ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: CSS-Newman class members living abroad or whose applications deemed abandoned

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    3
    Class counsel in the CSS and LULAC-Newman cases are preparing a class-wide motion to enforce the settlements in those cases on behalf of the following class members:

    1) Class members denied class membership or legalization because they are now living abroad (including those who could not attend an interview because they now live abroad).

    2) Class members whose legalization applications CIS denied as "abandoned" because the class member failed to respond (or respond adequately or timely) to a notice of intent to deny (NOID) or request for additional evidence (RFE).

    CSS and Newman class members in these categories are encouraged to contact Wendy Hernandez at the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law, whernandez@centerforhumanrights.org.

    Thank you.

    Carlos Holguin
    General Counsel
    Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law
    256 S. Occidental Blvd.
    Los Angeles, CA 90057
    213.388.8693

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    3
    Class counsel in the CSS and LULAC-Newman cases are preparing a class-wide motion to enforce the settlements in those cases on behalf of the following class members:

    1) Class members denied class membership or legalization because they are now living abroad (including those who could not attend an interview because they now live abroad).

    2) Class members whose legalization applications CIS denied as "abandoned" because the class member failed to respond (or respond adequately or timely) to a notice of intent to deny (NOID) or request for additional evidence (RFE).

    CSS and Newman class members in these categories are encouraged to contact Wendy Hernandez at the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law, whernandez@centerforhumanrights.org.

    Thank you.

    Carlos Holguin
    General Counsel
    Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law
    256 S. Occidental Blvd.
    Los Angeles, CA 90057
    213.388.8693

  3. #3
    No, we don't need more illegal aliens. Thanks, we have enough already. Especially those illegal aliens who left.

  4. #4
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by crholguin:
    Class counsel in the CSS and LULAC-Newman cases are preparing a class-wide motion to enforce the settlements in those cases on behalf of the following class members:

    1) Class members denied class membership or legalization because they are now living abroad (including those who could not attend an interview because they now live abroad).

    2) Class members whose legalization applications CIS denied as "abandoned" because the class member failed to respond (or respond adequately or timely) to a notice of intent to deny (NOID) or request for additional evidence (RFE).

    CSS and Newman class members in these categories are encouraged to contact Wendy Hernandez at the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law, whernandez@centerforhumanrights.org.

    Thank you.

    Carlos Holguin
    General Counsel
    Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law
    256 S. Occidental Blvd.
    Los Angeles, CA 90057
    213.388.8693 </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    hjhsdgfghdshfvgsdfgsdhfghdsgvhdsvbsdvcsdnbvcnbsdvbcvdsbnvchgdsdvcbvsdghcvdsvcdsvcbnadsvbcnvasdgcvbdasvcbvdsbncvsdgh

    but of coarse!!!

    We see???? Eventually Everything Catches up!!! Manipulation and Abuse of Those Holes Will be filled with Such Just Adequate By products Created By Non Other Than Self!!!

    Fraud, manipulation, Deceit, is not an endless endeavor! Even large organizations Are Daily survival! Tomorrow Brings New!!! truth and justice Does not Disappear! Only Thee illusion Of succeess so very Temporary!!! After Extensive Study, America/Americans have A "THING" A Force, An Ability? It can Take an I mobilized appearance For a period of Time! Temporary!!! Many Cultures, many designs, Can Give or sacrifice Life Easily To Make a Point or Fight To win! Americans of True Not That simple!!! Always Adjusting!!! Always Adjusting!!! TIME!!!! just Because you appear To have succeeded, does Not mean you Are home free!!!!!!!!!!
    USC and Legal, Honest Immigrant Alike Must Fight Against Those That Deceive and Disrupt A Place Of Desirability! All Are Victims of Fraud, Both USC and Honest Immigrant Alike! The bad can and does make it more difficult for the good! Be careful who y

  5. #5
    Carlos,

    What you folks did who are inside the country..its almost 27 years gone by..nothing happen to them except hope,insecurity,mental torture..now they are in old age..see if you can do anything about them.....

  6. #6
    The motion should be for the thousand cases that are still pending after 22 years and living in US.

  7. #7
    Carlos,

    It’s tough for me to decide whether it would be better to file a lawsuit against the USCIS for not adhering to the settlement agreements, of your infamous class action case. Or to file a lawsuit against you, and your slick buddy Peter Schey, for getting many of us into a catastrophic mess and abandoning us while the ship sank. You did not stick around long enough to discover that the settlement agreement was NOT followed. In fact it was spat on by the arrogant and rouge USCIS.

    I myself had 4 scheduled interviews, with 3 different immigration officers. All these interrogations were not to find out if I qualified for legalization, they were to find a way to deny my petition. When no legitimate reason could be found. They made up a false reasons, then denied me for them. Where were you Carlos, sun tanning at the beach or fatting up at the buffet?

  8. #8
    you are 100% right unique...they r thinking to make some x-tra money again....

  9. #9
    What a load of B.S. So, the lawyers want to act on behalf of people who weren't even supposed to be in America and have now left America? This is absurd!!

    When will you guys realize that illegal is illegal?

    If you wanted to live in America, you should have done it correctly the first time.

  10. #10
    Unique you are right Carlos Holguin and Peter Shay are looking for more money, they do don't care nothing else.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 218
    Last Post: 03-01-2016, 10:33 PM
  2. CSS/LULAC/Newman applications declared abandoned or rejected
    By crholguin in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-20-2010, 08:31 AM
  3. CSS & Newman/LULAC
    By schicco in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-03-2007, 12:21 PM
  4. CSS/NEWMAN flawed:
    By unique in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-21-2006, 05:17 PM
  5. CSS/NEWMAN NIGHTMARE
    By unique in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-07-2006, 07:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: