, but this is what I know:

    You should watch cspan tomorrow, Senator Cornyn from Texas is going to introduce an amendment that among other things would disqualify a person from receiving any benefit under the bill if the person is already in deportation proceedings or has been ordered deported.

    Freedom1.

    Leave a comment:


  • albatross23
    replied
    no answer to my question?

    Leave a comment:


  • sesaria
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Sundevilusa is not even a US ciizen and has no right to vote in this country, but he bashes immigrants like he </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


    To build himself up by putting someone down - oldest trick in a book, doesn't work, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • albatross23
    replied
    I have a friend that have asked me about the new immigration bill and i couldnt giver her a proper answer to her question, so i will ask the question here and see whether any immigration expert or lawyer could answer it.

    My friend question is, whether an immigrants that had previously apply for asylum,but never attended court hearing thus prompting the court to serve her deportation letter for absentia, would be able to be eligible under the probabtion and Z-visa.

    I tried to seek the answer by looking at the bill text and found this:

    --------
    Those with final orders of removal are ineligible if such removal orders are based on
    crimes or security issues. Individuals subject to a reinstatement of a deportation order are
    ineligible.
    -----------

    The way i read this text seems to suggest that she will be eligible if she was ordered deported because of absentia since she wasnt ordered deported based on crimes or security issues.Am i wrong on that?
    She had apllied for asylum, but because of family death, she did not attend the court hearing, and never left.

    Any lawyers that could answer this question?

    Leave a comment:


  • albatross23
    started a topic New immigration bill--I need a lawyer input

    New immigration bill--I need a lawyer input

    I have a friend that have asked me about the new immigration bill and i couldnt giver her a proper answer to her question, so i will ask the question here and see whether any immigration expert or lawyer could answer it.

    My friend question is, whether an immigrants that had previously apply for asylum,but never attended court hearing thus prompting the court to serve her deportation letter for absentia, would be able to be eligible under the probabtion and Z-visa.

    I tried to seek the answer by looking at the bill text and found this:

    --------
    Those with final orders of removal are ineligible if such removal orders are based on
    crimes or security issues. Individuals subject to a reinstatement of a deportation order are
    ineligible.
    -----------

    The way i read this text seems to suggest that she will be eligible if she was ordered deported because of absentia since she wasnt ordered deported based on crimes or security issues.Am i wrong on that?
    She had apllied for asylum, but because of family death, she did not attend the court hearing, and never left.

    Any lawyers that could answer this question?
Sorry, you are not authorized to view this page

Home Page

Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Questions/Comments

SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily



Working...
X