I know, OldE. It's absurd to say the least, that something that doesn't even exist has to be proven as such. Do we also have to prove that $%#^& and *(&%$# and #@$%^& don't exist too?
On top of that, to add a little twist to an already absurd situation is that I need to battle a logical fallacy of argumentum ad populum, on which a theist mind relies as the basis for god's existence, beyond f.airytales. It is the only argument feasibly acceptable that the whole theistic theory is based on, because there can be no other, and yet is it an utter fallacy.
I agree with you that there is much we don't know, and there is a power of life, larger than we can ever understand.
But that power has no approximately personal or any type of connection to us, nor will we ever have a connection to "it" in any sense. This is an indisputable fact, as logic supports it. In order for free life to exist, there cannot be any ties between different levels of existence in a consequential universe.
God's existence means an elimination of free will altogether, absolute control and limits on existence, and its evolutionary free process. His existence would basically introduce an element of chaos and subvert any chances for life to exist.
In order for life to exist, it must be free of a human God.
</div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Don't tell me things i knew when you wre running through under the table without lowering your head, iperson

Of psychological fallacy of too human habit of projection of things inherent to the person to those outside of it i am aware of too well

You too have a good one.
Leave a comment: