ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Explain this to me please

  1. #1
    1 False immaterial testimony cannot be used to establish deportability. See Ramero v INS, 39 F.3d 977 (9 th Cir. 1994). See also Plewa v. INS, 77 F. Supp. 2d 905 (N.D. Ill. 1999) (failure to disclose an immaterial arrest based on erroneous advice from an immigration counselor did not disqualify the applicant from establishing good moral character even though the applicant lied under oath to the INS examiner).

    Please explain this to me. If I am reading correctly then I cannot believe what I am reading.

  2. #2
    1 False immaterial testimony cannot be used to establish deportability. See Ramero v INS, 39 F.3d 977 (9 th Cir. 1994). See also Plewa v. INS, 77 F. Supp. 2d 905 (N.D. Ill. 1999) (failure to disclose an immaterial arrest based on erroneous advice from an immigration counselor did not disqualify the applicant from establishing good moral character even though the applicant lied under oath to the INS examiner).

    Please explain this to me. If I am reading correctly then I cannot believe what I am reading.

  3. #3
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Robin Horton:
    1 False immaterial testimony cannot be used to establish deportability. See Ramero v INS, 39 F.3d 977 (9 th Cir. 1994). See also Plewa v. INS, 77 F. Supp. 2d 905 (N.D. Ill. 1999) (failure to disclose an immaterial arrest based on erroneous advice from an immigration counselor did not disqualify the applicant from establishing good moral character even though the applicant lied under oath to the INS examiner).

    Please explain this to me. If I am reading correctly then I cannot believe what I am reading. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    It's because it's immaterial! If it would be a material fact it would be opposite!
    “...I may condemn what you say, but I will give my life for that you may say it”! - Voltaire

  4. #4
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Robin Horton:
    1 False immaterial testimony cannot be used to establish deportability. See Ramero v INS, 39 F.3d 977 (9 th Cir. 1994). See also Plewa v. INS, 77 F. Supp. 2d 905 (N.D. Ill. 1999) (failure to disclose an immaterial arrest based on erroneous advice from an immigration counselor did not disqualify the applicant from establishing good moral character even though the applicant lied under oath to the INS examiner).

    Please explain this to me. If I am reading correctly then I cannot believe what I am reading. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    What is the question? Law is complicated and not all cases are text book.

  5. #5
    Lawyers rarely get the boot, spanked, etc even though they have slept during a murder trial.
    "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams on Defense of the boston Massacre

  6. #6
    there is a difference between not having your credentials in order and being sanctioned Davdah. Where i am at, the immigration court does not list that on the public notice board. you are given a list that is recommended by the immigration court for free legal advice, and that is all.
    "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams on Defense of the boston Massacre

  7. #7
    dirty commie judges change the law at their whim.

Similar Threads

  1. explain better
    By navid in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-17-2009, 09:58 PM
  2. Can you explain
    By Peter Brown in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-23-2004, 06:52 PM
  3. Please explain...
    By Dane in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-19-2004, 12:54 PM
  4. Can someone explain me please....
    By in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-28-2003, 09:09 PM
  5. Explain it please............
    By in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-13-2002, 10:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: