Tweet
Originally posted by klinus:
To be candid, highly intelligent, yes. Knowing how to use the quote system, no.
Thanks proud USC - just saw your posting after posting this.
Changing the posts is usually to correct glaring typos.
This response is mostly for 4now, in acknowledgment of her recognition of the Stones spoof and the awesome slimy nuke (btw how do I paste a word document with a inserted picture into the board?)
Would things make a difference if it was known that she was originally sent back to Canada since it was not working, and she went off the pill and I get a call saying "you is daddy"? Marriage in May child born August. Religious and cultural background make an abortion out of the question but lets be clear that this was closer to shotgun than "her prince charming, her best friend, her lifelong companion" as in abortion was not an option and I was not going to abandon my child (son as it later turned out to be)
For three years she had a parasite's wet dream, the USC husband who took care of living expenses and did all the care of the son, including physician visits, speech therapy appointment etc. etc. and a biyearly visit back to Canada. Then she blew it, despite the warning signs (separate bedrooms etc. etc.) by insisting on taking the little boy to Canada, just after he had had a simultaneous adnectomy and myringotomy for her nephew's wedding, right at the cusp of her date for removing CPR. (not too swift, I know but hey ...) The only sure shot way to guarantee his stay in the US was the Court Order that automatically keeps him within the State that accompanies the divorce petition. This is what triggered the divorce; again, cultural and religious reasons would have kept me in the sham that the marriage was. Also, for the record, I was unaware of the penalties around driving until I went to the police station to report her vandalism of the house and they asked me what her driving license number and I said she did not have a (CA) license that they said that I should be grateful, since the penalty is a month's impoundment of the vehicle, an impound fee of $200 and a tow fee of $1800
While I initially thought that the reason for the reason for her to go to the shelter was to claim abused spouse for immigration purposes, I now know that the reason was to claim child abuse so as to get sole custody and the concomitant child support with it. She took her *** story to an immigrant priest at our local parish, who not only wrote her a $7500 check towards her attorney's fees but also got her a spot at a shelter that this parish runs along with several other Churches. This, BTW, is why she is still at the shelter for 4 months despite the rebuttal of the abuse by Family Courts. In continuation of the not too swift nature of my wife, she made sure that I got a copy of the check (nah nah nah)
Being a fairly religious person who has seen the defilement of the Church in the media, I asked the Church as to why they made this ex-parte decision to side with a non-parishioner against a parishioner. Said priest invited me to "pursue this civilly". Given that there is already plenty of that, to the tune of over a Billion $ over the past 20 years, I simply googled the list of all journalists who have published 2 or more negative articles about priest pedophilia. Rather than deal with over a 1000 reporters, I simply passed the story on to the local publication. The ensuing story resulted in the s**t hitting the fan, particularly with the local parishioners who were real pissed about the flagrant misuse of their contributions. The Bishop was pissed, especially since he knew nothing about this. I see a posting in Kosovo, Beijing or Darfur in said priest's not too distant future.
Somebody asked the question about her being a good mother. Let me offer the following facts: (1) She tried to browbeat the child's pediatrician into calling CPS for child abuse after being educated about the procedures about reporting child abuse by the local police (who also introduced her to the concept of 911) while my son was squirming and itching from scabies (2) took him to an emergency room at 11:00 p.m. on a Friday night in part of an East Bay city that I would avoid in daylight for a differential diagnosis of Fleas, not Scabies (3) refuses to allow him to be seen by a neurologist despite a referral from his pediatrician etc. Hey Hudson, if you are reading this, now you see why I say that between his normal routine care and fixing the innumerable routine pestilences from the shelter and discovering his latest development disorder, I simply do not have the bandwidth to alienate my son from his mother. However, it is a fact that when he is with his father, he's back in the home that he has been all his life, he has his own bed, he is safe and not being bitten, and when dad drops him off at the police station dad parks his car right in front of the police station, rather than Mom who does not want to be captured on the police video driving him in violation of the Court order.
To be candid, highly intelligent, yes. Knowing how to use the quote system, no.
Thanks proud USC - just saw your posting after posting this.
Changing the posts is usually to correct glaring typos.
This response is mostly for 4now, in acknowledgment of her recognition of the Stones spoof and the awesome slimy nuke (btw how do I paste a word document with a inserted picture into the board?)
Would things make a difference if it was known that she was originally sent back to Canada since it was not working, and she went off the pill and I get a call saying "you is daddy"? Marriage in May child born August. Religious and cultural background make an abortion out of the question but lets be clear that this was closer to shotgun than "her prince charming, her best friend, her lifelong companion" as in abortion was not an option and I was not going to abandon my child (son as it later turned out to be)
For three years she had a parasite's wet dream, the USC husband who took care of living expenses and did all the care of the son, including physician visits, speech therapy appointment etc. etc. and a biyearly visit back to Canada. Then she blew it, despite the warning signs (separate bedrooms etc. etc.) by insisting on taking the little boy to Canada, just after he had had a simultaneous adnectomy and myringotomy for her nephew's wedding, right at the cusp of her date for removing CPR. (not too swift, I know but hey ...) The only sure shot way to guarantee his stay in the US was the Court Order that automatically keeps him within the State that accompanies the divorce petition. This is what triggered the divorce; again, cultural and religious reasons would have kept me in the sham that the marriage was. Also, for the record, I was unaware of the penalties around driving until I went to the police station to report her vandalism of the house and they asked me what her driving license number and I said she did not have a (CA) license that they said that I should be grateful, since the penalty is a month's impoundment of the vehicle, an impound fee of $200 and a tow fee of $1800
While I initially thought that the reason for the reason for her to go to the shelter was to claim abused spouse for immigration purposes, I now know that the reason was to claim child abuse so as to get sole custody and the concomitant child support with it. She took her *** story to an immigrant priest at our local parish, who not only wrote her a $7500 check towards her attorney's fees but also got her a spot at a shelter that this parish runs along with several other Churches. This, BTW, is why she is still at the shelter for 4 months despite the rebuttal of the abuse by Family Courts. In continuation of the not too swift nature of my wife, she made sure that I got a copy of the check (nah nah nah)
Being a fairly religious person who has seen the defilement of the Church in the media, I asked the Church as to why they made this ex-parte decision to side with a non-parishioner against a parishioner. Said priest invited me to "pursue this civilly". Given that there is already plenty of that, to the tune of over a Billion $ over the past 20 years, I simply googled the list of all journalists who have published 2 or more negative articles about priest pedophilia. Rather than deal with over a 1000 reporters, I simply passed the story on to the local publication. The ensuing story resulted in the s**t hitting the fan, particularly with the local parishioners who were real pissed about the flagrant misuse of their contributions. The Bishop was pissed, especially since he knew nothing about this. I see a posting in Kosovo, Beijing or Darfur in said priest's not too distant future.
Somebody asked the question about her being a good mother. Let me offer the following facts: (1) She tried to browbeat the child's pediatrician into calling CPS for child abuse after being educated about the procedures about reporting child abuse by the local police (who also introduced her to the concept of 911) while my son was squirming and itching from scabies (2) took him to an emergency room at 11:00 p.m. on a Friday night in part of an East Bay city that I would avoid in daylight for a differential diagnosis of Fleas, not Scabies (3) refuses to allow him to be seen by a neurologist despite a referral from his pediatrician etc. Hey Hudson, if you are reading this, now you see why I say that between his normal routine care and fixing the innumerable routine pestilences from the shelter and discovering his latest development disorder, I simply do not have the bandwidth to alienate my son from his mother. However, it is a fact that when he is with his father, he's back in the home that he has been all his life, he has his own bed, he is safe and not being bitten, and when dad drops him off at the police station dad parks his car right in front of the police station, rather than Mom who does not want to be captured on the police video driving him in violation of the Court order.
Well, lets take a couple of your premises, shall we:
1) You said, things weren't working out, she went home, and then got pregnant. Your premise is that it is all her fault for getting pregnant, getting married, and now the divorce. So, why were the two of you not working out? And what were you afraid of culturally and religiously to agree to such a marriage (that means a shotgun marriage)? Additionally, she cold have had the child and you paid child support. But I suspect that you either want the child or not all person.
2) You alluded to that she was a leach on the marriage. For this premise to be accurate, she would have to had agreed to such and not want to work. But of course, you being the man wanted to do all the work and she was just the poor, dumb housewife. Neither can be proven in court to any great degree and I have a feeling this is what the court is wrestling with is your intent from the beginning as well as hers.
3) You said that she made false child abuse claims. I understand and respect your belief that there was no child abuse. But as I have repeated myself, a denied TRO is not indicative of guilt or innocence of said abuse, even if the TRO was granted. That is how the law works.
4) The parish will not drop her onto the streets simply because of a denied TRO, Klinus. You must be aware of that. Were will she go? To your home where she does not trust you? All you want is for her to get on the street so that she can be deported and give you sole custody of the son. Is that your intent?
5) I am still waiting for said article, Klinus.
6) She was foolish in demanding the pediatrician to report child abuse. But so are you with your attempts. And all for "the love of the child?" But none of this is indicative of her being a bad mother, well at least not yet. But this does show your malicious, insipid, indiscriminate, and unpalatable way you have described her. You wanted the marriage knowing that she would do something stupid or will not know your true intent because she is probably naive. JMO.
Comment