***XXOOO***X

[mike_2007]

.

[mike_2007]

.

[SonofMichael]

s c u m b a g is the only word I would use for these "people" that insult the dead on 9/11 with disgusting "theories" and obviously have no clue what they are talking about.

[SonofMichael]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by davdah:
I'll give the conspirators that WCC 7 dropped under very suspicious circumstances.

The real question is, where is the plane that hit the pentagon? Even in that two frame video there should have been some visual evidence of the aircraft blowing up on impact. There is a fireball but nothing indicative of what is hitting it. No wings sticking out. No tail section or segment of the long fuselage in either frame. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Fire "dropped" WTC 7. It is very obvious. Only the completely ignorant liars ignore the fact that there was a large fuel storage facility on-site and the impact of the collapsing WTC 1&2 severely damaged the structure as in an earthquake. There was another building, Merrill Lynch building, that was actually "bent" and there was fear of that collapsing on its own even without a fire.

Anyone who does not know how a camera works is an idiot. Anyone who does know how a camera works knows full well it is like a sequence of pictures; never capturing every moment but with enough frames gives an impression of motion. Security cameras rarely capture full sequences. This is observed in all the gritty 7-11 robberies.

Stupid people. Stupid immoral ideas.

[SonofMichael]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by davdah:
The fires in 7 weren't that severe. The oddity of it is how it went down. With even one or two main supports still intact it would have caused it to fall at an angle and not as if it were professionally demolished as it did. There wasn't an issue with fuel burn in 7. It was on top of an electrical power sub station. A relayer of electricity, not a producer.

The camera sequencing isn't so debatable as the lack of what should have been in the frames taken. The impact explosion of a plane that size should have revealed one of two things. If the frame were taken prior to full contact of the plane front to back there would be some amount of plane outside the impact zone.
If it were post full contact there would be a bulge of sorts of the compacted plane against the building and within the explosion zone. Neither of which were there. The amount of interior penetration indicates the plane stopped short of full entry. The second frame should have shown some amount of aircraft regardless the shutter timing with respect to the impact. Not to mention the wings, engines and other items which would have broken free initiating their own trajectories. It does look more like a tomahawk or harpoon missile hit than an airliner. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

The oddity is that you insist on talking about things you know nothing about. I have a degree in Physics. Regardles of what you think (if that word can be used), every rational person knows what happenned. I am not wasting a second arguing stupidity.

[SonofMichael]

In case you really are that stupid

[MakeItRight!]

As the world turns!!!
I Need a vacation!!!

[SonofMichael]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by iperson:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SonofMichael:

The oddity is that you insist on talking about things you know nothing about. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Not the first time either. I don't know why it took me so long to argue stupidity. It's as hopeless as trying to help Sprint.


And no, SOM is not Houston. I know. He really does live in Rhode Island. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Sprint is always nasty to me and doing bad things to people

[MakeItRight!]

I Want What everyone else Is Drinking!!!

[SonofMichael]

You really don't know the difference between a direct hit on a 110 story commercial building made from steel and an indirect hit on the second ring of a 5 ringed/5 story reinforced military command center? What does being a pilot have to do with ANYTHING related to this? Have you had that much experience crashing into various building types?

[Sprint_girl07]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">You always want the most transparent view of reality as it is, not as you wish it to be. I want to understand reality and have the most clear view in order to live a lucid real life, and be truly free </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

LMAO.. you do really? Honestly?

So reality is talking to an animal and asking him to bring you drinks in cyberworld? All that what you do is reality?? Real life?

What about those voices you hear in your head? Those dreams? Reality?

Of course everyone in this world are mad and stupid and live in a fantasy world, huh? Unlike you.

[Sprint_girl07]

I agree there is something in it, it doesn't add up about the Pentagon at all. I still have not seen enough evidence that it was a plane.
Why keep so much secret?

Was the black box really recovered? Or they just keeping it secret too.

[4now]

Davdah, I am impressed that you are opening your mind and pondering things these days. I remember only not long ago that you were against even thinking such.

Good 4 U.



http://discuss.ilw.com/eve/for...1/m/64810344741/p/19


Still waiting for you and Britt to explain the fair.ytail. and those wylie coyote marks

[SonofMichael]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mike_2007:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Fire "dropped" WTC 7. It is very obvious. Only the completely ignorant liars ignore the fact that there was a large fuel storage facility on-site and the impact of the collapsing WTC 1&2 severely damaged the structure as in an earthquake </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
hahahah what an idiot you are, the scientist and the engineers and some of the goverment officials and the exeperts (and you are not one of them) are telling us its a big lie. not even a 9.9 earthquake would have collapse the building. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Actually, moron, I am a Scientist. I did not say an earthquake alone collapsed 7. It contributed to it. In addition to the fire. In addition to the large amount of stored fuel. In addition to the inability to reach the fire. In addition to damage done from the falling towers. there were multiple causes that is obvious even to a non-scientist. You are a fool and an idiot.

[SonofMichael]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Sprint_girl07:
I agree there is something in it, it doesn't add up about the Pentagon at all. I still have not seen enough evidence that it was a plane.
Why keep so much secret?

Was the black box really recovered? Or they just keeping it secret too. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Another idiot speaks. Crawl back in your hole dirtbag.

Or should I say crawl back in your dirtbag you hole?