ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Immigration LLC.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: I want to make a bet with everyone

  1. #1
    I am sure that you have all heard and read that all of the 51 states are suffering financially - that the budgets are being cut, and government employees are being laid off, etc. etc. etc. So
    I want to make a bet with everyone that in one year from now, we can check how all of the different states are doing, and that the following states will be doing much better than the rest: AK, HI, IL, MA, MI, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NM, NY, NC, ND, OR, RI, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, and WI. All of these states are the ones who do not require that someone be legal before issuing a driver's license. So many illegal aliens will be moving to these states soon and will undoubtedly lift their economy. Oregon and Vermont will be the states that will benefit the most since they are the only two states that also do NOT require an SSN from an applicant for a Driver's license.

    And, on the other extreme, the following states will suffer the most: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, ID, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, ME, MN, MS, NE, NJ, OH, OK, PA, SC, SD, VA*, WV, and WY. These are the ones that require a lawful presence before issuance of a driver's license.

    I personally know four families, all with a lot of money, who have left California and moved to Oregon to put up businesses there. Please print this and put it in your drawer or filing cabinet, and look at it again one year from now, and this will prove, once and for all, if illegal immigration is good or bad for the economy.

  2. #2
    the rednex or right wing bush supporters like fallweell, savage, limbaugh who dont realize that immigrants are what made USof a into a superpower.
    and as long it was the white man coming here in droves, then no problem, take over the indian land, terrorize them/.

  3. #3
    To GUEST:

    As PROOF states in his posting, you must truly be an idiot. Your reply does not address the issue that I am raising. Where were you when God gave man brains - on vacation ?

  4. #4
    i wonder if all those states you listed as "will be doing better in one year", are now doing better off economically than the ones listed on your "will be worse off" side.

    can ya answer that one, for the folks in the audience?

  5. #5
    I truly don't know the answer, since I have not investigated that. But it would be safe, I think, to assume that some in the first list are doing better than others in the second list, and some in the first list are doing worse than others in the second list.

  6. #6
    so ya just really dont know. oh ok

  7. #7
    I have the facts , how many do you want? All states with high numbers of illegal immigration will always be broke, Calif. has 4.5 million in L.A county alone , if your logic is good then how come they are not a financial power house, there budget problem is more then all state combined, their Education budget is 24 billion per year all caused by illegal immigration. Folks these mis understanding happen because you circumvent our laws and thus you do not get educated to how this country works, take government classes to get citizenship, you must learn how it works. The middle class wage earners support this country, we do not tax poverty level wage earners, your tax rate is 4.3% and if you file return you get it all back and then some, simple math will tell you that there is no way you can pay for services used at this rate. Example
    If you make $800.00 per month x 12 months=$9.600.00 per year tax at 4.3 %=$412.80 that is all you would pay the f government, if you have 4 kids in school learning English at a cost of $7,000 per year per kid $7000 x 4 = $28,000.00 you paid 412..80 of this, one trip to the hospital is $500.00 to walk in the door, food stamps, Medicare, wipe this out in one time use. Our hospitals are going broke, schools overcrowded and States do not have the taxes vs number of people to cover these mass immigration numbers. Any question I would be glad to answer. I live in NV and that is on your do good lists Wrong we are 1 billion in the hole now will be 10 billion in ten years if we keep going like this, we are one of the fastest growing illegal immigration state now, 300,000, we don't have the 77 million to teach English as a second language, this is projected to triple in the next year, to 231 million, we just had the Federal Government cut funds for illegal aliens in jail that cost 105 million we don't have. We all work hard but when you over run our services and you do not pay enough to increase them as needed ,well it only a matter of time before ship sinks. You work cheap ,you say where is the money then, in the pocket of the person you work cheep for that's who. When you work under the table ,no tax money is paid, its all in the pocket of who you worked for. This is why we have laws to limit numbers we cannot help every one at once.


    by Mark Andrew Dwyer - 12/22/02
    Although the idea of "taxing the rich and giving away to the poor" seemed easier for California Democrats to implement than it was for the governments of Eastern European People's Republics (there has been incomparably higher supply of the rich here than there), the Socialist governments had an actual advantage over the California Democrats. The Eastern European rich were not allowed to vote with their feet (run away, that is), and even when they managed to flee their countries, they had to leave most of their riches for the appeasement of their governments. Unlike the California rich who, once taxed to teeth, just moved out to another state that showed more respect for their above average income generating talents. This included those who profited handsomely form the (mostly illegal) immigrant "cheap labor" subsidized by the State of California in a form of free education, free health care, and low income housing, compliments of the rest of California taxpayers.

    To make the odds even more biased against the California Democrats, the Socialist governments did remarkably good job in not allowing millions of the poor to flood the People's Republics, partly because of very modest entitlements that they offered to their poor and partly because of stringent enforcement of the borders. Unlike the California Democrats who actually encouraged not only the domestic less fortunates to move into the "Golden" State, but they also welcomed millions of uneducated though highly fertile poor from Mexico and other Third-World countries to (legally or otherwise) cross the American border. Which had that unpleasant effect that the cost of welfare and indirect benefits that were given away to keep them afloat could sink even such potent money making machine as California economy.

    There are estimated 5 million+ illegal immigrants in California. They account for at least 15% of the state's population. Children of these illegal immigrants, technically not immigrants anymore (because they are not foreign born) constitute perhaps the largest single drain of California budget. Here are the figures. According to Laura E. Hill and Hans P. Johnson of the PPIC (Download PDF file), "between 1987 and 1991, total fertility rates [expected number of children per woman over her lifetime] for foreign-born Hispanics [in California] increased from 3.2 to 4.4", which more than doubled 2.1 replacement fertility rate for native Californians. (Per Steve Sailer, this illegal immigrant "baby boom" was triggered by the amnesty of 1986.) As a result, the percentage of illegal immigrants kids in public schools is more than twice their percentage (15%) of California's population, that is roughly 30% (well over 60% in highly populated areas of Southern California), simply because on average they had twice as many kids than natives. Since the K-12 total state enrollment is close to 6 million, that would yield an estimated 1.8 million of illegal aliens' children in California public schools. With average annual cost per student equal to $9,100 ("What the deficit could buy" Orange County Register, Dec 22, 2002), the estimated budget expenditure for educating children of illegal aliens is over $16 billion each year, almost half of current budget deficit. Think of it as a cost of derailing of Proposition 187 by Gov. Davis and his cabinet; despite what some bleeding heart liberal morons say, there is nothing in the U.S. law that would mandate FREE education of illegal alien children.

    But that's just a beginning. According to national statistics compiled by the Center for Immigration Studies, an average immigrant collects over his lifetime estimated $1,200 more in welfare and other benefits than he pays in all taxes. (For illegals, who often get paid "under the table" so that they don't pay taxes, and who are poorer and less educated than legal immigrants, the actual figure is - most likely - much higher.) That resulted in a total of $6 billion+ (low estimate) paid in welfare to the illegals under assumption that all the taxes they paid, if any, went back to California budget. Since a bulk of these taxes were used by the Federal Government, the resulting shortfall paid by the State of California was likely to be several times higher and to fall into a range of tens of billions of dollars. Add to that humongous (multi-million dollar) restitutions that were awarded by liberal judges to convicted drug traffickers and gang members after the evidence against them was deemed planted or otherwise inadmissible, and you will get the idea what happened to all the surpluses. They were recklessly wasted as if those who spent them were thinking "Easy come, easy go".

  8. #8
    The situation in California today is a direct result of BOTH the fraud that Enron and other energy wholesalers perpetuated on California and other states, and Proposition 187 enacted in California some years ago, forcing illegal immigrants (even before it was enacted) to move to other states.

    Here is part of an article I just read:


    Benefits and Costs. A new study by the Tomas Rivera Center found that, over the course of their lifetimes, immigrants contribute more in taxes to California than they cost in government services.

    The report found that the average immigrant costs the state of California about $62,600 in educational expenditures. However, when lifetime tax payments are adjusted to reflect what is repaid solely in education taxes, the immigrant will return about $89,437. According to the study, taxes for education plus those for social programs are $24,493 for legal immigrants, and $7,890 for illegal aliens.

    Economic Growth. California's economy appears to be rebounding. The unemployment rate dropped to 7.5 percent in April 1996, and about 561,000 net new jobs have been added in California since January 1993--at current rates, California is adding about 300,000 net new jobs per year, or almost 1,000 per day.

    California received an average $4853 in federal spending for each of its 31.4 million residents in 1995, less than the $5161 US average. Half of the $152.5 billion in federal payments were Social Security checks.


    I need to stress that I myself am against SOME forms of illegal immigration - such as those attempting to enter the U.S. without proper documentation. That should definitely be banned. However, there are those, many of whom I know personally, that came here with all proper documentation with the intention of following the law to the letter. However, unavoidable circumstances have caused these people to become illegal. These are the aliens that I believe should be given a chance to convert their status. It just isn't fair that someone does everything legally and gets into a bad situation because of the unfairness of some laws enacted by inefficient members of Congress. Look at that posting of PROOF under the heading "Illegal Aliens Must Be Deported". That is a classic example of what I am trying to stress.

  9. #9
    Oh, OK, I get it. You are either a puppet or a robot, but whoever invented you placed a microchip with very little vocabulary. That is why you keep on repeating yourself on every topic - same words all the time. What is your address, as I would love to send you a dictionary (not to worry, at my expense of course).

  10. #10
    to ACELAW and GUEST:

    The biggest economic damage done to the United States and its citizens to date has NOT been because of illegal immigration, but was perpetuated upon this country by the US Citizens running Enron, Worldcom, etc. etc. etc. Remember that all of the people running these companies at the time the horrendous criminal fraud was perpetuated are all blue-blooded white American US citizens. These are the people to blame for the economic woes of this country - not illegal immigrants.

Similar Threads

  1. I bet this one has not been brought up before...or has it?
    By JoeyVelderrain in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-08-2010, 11:22 AM
  2. Help Make It Right!
    By MakeItRight! in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-14-2009, 03:30 PM
  3. I'll make it short
    By rs in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-30-2008, 08:05 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-23-2006, 12:49 PM
  5. Where are you from? (enough to make a decision?)
    By cisse in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-26-2004, 06:21 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: