Announcement

**4now** · 12-29-2007, 04:21 AM

Good Job proud. I apologize. I just mentioned that no one had posted any reference to the assasination other than Bev mentioning it. but here you were on the job and I missed it.

here is another interesting and related story. and unfortunately a disappoointing revelation from the reporter that received the email.

Bhutto Sent Blitzer Security E-Mail
By DAVID BAUDER,AP
Posted: 2007-12-28 13:45:56

NEW YORK (AP) - It was a story CNN's Wolf Blitzer hoped he'd never have to report - an e-mail sent to him through an intermediary by Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto complaining about her security. Conditions of use: only if she were killed.

Bhutto, who was assassinated on Thursday, wrote to Blitzer that if anything happened to her, "I would hold (Pakistani President Pervez) Musharraf responsible."

Blitzer received the e-mail on Oct. 26 from Mark Siegel, a friend and longtime Washington spokesman for Bhutto. That was eight days after she narrowly escaped another attempt at her life.

Bhutto wrote to Blitzer that "I have been made to feel insecure by his (Musharraf's) minions," that specific improvements had not been made to her security arrangements, and that the Pakistani leader was responsible.

Blitzer agreed to the conditions before receiving the e-mail. <span class="ev_code_BLUE">He said Friday that he called Siegel shortly after seeing it to see if there was any way he could use it on CNN, but was told firmly it could only be used if she were killed.</span> Siegel couldn't say why she had insisted on those conditions.

Blitzer reported on the e-mail late Thursday.

He noted that Bhutto had written a piece for CNN.com that mentioned her security concerns and that American politicians had tried to intervene on her behalf to make her feel safer.

"I didn't really think that it was a story we were missing out on," he said. "I don't think the viewers were done any disservice by my trying to hold on to this."

Blitzer was the only journalist sent such a message, Siegel said. He also sent the e-mail to U.S. Rep. Steve Israel, a New York Democrat .

Siegel said he did not believe Bhutto's opinions had changed since she wrote the e-mail. Her message specifically mentioned she had requested four police vehicles surrounding her vehicle when traveling; Siegel said it seemed evident from pictures taken at the assassination scene that the request wasn't fulfilled.

Bhutto did not necessarily believe that Musharraf wanted her dead, but felt many people around him did, he said.

Her husband contacted Siegel on Thursday to remind him about the e-mail message and to make sure it got out, he said.

Blitzer said he had no regrets about the way he handled the story. To report about it while she was still alive would have meant going back on his word, he said.

"I don't think there is a clear black-and-white in this situation," he said. "I did what I think was right."

http://news.aol.com/entertainment/story/_a/bhutto-sent-...20071228134509990011

Hey it would be great if someone would start a "World news " Thread on the board. After all There are people on this board from all over the world that may like to post in it news worthy articles . Would very much like to see whats going on from the perspective of the other immigrants from other countries. Not just what CNN decides to report.

Explora and Beverly posting on illegal immigration topic... even though the views are 180, it gives a more balanced picture of the situation and a more realistic perspective of how things really are.

You too do good work proud

**mike_2007** · 12-29-2007, 04:58 AM

ok u got it,,mr.1 arm pushup will start the world news from tom,,,i have a great web to get all the good news,,better than cnn..lol...c u guys tom..good night ,,bco iam getting the flu and i just feel really sick...cold and shaking and lonely,, gatta go to bed...good night everybody

**ProudUSC** · 12-29-2007, 06:20 AM

Thanks, 4Now

. I like your idea of a World News thread.

**ProudUSC** · 12-29-2007, 07:00 AM

U.S. fears spillover into Afghanistan

Bhutto assassination may mark start of extremist offensive, officials worry

A blow to U.S. war on terrorism
Dec. 28: The assassination of Benazir Bhutto is a major setback for U.S. policymakers such as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice who strongly supported her return to Pakistan. NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports.
Nightly News

updated 7:14 p.m. PT, Fri., Dec. 28, 2007
President Bush held an emergency meeting of his top foreign policy aides yesterday to discuss the deepening crisis in Pakistan, as administration officials and others explored whether Thursday's assassination of opposition leader Benazir Bhutto marks the beginning of a new Islamic extremist offensive that could spread beyond Pakistan and undermine the U.S. war effort in neighboring Afghanistan.

U.S. officials fear that a renewed campaign by Islamic militants aimed at the Pakistani government, and based along the border with Afghanistan, would complicate U.S. policy in the region by effectively merging the six-year-old war in Afghanistan with Pakistan's growing turbulence.

"The fates of Afghanistan and Pakistan are inextricably tied," said J. Alexander Thier, a former United Nations official in Afghanistan who is now at the U.S. Institute for Peace.

U.S. military officers and other defense experts do not anticipate an immediate impact on U.S. operations in Afghanistan. But they are concerned that continued instability eventually will spill over and intensify the fighting in Afghanistan, which has spiked in recent months as the Taliban has strengthened and expanded its operations.

Unrest in Pakistan and increasing fuel prices have already boosted the cost of food in Afghanistan, making it more likely that hungry Afghans will be lured by payments from the Taliban to participate in attacks, a U.S. Army officer in Afghanistan said.

In a secure videoconference yesterday linking officials in Washington, Islamabad and Crawford, Tex., Bush received briefings from CIA Director Michael V. Hayden and U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan Anne W. Patterson, said National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe. Bush then discussed Bhutto's assassination and U.S. efforts to stabilize Pakistan with his top foreign policy advisers, including Vice President Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley, as well as Adm. William J. Fallon of Central Command and Marine Gen. James E. Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

U.S. intelligence and Defense Department sources said there is increasing evidence that the assassination of Bhutto, a former Pakistani prime minister, was carried out by al-Qaeda or its allies inside Pakistan. The intelligence officials said that in recent weeks their colleagues had passed along warnings to the Pakistani government that al-Qaeda-related groups were planning suicide attacks on Pakistani politicians.

The U.S. and Pakistani governments are focusing on Baitullah Mehsud, leader of the Taliban Movement of Pakistan, as a possible suspect. A senior U.S. official said that the Bush administration is paying attention to a list provided by Pakistan's interior ministry indicating that Mehsud's targets include former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, former interior minister Aftab Khan Sherpao, and several other cabinet officials and moderate Islamist leaders. "I wouldn't exactly call it a hit list, but we take it very seriously," the official said. "All moderates [in Pakistan] are now under threat from this terrorism."

Mehsud told the BBC earlier this month that the Pakistani government's actions forced him to react with a "defensive jihad."

After signing a condolence book for Bhutto at the Pakistani Embassy in Washington, Rice said the United States is in contact with "all" of the parties in Pakistan and stressed that the Jan. 8 elections should not be postponed. "Obviously, it's just very important that the democratic process go forward," she told reporters.

The U.S. Embassy in Pakistan warned U.S. citizens Thursday to keep a low profile and avoid public gatherings. A Pentagon official said plans to evacuate Americans from the country are being reviewed.

"We've really got a new situation here in western Pakistan," said Army Col. Thomas F. Lynch III, who has served in Afghanistan and with Central Command, the U.S. military headquarters for Pakistan and the Middle East. He said the assassination marks a "critical new phase" in jihadist operations in Pakistan and predicted that the coming months would bring concentrated attacks on other prominent Pakistanis.

"The Taliban . . . are indeed a growing element of the domestic political stew" in Pakistan, said John Blackton, who served as a U.S. official in Afghanistan in the 1970s and again 20 years later. He noted that Pakistani military intelligence created the Taliban in Afghanistan.

How the United States responds will hinge largely on the actions of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, in whom U.S. officials have mixed confidence. If there is indeed a new challenge by Islamic militants emerging in Pakistan, then the United States will have to do whatever it can to support Musharraf, the U.S. Army officer in Afghanistan said.

˜Pakistan must take drastic action'
"Pakistan must take drastic action against the Taliban in its midst or we will face the prospect of a nuclear weapon falling into the hands of al-Qaeda "” a threat far more dangerous and real than Hussein's arsenal ever was," he said, referring to the deposed Saddam Hussein.

But Musharraf has a track record of promising much to Washington but doing little to counter the militants, others said. "My prediction is, Musharraf will go into a bunker mentality and be nicer to the Muslims," said John McCreary, who led the Defense Intelligence Agency's 2001 task force on Afghanistan. "He goes through the pretenses of crackdown but never follows through."

"Pakistan isn't really engaged in a fight against terror," added Blackton. "One of the mistakes amongst many U.S. policymakers is to project the American construct of a war on terror onto the Pakistani regime struggle for survival. There are some congruencies between the two, but even more differences."

The clever move for Musharraf would be to allay such doubts by capturing or killing a major Islamic extremist leader in the coming weeks, said Larry P. Goodson, an area expert who teaches strategy at the U.S. Army War College. But he said he doubts that would happen or that Musharraf would take many concrete actions, aside possibly from declaring a new state of emergency.

A countervailing pressure on Musharraf is that if he does not respond effectively to an Islamic militant campaign against his government, he also could face falling from power. At some point, said Teresita C. Schaffer, a former State Department official specializing in India and Pakistan, the Pakistani army "could conclude that he's a liability."

**explora** · 12-29-2007, 07:26 AM

Explora and Beverly posting on illegal immigration topic... even though the views are 180, it gives a more balanced picture of the situation and a more realistic perspective of how things really are.

It had been implicitly understood that the IME and HU threads were continued on by me. If a particular theme is started within the thread it can broken by other postings. Not to mention duplications of an article. HU had been running only with significant busts and raids whereas a viewer would know of something new occurring. Beverly doesn't like illegals invading the U.S. so she began invading all the threads only out of disrespect. Nobody but her. It's been suggested to me to open a new topic for every article that would've been dropped into these threads. With the amount of articles dropped into IME vs HU it would do nothing but push other topics downward.

If that's what it takes then so be it. Not to mention dropped elsewhere. Maybe they have a good idea there.

**Beverly** · 12-29-2007, 11:36 AM

Originally posted by explora:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Explora and Beverly posting on illegal immigration topic... even though the views are 180, it gives a more balanced picture of the situation and a more realistic perspective of how things really are.

It had been implicitly understood that the IME and HU threads were continued on by me. If a particular theme is started within the thread it can broken by other postings. Not to mention duplications of an article. HU had been running only with significant busts and raids whereas a viewer would know of something new occurring. Beverly doesn't like illegals invading the U.S. so she began invading all the threads only out of disrespect. Nobody but her. It's been suggested to me to open a new topic for every article that would've been dropped into these threads. With the amount of articles dropped into IME vs HU it would do nothing but push other topics downward.

If that's what it takes then so be it. Not to mention dropped elsewhere. Maybe they have a good idea there. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Typical IA mentality, whine, whine. . .tantrums immaturity and lack of respect for anyone whose opinion differs from yours and the exposure of the other side of a very serious issue. When I signed on to this PUBLIC MESSAGE FORUM for the record there is nothing written in the rules that IMPLICITLY FORBIDS ANYONE FROM POSTING in all threads primarily posted in by the screen name "Explora". Sorry, since its not in writing, nor do you hold a patent on this website that delusional proclamation only exists in your mind. Therefore, your claims are nothing less than your personal assumptions, delusions of grandier and more importantly a moot point.

You disrupted this entire board to draw attention to your tantrum because I posted in a thread you claimed as your own after usurping it from THE ORIGNAL AUTHOR. You created unnecessary chaos by deliberately placing jumbo tron pictures in every single one of the threads I started out of spite, and simply because you disagreed with the articles that exposed the negative effects of the illegal alien invasion that systematically destroyed your warm and fuzzy view point of the illegal aliens whom you coincidentally(?) share a race and a nationlist loyalty.

Had you pretended that you were a mature and somewhat rational person and deleted those JUMBO pictures, which I asked you to do respectfully on several occasions you would no longer be stuck on stupid and whining about the chaos you initiated almost a week ago. You chose to ignore my request (which pictures BTW are still in every single one of the threads I created) which is why I have chosen (as warned) to post opposition stories that can be VIEWED without the interruption of your SPAM.

Here you are almost a week later, still whining and doing all that you can to get my attention, annoy me and reduce me to your mental midget one dimensional level. There would have been no further altercation nor a reason for you to create 99 threads personally attacking me and failing miserably at trying to discredit and embarrass me had you compromised, and done the right thing by removing your SPAM.

For the record you don't have the mental capacity or capability of accomplishing either, as evidenced by the fact that your tantrums and lack of cooperation and refusal to compromise netted you nothing more than self defeat.

I'm still here and find it pretty amusing when you post pictures of yourself and your les-bian girlfriend kissing and other juvenile tactics that merely serve to exhibit your immense level of immaturity, and desperate desire for my attention. For the record you are only succeeding at exposing a couple of things: (a) your'e a le-sbian; (b) you have the maturity level of a 12 year old and (c) you are stuck on stupid in 3rd world mental midget status.

I realized a while back that copying and pasting articles in a thread on a message board is your biggest accomplishment in life and part of your desperate pursuit of recognition and validation while attempting to boost your low self esteem.

If you weren't such a dimb bulb you would have realized that mentally I am way ahead of you and more than capable of beating you at your own game. That's why I decided to sit back and enjoy watching you beat yourself at your own little game. I knew that you would not SPAM your biggest contribution to society (a thread on somebody else's message board), therefore, as I forewarned, I proceeded posting the truth in a thread that you delusionally consider your personal masterpiece on this very public message board. Hopefully, you now realize that you have absolutely no power over me or my ability to exercise my 1st Amendment right. If you wish to limit the opinion of others, your best avenue is to create a personal blog that will afford you the privilege of dictatorship and banning anyone who disagrees with your one dimensional ranting. Otherwise, you need to accept the reality that you are merely another poster on someone else's message board.

Here's hoping that one day those of you who are ignorant, lawless, and disrepectful of others rights, and opinions learn that your one dimensional emotional and mental immaturity and your culturally embedded third world debilitating mentality will never be globally tolerated nor acceptable.

**Beverly** · 12-29-2007, 12:21 PM

That being said, Back to REAL issues:

4-Now what do you think of similarities/parallels of the political histories of the Bhuttos and the Kennedys?:

Obituary: Benazir Bhutto

Ms Bhutto had a volatile political career

BBC interviews Bhutto
Benazir Bhutto followed her father into politics, and both of them died because of it - he was executed in 1979, she fell victim to an apparent suicide bomb attack.
Her two brothers also suffered violent deaths.

Like the Nehru-Gandhi family in India, the Bhuttos of Pakistan are one of the world's most famous political dynasties. Benazir's father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, was prime minister of Pakistan in the early 1970s.

His government was one of the few in the 30 years following independence that was not run by the army.

Born in 1953 in the province of Sindh and educated at Harvard and Oxford, Ms Bhutto gained credibility from her father's high profile, even though she was a reluctant convert to politics.

She was twice prime minister of Pakistan, from 1988 to 1990, and from 1993 to 1996.

Stubbornness

On both occasions she was dismissed from office by the president for alleged corruption.

The dismissals typified her volatile political career, which was characterised by numerous peaks and troughs. At the height of her popularity - shortly after her first election - she was one of the most high-profile women leaders in the world.

Young and glamorous, she successfully portrayed herself as a refreshing contrast to the overwhelmingly male-dominated political establishment.

But after her second fall from power, her name came to be seen by some as synonymous with corruption and bad governance.

Asif Zardari has faced numerous corruption charges

The determination and stubbornness for which Ms Bhutto was renowned was first seen after her father was imprisoned by Gen Zia ul-Haq in 1977, following a military coup. Two years later he was executed after a much criticised trial on charges of conspiring to murder a political opponent.

Ms Bhutto was imprisoned just before her father's death and spent most of her five-year jail term in solitary confinement. She described the conditions as extremely hard.

During stints out of prison for medical treatment, Ms Bhutto set up a Pakistan People's Party office in London, and began a campaign against General Zia.

She returned to Pakistan in 1986, attracting huge crowds to political rallies.

After Gen Zia died in an explosion on board his aircraft in 1988, she became one of the first democratically elected female prime ministers in an Islamic country.

Corruption charges

During both her stints in power, the role of Ms Bhutto's husband, Asif Zardari, proved highly controversial.

He played a prominent role in both her administrations, and has been accused by various Pakistani governments of stealing millions of dollars from state coffers - charges he denies, as did Ms Bhutto herself.

Many commentators argued that the downfall of Ms Bhutto's government was accelerated by the alleged greed of her husband.

None of about 18 corruption and criminal cases against Mr Zardari has been proved in court after 10 years. But he served at least eight years in jail.

He was freed on bail in 2004, amid accusations that the charges against him were weak and going nowhere.

Ms Bhutto also steadfastly denied all the corruption charges against her, which she said were politically motivated.

She faced corruption charges in at least five cases, all without a conviction, until amnestied in October 2007.

President Pervez Musharraf granted Ms Bhutto and others an amnesty

She was convicted in 1999 for failing to appear in court, but the Supreme Court later overturned that judgement.

Soon after the conviction, audiotapes of conversations between the judge and some top aides of then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif were discovered that showed that the judge had been under pressure to convict.

Ms Bhutto left Pakistan in 1999 to live abroad, but questions about her and her husband's wealth continued to dog her.

She appealed against a conviction in the Swiss courts for money-laundering.

During her years outside Pakistan, Ms Bhutto lived with her three children in Dubai, where she was joined by her husband after he was freed in 2004.

She was a regular visitor to Western capitals, delivering lectures at universities and think-tanks and meeting government officials.

Army mistrust

Ms Bhutto returned to Pakistan on 18 October 2007 after President Musharraf signed into law an ordinance granting her and others an amnesty from corruption charges.

Observers said the military regime saw her as a natural ally in its efforts to isolate religious forces and their surrogate militants.

She declined a government offer to let her party head the national government after the 2002 elections, in which the party received the largest number of votes.

In the months before her death, she had emerged again as a strong contender for power.

Some in Pakistan believe her secret talks with the military regime amounted to betrayal of democratic forces as these talks shored up President Musharraf's grip on the country.

Others said such talks indicated that the military might at long last be getting over its decades-old mistrust of Ms Bhutto and her party, and interpreted it as a good omen for democracy.

Western powers saw in her a popular leader with liberal leanings who could bring much needed legitimacy to Mr Musharraf's role in the "war against terror".

Unhappy family

Benazir Bhutto was the last remaining bearer of her late father's political legacy.

Her brother, Murtaza - who was once expected to play the role of party leader - fled to the then-communist Afghanistan after his father's fall.

From there, and various Middle Eastern capitals, he mounted a campaign against Pakistan's military government with a militant group called al-Zulfikar.

He won elections from exile in 1993 and became a provincial legislator, returning home soon afterwards, only to be shot dead under mysterious circumstances in 1996.

Benazir's other brother, Shahnawaz - also politically active but in less violent ways than Murtaza - was found dead in his French Riviera apartment in 1985.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2228796.stm

**ProudUSC** · 12-29-2007, 07:33 PM

Originally posted by Beverly:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by explora:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Explora and Beverly posting on illegal immigration topic... even though the views are 180, it gives a more balanced picture of the situation and a more realistic perspective of how things really are.

It had been implicitly understood that the IME and HU threads were continued on by me. If a particular theme is started within the thread it can broken by other postings. Not to mention duplications of an article. HU had been running only with significant busts and raids whereas a viewer would know of something new occurring. Beverly doesn't like illegals invading the U.S. so she began invading all the threads only out of disrespect. Nobody but her. It's been suggested to me to open a new topic for every article that would've been dropped into these threads. With the amount of articles dropped into IME vs HU it would do nothing but push other topics downward.

If that's what it takes then so be it. Not to mention dropped elsewhere. Maybe they have a good idea there. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Typical IA mentality, whine, whine. . .tantrums immaturity and lack of respect for anyone whose opinion differs from yours and the exposure of the other side of a very serious issue. When I signed on to this PUBLIC MESSAGE FORUM for the record there is nothing written in the rules that IMPLICITLY FORBIDS ANYONE FROM POSTING in all threads primarily posted in by the screen name "Explora". Sorry, since its not in writing, nor do you hold a patent on this website that delusional proclamation only exists in your mind. Therefore, your claims are nothing less than your personal assumptions, delusions of grandier and more importantly a moot point.

You disrupted this entire board to draw attention to your tantrum because I posted in a thread you claimed as your own after usurping it from THE ORIGNAL AUTHOR. You created unnecessary chaos by deliberately placing jumbo tron pictures in every single one of the threads I started out of spite, and simply because you disagreed with the articles that exposed the negative effects of the illegal alien invasion that systematically destroyed your warm and fuzzy view point of the illegal aliens whom you coincidentally(?) share a race and a nationlist loyalty.

Had you pretended that you were a mature and somewhat rational person and deleted those JUMBO pictures, which I asked you to do respectfully on several occasions you would no longer be stuck on stupid and whining about the chaos you initiated almost a week ago. You chose to ignore my request (which pictures BTW are still in every single one of the threads I created) which is why I have chosen (as warned) to post opposition stories that can be VIEWED without the interruption of your SPAM.

Here you are almost a week later, still whining and doing all that you can to get my attention, annoy me and reduce me to your mental midget one dimensional level. There would have been no further altercation nor a reason for you to create 99 threads personally attacking me and failing miserably at trying to discredit and embarrass me had you compromised, and done the right thing by removing your SPAM.

For the record you don't have the mental capacity or capability of accomplishing either, as evidenced by the fact that your tantrums and lack of cooperation and refusal to compromise netted you nothing more than self defeat.

I'm still here and find it pretty amusing when you post pictures of yourself and your les-bian girlfriend kissing and other juvenile tactics that merely serve to exhibit your immense level of immaturity, and desperate desire for my attention. For the record you are only succeeding at exposing a couple of things: (a) your'e a le-sbian; (b) you have the maturity level of a 12 year old and (c) you are stuck on stupid in 3rd world mental midget status.

I realized a while back that copying and pasting articles in a thread on a message board is your biggest accomplishment in life and part of your desperate pursuit of recognition and validation while attempting to boost your low self esteem.

If you weren't such a dimb bulb you would have realized that mentally I am way ahead of you and more than capable of beating you at your own game. That's why I decided to sit back and enjoy watching you beat yourself at your own little game. I knew that you would not SPAM your biggest contribution to society (a thread on somebody else's message board), therefore, as I forewarned, I proceeded posting the truth in a thread that you delusionally consider your personal masterpiece on this very public message board. Hopefully, you now realize that you have absolutely no power over me or my ability to exercise my 1st Amendment right. If you wish to limit the opinion of others, your best avenue is to create a personal blog that will afford you the privilege of dictatorship and banning anyone who disagrees with your one dimensional ranting. Otherwise, you need to accept the reality that you are merely another poster on someone else's message board.

Here's hoping that one day those of you who are ignorant, lawless, and disrepectful of others rights, and opinions learn that your one dimensional emotional and mental immaturity and your culturally embedded third world debilitating mentality will never be globally tolerated nor acceptable. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

I can't understand why you spent the better part of your day concocting this post, but whatever floats your boat.

You were the one, Beverly, who started interrupting every single thread on this board! Don't blame Explora. Your intent was to storm on here with your anti-illegal rhetoric regardless of anyone's feelings. Guess what? You might have had a few followers when you signed on, but they're magically disappearing, aren't they? Take your anti-illegal $hit over to an anti-illegal board! You are not welcome here.

**Someone12** · 12-29-2007, 07:41 PM

news flash....proudusc does not control what is posted on this site....nor can proudusc recind the First Amendment...so, Beverly or myself will continue to post our anti-illegal immigration thoughts and opinions, and if you don't like it, too bad.....wimp.

**ProudUSC** · 12-29-2007, 07:43 PM

Read the posts, S12! I'll wait for you to catch up.

**Beverly** · 12-29-2007, 07:51 PM

Originally posted by Someone12:
news flash....proudusc does not control what is posted on this site....nor can proudusc recind the First Amendment...so, Beverly or myself will continue to post our anti-illegal immigration thoughts and opinions, and if you don't like it, too bad.....wimp.

Co-signing. That's the problem with third world descendants, and the reason their cesspool homelands are chaotic, lawless and one dimensional. They all share the same brain cell and speak with one tongue. They don't get to speak at all in the presence or earshot of the oligarchies in their homelands.

She must be having flashbacks from those marches when they thought millions of them and their anchor babies were marching and waiving that multicolored rag and chanting in espanol would intimidate Americans. Remember how the second time around they magically produced American flags and had someone make up signs in English when they knew dam-n well they had no idea what they said?

Is there such a thing as a brave coward, because they certainly are retreating at record speed.

Reading about the progress of the raids fills my heart with joy.

**ProudUSC** · 12-29-2007, 08:06 PM

She must be having flashbacks from those marches when they thought millions of them and their anchor babies were marching and waiving that multicolored rag and chanting in espanol would intimidate Americans. Reading about the progress of the raids fills my heart with joy. So much for false bravado.

Hello? I guess you have a reading comprehension problem, Beverly. Or, do you just post and not read responses? There is nothing Mexican about me or my ancestors - pure bred Caucasian! I just happen to be a bit more human than you are. And, probably alot happier!

**Beverly** · 12-29-2007, 08:09 PM

I can't understand why you spent the better part of your day concocting this post, but whatever floats your boat.

You were the one, Beverly, who started interrupting every single thread on this board! Don't blame Explora. Your intent was to storm on here with your anti-illegal rhetoric regardless of anyone's feelings. Guess what? You might have had a few followers when you signed on, but they're magically disappearing, aren't they? Take your anti-illegal $hit over to an anti-illegal board! You are not welcome here.

Beyotch puleeze, you read every word and it probably took you twice as long to read it than it took me to write it and you're still clueless.

News Flash: You nor your l-esbo buddy run this board. Therefore, you have two options, ignore my posts or learn to love them because for you this board will be reminescent of your life in Messyhole, miserable with you powerless to control any aspect of it or who posts here.

**Someone12** · 12-29-2007, 08:16 PM

and speaking of one's reading comprehension, tell us proudusc,,,,which posting of mine singled out Mexicans as the only 'unacceptable' illegal aliens? Which one? READ them all, wimp....and then please.....find just one....wimp

Announcement

Benazir Bhutto Shot and Killed After Political Rally

Benazir Bhutto Shot and Killed After Political Rally

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment