The president has broad authority under Section 212(f) of the Immigration & Naturalization Act. He’s just continuing to exercise it in a way other than ever intended or imagined.
That provision of the statute reads “f....
Owner
Subscribers (2)
-
Reply to Letters of the Week: Apr 20 - Apr 2404-23-2020, 11:01 AM -
Reply to Letters of the Week: Apr 20 - Apr 24I will be doing an op-ed on the order when it is issued. In the meantime I will just point out that section 212(f) gives presidents virtually unlimited authority to keep people out of the country. And exception would be keeping people out on the basis...04-22-2020, 11:18 AM
-
Reply to Letters of the Week: Apr 20 - Apr 24It's time for the immigration bar to wake up. The game is over until Trump is defeated. Name me one positive Sp.Ct. decision involving immigration in the past 3 years? The Court is an abomination for anyone who believes in alien rights. The Sp. Ct....04-22-2020, 11:14 AM
-
Reply to Letters of the Week: Feb 17 - Feb 21Below is an article from the Econimica blog about US demographic trends. I don't necessarily endorse all the conclusions -- in particular, it excludes the 65+ age group where the action will be happening -- but the numbers are compelling overall. The...02-19-2020, 01:02 PM
-
Reply to Letters of the Week: Jan 6 - Jan 10Comment on Jan 3 Redeployment:
Have you lost your Mind?
The investor who has completed his original contracted for at risk investment and created the amount of jobs required under the EB-5 program should be subjected to further...01-06-2020, 10:58 AM -
Reply to Letters of the Week: Dec 23 - Dec 27I refer to the article by Mr. Roger Algase. Clearly he disagrees with the Trump administration’s immigration policies. But that does not render those policies grounds for impeachment. Differences of policies should be resolved by elections, not by...12-23-2019, 11:13 AM
There are no conversations in this channel.
Please log in to your account to view your subscribed posts.
No topics found.
