Biden Administration Expands Exemptions for Afghan Nationals Otherwise Inadmissible

by Rebekah Wolf


Obtaining immigration benefits from the U.S. government is always difficult, but it is even harder for people who have ever had any interaction with an organization or government that is deemed to support terrorism. As thousands of Afghans apply for immigration benefits in the United States, many risk being denied due to interactions with the Taliban. However, the Biden administration is expanding its efforts to avoid those denials.

On June 14, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of State (DOS) announced that it would expand these exemptions for certain Afghans. The exemptions—to be published in the federal register on June 23—are to the broad terrorism-related inadmissibility grounds (TRIG).

In expanding the exemptions for Afghans, the government acknowledged again that TRIG are “overly broad” and can inadvertently prevent individuals from gaining immigration benefits that are otherwise warranted.

The new exemptions for Afghan nationals may be applied on a case-by-case basis to the following:

  • Afghans who supported U.S. military interests, specifically those who fought against the Taliban or those who fought against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan from the late 1970s through the 1980s.
  • Individuals employed as civil servants in Afghanistan from September 27, 1996 to December 22, 2001 or after August 15, 2021. This includes teachers, postal workers, doctors, and others who worked in the roles during the Taliban’s administration but often did so under duress or to attempt to mitigate the harm of the Taliban government to civil society. It does not include high-level officials who worked in the Taliban administration.
  • Individuals who provided insignificant or limited material support to a designated terrorist organization. Because the Taliban is a U.S.-designated terrorist organization, under TRIG any amount of money or support given to the Taliban would otherwise be considered “material support” and therefore make a person inadmissible. This could include things like paying a fee at a checkpoint or paying for utilities. This is an additional exemption to that kind of material support.

As U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services acknowledges, terrorism-related inadmissibility grounds are broad, and “may apply to individuals and activities not commonly thought to be associated with terrorism.” They include both engaging in or inciting terrorist activity or being a member of a terrorist organization, as well as providing any “support” to such an organization, even if minimal. For many people, particularly those who come from countries where the governing party or a dominant political or military presence are considered terrorist organizations by the United States, avoiding even minimal “support” of such an organization can be virtually impossible. That’s why Congress granted the Secretaries of DHS and DOS the power to grant exemptions, which can be situational or group based.

Situational exemptions, like the ones granted by the Biden administration for Afghans, carve out exceptions for circumstances which would otherwise make someone inadmissible.  Other situational exemptions include where a person is required to provide material support to a terrorist organization under duress, or when a person provides voluntary medical care.

Group exemptions are often explicitly political, with the U.S. government exempting groups who would otherwise be considered terrorist organizations but for the positions they took regarding U.S. foreign policy. This can be seen in the group exemptions of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), the Kataeb Militias of Lebanon, and the Kosovo Liberation Army. Other countries have designated as these groups as terrorist organizations but they are allied with U.S. interests.

The TRIG framework can be very damaging to U.S. citizen families and employers who want to reunite with a family member who comes from a country where avoiding one of these bars is difficult. They operate as a complete bar to someone who would otherwise be eligible for an immigration benefit. This means spouses and parents of U.S. citizens and others who may be eligible for an immigrant visa or green card are prevented from obtaining them often due to circumstances outside of their control.

Exemptions are an important bulwark against the misapplication of TRIG and are a welcome addition to assisting Afghan nationals.  But the tying of such exemptions directly to U.S. foreign policy interests, either implicitly or explicitly, should be a cause for concern for those who believe the decisions about who is deserving of protection and benefits in the United States should not be solely based on who acts as our allies abroad. While this exemption was sorely needed, other people in similar situations continue to suffer.

This post originally appeared on Immigration Impact Reprinted with permission.


About The Author


Rebekah Wolf is a Staff Attorney with the Immigration Justice Campaign and Policy Department of the American Immigration Council. Her areas of expertise are immigration detention, border issues, and immigration enforcement in rural communities. Before coming to the Justice Campaign, she represented detained asylum-seekers in New Mexico, where she resides, as an Equal Justice Works Fellow. She created a legal access program from detained immigrants at the Cibola Detention Center, where she also coordinated litigation efforts in partnership with national organizations. She holds a B.A. in History from New York University and a J.D. from the University of California-Hastings with a concentration in international and comparative law. Before law school she was the co-founder and international director for an international non-governmental organization based in the U.S. and the Middle East. She is fluent in Arabic.

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.