ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



Immigration Daily


The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
© 1995-
Immigration LLC.

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Article: New Report Explains How U.S. Reached Record-Breaking Removals By Mark Noferi

  1. #1

    Article: New Report Explains How U.S. Reached Record-Breaking Removals By Mark Noferi

    New Report Explains How U.S. Reached Record-Breaking Removals



    In March, as the Obama Administration was poised to deport its 2 millionth immigrant, National Council of La Raza President Janet Murguia dubbed Obama the “deporter-in-chief.” A new report from the Migration Policy Institute released Thursday confirms there is “no ambiguity that removals are at an all-time high,” as author Marc Rosenblum stated. The report, through never-before-released data, also examines how the Obama Administration has achieved its deportations, compared to the Bush Administration. Although the administration is largely achieving its priorities of deporting those with criminal convictions, prior deportation orders, or whom crossed the border recently, the data indicates the administration will not be able to continue record deportation levels without significant, and likely increasing, human impact.

    The report analyzed 3.7 million formal removals from fiscal years 2003 to 2013, spanning the Bush and Obama Administrations. Although both administrations have billed deportation as a way to protect public safety, the majority of DHS removals—59 percent—were of non-criminals. Moreover, of those removed with criminal convictions, 71 percent did not have a serious or violent conviction. Eighteen percent had only an immigration-related conviction (such as re-entry), with immigration convictions rising to 30 percent of FY 2013 convictions. Along with studies this year showing no connection between Secure Communities and reductions in crime, this data further undermines claims that deportations protect public safety.

    To achieve continuing levels of record removals, the report finds that the Obama Administration has shifted resources to the border. Seventy percent of all removals in FY 2013 were at the border. And at the border, over the last decade, 84 percent of the removals have been through nonjudicial, out-of-court proceedings (expedited removal and reinstatement of removal). As such, the report complements recent DHS FY 2013 data showing similar overall trends.

    DHS likely is shifting resources to the border because it can more efficiently achieve removals there than inside the US, for two reasons. For one, at the border, DHS can apprehend someone and more likely remove them in the same fiscal year, through out-of-court proceedings. Interior removals largely lead to in-court removal proceedings, which now take over a year and a half on average because of chronic immigration court underfunding. Yet out-of-court proceedings pose serious due process concerns, as the Council has previously argued—especially for asylum seekers.

    And cities, counties, and states increasingly are adopting policies of noncompliance with ICE. About 250 counties nationwide have now stopped honoring ICE “detainer” requests. ICE could reinstitute raids in the jurisdictions that have stopped complying with ICE, as a recent National Day Laborer Organizing Network report alleged is occurring. But if DHS’ goal is to effectuate removal numbers, DHS may see the border as a path of lesser resistance.

    Given these record-breaking deportation numbers overall, though, it will likely grow harder for DHS to continue deportations without significant human impact. This is true even if DHS continues shifting resources to the border. Deportations will still have human impact inside the border. Some border crossers may be returning to join family. Some may be asylum seekers and returning to join family, especially this year from Central America.

    And inside the border, although DHS is seeking to focus on removing those with criminal convictions, most with convictions do not have serious convictions. Many may have families, and deep U.S. ties. Pew found recently that the median unauthorized immigrant has been in the U.S. for 13 years. In effect, DHS is not removing the “worst of the worst,” but the least of the worst.

    To date, the Obama Administration has attempted to walk the tightrope between demonstrating “tough” and “humane” enforcement. It will likely be increasingly difficult to do that—if it was ever achievable at all.

    Photo by Stephan Hochhaus.

    This post originally appeared on Immigration Impact © 2014 Immigration Impact. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.

    About The Author

    Mark Noferi

    Mark Noferi teaches a Civil Rights and Immigration seminar at Brooklyn Law School, as well as legal writing. Professor Noferi's research interests focus on immigrants' rights, and criminal, constitutional and administrative law. He recently published on the right to counsel for immigration detainees (, and previously on due process limits on conspiracy liability. He also chairs a subcommittee of the New York City Bar studying immigration detention, which is actively advocating Congress for appointed counsel and reduced detention in immigration proceedings.  Their materials are available at

    The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of

  2. #2
    It's too bad the US hasn't deported 4 million....these lowlifes have thumbed their unwashed noses at our laws...of course, immigration attorneys don't make a nickel when ICE/DHS ships somebody home from the border....through expedited removal or whatever...I applaud CBP...ship more dirtbags home...illegal aliens have zero respect for the laws of the United States of America....and immigration attorneys don't seem to long as they can bill somebody $400 for their 'services.'
    We have visa laws for a reason....(a simple fact that immigration attorneys keep forgetting)...if we allow everyone from anywhere unfettered access to this country, our culture will go down the drain in no time...not that immigration attorneys long as those checks clear the bank...

  3. #3
    Nolan Rappaport
    Unfortunately, focusing enforcement policy on dangerous criminals, which seems to be what Mark wants, would make it harder to cut a deal on immigration reform legislation with the republicans. They are looking for an IRCA-wipe-the-slate-clean deal that will work this time, i.e., they will go along with legalization if they are persuaded that enforcement measures will be implemented to prevent a new group of undocumented aliens from taking the place of the ones being legalized. And that would require enforcing the law against all undocumented aliens, not just the dangerous criminals.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-10-2014, 01:36 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-03-2014, 05:23 PM
  3. Article: OCAHO Breaking New Ground by Bruce Buchanan
    By ImmigrationDaily in forum Immigration Daily
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-08-2013, 08:31 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-14-2012, 10:02 PM
  5. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-11-2002, 12:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: