Harsh Immigration Laws Threaten "Humanitarian Crisis" in Alabama, Prompting Latinos t

[federale86]

Since the Chief Justice has said publically that Plyer was decided incorrectly, then overturning Plyer is very likely.

And you are so s.tupid that you don't know the difference between an Act of Congress and a Supreme Court decision.

Probably because you want to live in a kritarchy.

[Hudson]

Fednut,
The only stupidity that I see is yours. YOu know nothing of the Constittuional process, much less the Constittuion. A decision by the Supreme Court, under the Supremcy clause, is in and of itself, a legal, binding enactment equal to and superior to a legislative act of Congress. And it does not matter what the opinion of any judicial individual whether they are the Chief Justice or any attorney, but only what the court ruling says. That is how a nation of laws is supposed to be governmed.

[Brit4064]

Try as we might Hudson, 'ol fedNUT just doesn't get it. We might as well be talking to one of these..

[federale86]

S.tupid No Brain Brit. The supremacy clause refers to the supremacy of the Federal government in areas reserved to the Federal government. It does not refer to the authority of the Supreme Court.

Of course, the 10th Amendment severely restricts Federal authority.

But in any event there is no restriction on the States authority to enforce Federal law by detaining illegal aliens and handing them over to the Federal government.

But your real goal is to have the Federal government not enforce the law, which is an impeachable offense for Barak Hussein Obama. He took an oath to see that the laws of the United States were faithfully executed.

[Brit4064]

Oh blah blah fedNUT. Now you sound like davdah. You just can't admit when you are wrong can you?

You still haven't directly answered why doesn't the AL law bar illegal immigrant kids from enrolling in public schools. After all, according to you the States have a right to make their own laws. So why didn't they?

[Hudson]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by federale86:
S.tupid No Brain Brit. The supremacy clause refers to the supremacy of the Federal government in areas reserved to the Federal government. It does not refer to the authority of the Supreme Court.

Of course, the 10th Amendment severely restricts Federal authority.

But in any event there is no restriction on the States authority to enforce Federal law by detaining illegal aliens and handing them over to the Federal government.

But your real goal is to have the Federal government not enforce the law, which is an impeachable offense for Barak Hussein Obama. He took an oath to see that the laws of the United States were faithfully executed. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Good god Fed, you are stupid. Everything you said will get an utter failure in the most conservative of law schools. For instnace, the SSupremecy clause refers to the Supremecy of the Constitution, including the judicial process. The Tenth amendment states that certain state rights are reserved for the states. Those rights are already listed in the Constitution, Article 4. And states are limited that their laws cannot exceed federal law. It is absolutely clear that immigration is solely reserved for the Federal govenment and in limited cases, the states may coordinate their activities with federal agents. But federal agents have the the jurisdiction. Nothing you have posted is true and accurate, just whimsical nonsense as usual. You are not only stupid, but a coward and a traitor and should be dealt with like any other traitor.

[Don Fernandez]

No cleavage = No sense. Ok, you can delete this.

[federale86]

Hudson you are s.tupid. The Supreme Court has already ruled that States may enforce immigration laws:

Hudson is the d.umbest person in the world. Mostly because all she knows is what No Brain Brit tells her.