Tweet
hi,
USCIS has denied my I 140 application based on - not enough proof
of complete buyout/merger/acquisition.
my case is something like this, I would like to get your opinion on this
please help
- I was working for a startup at company A, where they files for my RIR
labor cert in Aug 2001
- Company B acquired patent and hired part of compny A. basically compnay sold its patent and main developer to B in oct 2003. I xfered H1 to new comany B. Company A still leaglly exitsts but purpose it just to fight a litigation filed on A from its old competitor. There are no business operations
and facilty for A. Currently there is only one emplyee, cEO on A. we developing same product as in patent and A dose not intent to develop that
- I got my labor with filed from A in Nov 2003. I filed I 140 from company B.
- Now USCIS has sent a indent of deial, according to them this is not complete buyout/merger/acquisition as company A still exits in record and
B has not taken all resposibilite/liablities
- Now lawer is trying to prepare a response, therefor I would like to request you all if anybody has similar situation, what should I respond. what should be written to ins to convince them that though A is legally there but for only its leagl fight.
What are the next steps, please help.
- Is there other way to use this labour - is there something like this, that A can surrender labout to B and then I can file again. Can they surrender based on the fact that they dont need and persona and skills in A.
I will be really very greatful for your insight.
regards,
-nano
USCIS has denied my I 140 application based on - not enough proof
of complete buyout/merger/acquisition.
my case is something like this, I would like to get your opinion on this
please help
- I was working for a startup at company A, where they files for my RIR
labor cert in Aug 2001
- Company B acquired patent and hired part of compny A. basically compnay sold its patent and main developer to B in oct 2003. I xfered H1 to new comany B. Company A still leaglly exitsts but purpose it just to fight a litigation filed on A from its old competitor. There are no business operations
and facilty for A. Currently there is only one emplyee, cEO on A. we developing same product as in patent and A dose not intent to develop that
- I got my labor with filed from A in Nov 2003. I filed I 140 from company B.
- Now USCIS has sent a indent of deial, according to them this is not complete buyout/merger/acquisition as company A still exits in record and
B has not taken all resposibilite/liablities
- Now lawer is trying to prepare a response, therefor I would like to request you all if anybody has similar situation, what should I respond. what should be written to ins to convince them that though A is legally there but for only its leagl fight.
What are the next steps, please help.
- Is there other way to use this labour - is there something like this, that A can surrender labout to B and then I can file again. Can they surrender based on the fact that they dont need and persona and skills in A.
I will be really very greatful for your insight.
regards,
-nano
Comment