ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: cspa to tim and meljay

  1. #1
    Guest
    go to www.ins.gov, click INERENET-- click WHAT'S NEW, click ins policy proceedural memoranda. the ins example is still confusing to me. he said that the reciept date of the F-1-130 do not matter, it is the date the priority date becomes current and when the f-1-130 is adjudicated that matters. BUT -- - -

    here is the example: Form 1-130 filed in 1998, it became current today and Form 1-130 was adjudcicated not until today. The beneficary's age when dterming preference category would be 20 (the beneficiary is 24 today but the petitons was pendiding for 4 years)

    Where did he get 20. Was the 4 years PENDING PETITION deducted from 24 YEARS,the age of the beneficiary?,If we follow the guideline, there are no years between priority date and the adjudication date. In this example, the reciept date played a role.

    The guidelines continue -- if however, this same form 1-130 had been adjudicated in 2000, the beneficiary's age when determining preference category would be 22 (the beneficiary age is 24 today, but the petition was pending for only 2 years)

    I think this example is even more confusing. In this example, the old law will apply. CSPA becomes effective on 8-6-02.

    I know what the quideliner is thinking, but in order not to confuse those concerned, they should give a more current date.

  2. #2
    Guest
    go to www.ins.gov, click INERENET-- click WHAT'S NEW, click ins policy proceedural memoranda. the ins example is still confusing to me. he said that the reciept date of the F-1-130 do not matter, it is the date the priority date becomes current and when the f-1-130 is adjudicated that matters. BUT -- - -

    here is the example: Form 1-130 filed in 1998, it became current today and Form 1-130 was adjudcicated not until today. The beneficary's age when dterming preference category would be 20 (the beneficiary is 24 today but the petitons was pendiding for 4 years)

    Where did he get 20. Was the 4 years PENDING PETITION deducted from 24 YEARS,the age of the beneficiary?,If we follow the guideline, there are no years between priority date and the adjudication date. In this example, the reciept date played a role.

    The guidelines continue -- if however, this same form 1-130 had been adjudicated in 2000, the beneficiary's age when determining preference category would be 22 (the beneficiary age is 24 today, but the petition was pending for only 2 years)

    I think this example is even more confusing. In this example, the old law will apply. CSPA becomes effective on 8-6-02.

    I know what the quideliner is thinking, but in order not to confuse those concerned, they should give a more current date.

Similar Threads

  1. TO UMESH AND EASY-CSPA -- CSPA
    By in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 05-06-2008, 11:35 PM
  2. cspa
    By in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 12-27-2002, 12:22 PM
  3. cspa
    By in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-14-2002, 02:08 PM
  4. cspa to tim and meljay
    By in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-26-2002, 03:47 AM
  5. CSPA help
    By in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-01-2002, 11:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: