Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama nominates Racist to Supreme Court

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MakeItRight!
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by davdah:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Brit4064:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">It's a given she will. The radicals have taken over and the more different the nominee the more likely to be approved by the idiots in office. The selling out of our country has begun. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Hardly radical. Her record isn't one of extreme leftism. And she's one of 9 so it won't always go her way. Personally I think having some diversity on the Supreme Court is a good thing. After all, America isn't just made up of white men only. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>



    MIR, I have to disagree, She is a radical. By the mere mention that her being hispanic gives her an edge is racist by definition. Not limited to words but evidenced by deeds as well with her membership in la raza. The latino version of the KKK minus the hoods and nooses.

    Brit, Diversity is not a qualification requirement for SCOTUS. With there being nine justices one wayward non-constitutionally motivated vote will have huge implications. Her 80% failure rate as indicated by the number of her decisions overturned is an unmistakable testament of her incompetence. She has no business on the bench at all. If anything, an impediment to justice. Clearly she was a mistake and an unqualified affirmative action appointment from day one. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Davdah,
    I Agree!! You must have beaten me to LOL.

    Leave a comment:


  • ProudUSC
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Kollerkrot:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ProudUSC:
    I don't have a problem with the race or gender of a nominee for the Supreme Court. If that person is the most qualified of all the candidates and will uphold the Constitution, then so be it. But, I don't think someone should be appointed merely to diversify the Supreme Court. This person will hold one of the highest jobs in this country and will serve for life. It is too important a job to appoint someone just to make it another 'first' for this country. Just my take on it. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    ...and she is not appointed because she is latina. She is appointed because of her extensive record. We voted for change and that is change!! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I hope so. I'm not qualified to judge her. That is up to the Senate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kollerkrot
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ProudUSC:
    I don't have a problem with the race or gender of a nominee for the Supreme Court. If that person is the most qualified of all the candidates and will uphold the Constitution, then so be it. But, I don't think someone should be appointed merely to diversify the Supreme Court. This person will hold one of the highest jobs in this country and will serve for life. It is too important a job to appoint someone just to make it another 'first' for this country. Just my take on it. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    ...and she is not appointed because she is latina. She is appointed because of her extensive record. We voted for change and that is change!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Kollerkrot
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SonofMichael:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Brit4064:
    I think the Supreme Court should reflect the reality of the USA today. Not some mythological ideal from the 1950s, all white, middle-aged men, married with 2.4 kids etc. Wake up davdah, there's a whole world out there. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    White men are supreme masters you despicable low life. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> No their not ...and idiots come in all colors! As evidenced here.

    Leave a comment:


  • ProudUSC
    replied
    I don't have a problem with the race or gender of a nominee for the Supreme Court. If that person is the most qualified of all the candidates and will uphold the Constitution, then so be it. But, I don't think someone should be appointed merely to diversify the Supreme Court. This person will hold one of the highest jobs in this country and will serve for life. It is too important a job to appoint someone just to make it another 'first' for this country. Just my take on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SonofMichael
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Brit4064:
    I think the Supreme Court should reflect the reality of the USA today. Not some mythological ideal from the 1950s, all white, middle-aged men, married with 2.4 kids etc. Wake up davdah, there's a whole world out there. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    White men are supreme masters you despicable low life.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brit4064
    replied
    I think the Supreme Court should reflect the reality of the USA today. Not some mythological ideal from the 1950s, all white, middle-aged men, married with 2.4 kids etc. Wake up davdah, there's a whole world out there.

    Leave a comment:


  • mary Ireland
    replied
    som aint't racist lol see he loves us all on this site <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Brit4064:
    And you're not racist at all eh SoM?


    </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Leave a comment:


  • MakeItRight!
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Brit4064:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">It's a given she will. The radicals have taken over and the more different the nominee the more likely to be approved by the idiots in office. The selling out of our country has begun. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Hardly radical. Her record isn't one of extreme leftism. And she's one of 9 so it won't always go her way. Personally I think having some diversity on the Supreme Court is a good thing. After all, America isn't just made up of white men only. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    TRUE!!! Unfortunately The System appears To have Chosen Those Within Color, Race, Belief That many disapprove! Is Those That Do not play That card That Receive the gold star!!! GAMES!!!

    I Am In one of the last Commonwealths Left Whereas Normal Rules tend To Not exist. My Demeanor!

    Leave a comment:


  • Brit4064
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">It's a given she will. The radicals have taken over and the more different the nominee the more likely to be approved by the idiots in office. The selling out of our country has begun. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Hardly radical. Her record isn't one of extreme leftism. And she's one of 9 so it won't always go her way. Personally I think having some diversity on the Supreme Court is a good thing. After all, America isn't just made up of white men only.

    Leave a comment:


  • SonofMichael
    replied
    Yea but like most Latinos, she will get fired or knocked up within a few weeks. They are all the same.

    Leave a comment:


  • MakeItRight!
    replied
    She Will!

    Leave a comment:


  • Kollerkrot
    replied
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Robin Horton:
    who thinks she will get the nomination? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I do!

    Leave a comment:


  • SonofMichael
    replied
    She is not qualified for 4 reasons

    1. She is a woman (Low IQ)
    2. She is a Latino (not really an American)
    3. She is a racist
    4. She is a liberal

    Our leaders should be intelligent white Christian Libertarians. Nothing else is acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brit4064
    replied
    I think she will. Questions were raised about John Roberts and Sam Alito and they got through. What's important is her record, and that's largely neutral.

    Remember this? Sam Alito on empathy. Seems it was ok for him to be empathic back then:

    Flashback: Alito Knows A Thing Or Two About Empathy Also

    Leave a comment:

Sorry, you are not authorized to view this page

Home Page

Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Questions/Comments

SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily



Working...
X