ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



Immigration Daily


The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
© 1995-
Immigration LLC.

Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Article: Congress-Passed Spending Bill Leaves DHS in Limbo. By Amanda Peterson Beadle

  1. #1

    Article: Congress-Passed Spending Bill Leaves DHS in Limbo. By Amanda Peterson Beadle

    Congress-Passed Spending Bill Leaves DHS in Limbo



    Following the close vote in the House last week, the Senate passed a spending bill 56-40 on Saturday to fund most of the government for the next year and avoid a government shutdown. Excluded from that full-year deal is the Department of Homeland Security, which is only funded until February 27 under the so-called “cromnibus” bill.

    The spending measure received the name “cromnibus” because, as Vox explains, it is a “mash-up of an omnibus bill, which is how Congress funds the government when things are working normally, and a continuing resolution (CR), which is how Congress funds the government when it can’t come to a deal.” DHS is the only government department funded by a continuing resolution. Many congressional Republicans did not want to fund DHS for an entire year so that they could attempt to halt President Obama’s executive action on immigration later. “Republicans in Congress are betting that once they have control of Congress in 2015, they can defund President Obama’s immigration measure,” writes Forbes’ Kelly Phillips.

    DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson warned against a separate continuing resolution for Homeland Security. “That is in my judgment a very bad idea for Homeland Security because during that period of a CR we cannot engage in new starts,” Johnson said during a congressional hearing on the president’s immigration executive actions. “We’ve got some homeland security priorities that need to be funded now.” He added that DHS could not hire new Secret Service agents without a new appropriations bill and that a short-term bill could not fund “enhanced” immigration enforcement operations like the new immigration detention center in Dilley, Texas.

    But even the short-term deal to fund DHS into 2015 did not pacify some Republicans. After a GOP conference meeting about the funding deal, Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) claimed House leaders “surrendered to President Obama on the illegal alien issue, and have supported and decided to fund amnesty.” The cromnibus narrowly passed the House on Thursday. In the Senate on Saturday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) raised a constitutional point of order against the cromnibus before the Senate voted to approve the measure. Cruz called the vote on his point of order as a vote to defund executive amnesty because the bill funds DHS. His point of order lost 22-74 before the Senate went on to approve the cromnibus.

    While Congress reached a deal to fund the federal government without a shutdown, it has left DHS in a precarious situation with only a few months of funding as GOP hardliners wait until, as Rep. Matt Salmon (R-AZ) put it, “the cavalry arrives” and Republicans hold a majority in both chambers. In the quest of a few to stop President Obama’s constitutional use of his authority to temporarily defer deportations for millions of immigrants, Republicans are also endangering funding for homeland security measures.

    Photo Courtesy of Public Affairs.

    This post originally appeared on
    Immigration Impact. Reprinted with permission

    About The Author

    Amanda Peterson Beadle
    Amanda Peterson Beadle is a Reporter/Blogger at She received her B.A. in journalism and Spanish from the University of Alabama, where she was editor-in-chief of the campus newspaper The Crimson White and graduated with honors. Before joining ThinkProgress, she worked as a legislative aide in the Maryland House of Delegates. In college, she interned at the Scripps Howard Foundation Wire, the Press-Register (Mobile, Alabama), and the Ludington Daily News. She is from Birmingham, Alabama.

    The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of

  2. #2
    Acton Orwell Good

    reaction to the reaction

    O tempores ! O mores!

    there seems to be no end to the madness of the hardcore right wing or should it be white wing ? Anti-immigrant bigotry is simply an acceptable extension in code of the old racism. The notion that someone, somewhere is "taking something" has infected the body politic, along with the "immigration is easy" and " we weren't like that when we came over" and "these people don't belong here" . . . "what is there about illegal that you don't understand" - all false premises lead to false conclusions.

    Law is malleable through rational, compassionate, humane thought. Good law fosters a commonweal. Bad laws create confusion, disrespect, and impossible circumstances. I am speaking of historically bad laws, like the Fugitive Slave Law, and the Jim Crow Laws, and laws forbidding women to own property or vote and any number of historic examples where the accepted reality chafes the conscience of those who still harbor one. How far back would the reactionaries want to turn our society?

    Immigration, chosen by political gamesmen as "wedge issues" like same sex marriage, abortion, welfare mothers. . . will eventually haunt the national conscience when the demographics of immigration mature to holding the Congressional haters to accountability at the polls.

    In the meantime ( and the times are truly mean!) Perhaps the right can be persuaded that:

    1) national security will be served by vetting the undocumented

    2) the national economy will be improved by new taxpayers on the rolls, and by increased social security contributions

    3) the national economy may be improved by the release of the undocumenteds' pent-up demand for stability in terms of capital purchases of autos and homes and businesses

    4) The commonweal will be better served by welcoming and integrating the ambitions and talents of all, because America works best as a meritocracy, and cannot or will not long sustain an oligarchy

    Congress can lead in enlightened polices; or appeal to the least common denominator - fear, emboldened by leaders show benefit from it.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-27-2013, 02:23 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-17-2013, 03:31 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-14-2013, 12:57 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-21-2013, 10:35 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-12-2013, 04:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: