ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Great column by Dana Milbank of Washington Post

  1. #1
    Forget Politics. This Battle Is Personal.

    By Dana Milbank
    Wednesday, May 24, 2006; Page A02

    Alabama's Jeff Sessions sure knows how to nurse a grudge. Talking about his family earlier this year, the Republican senator recalled that "Lincoln killed one of them at Antietam."

    Now he is turning his prodigious anger on legislation the Senate is expected to approve on Thursday that would allow millions of illegal immigrants to become citizens. In the process, Sessions is taking on the White House, his leaders in the Senate, the Congressional Budget Office and business interests at home.


    "It's painful to bring people who are unable to speak English or to effectively take advantage of the opportunities our country has," said Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.).


    "This bill is one of the worst pieces of legislation to come before the Senate," he proclaimed at a news conference yesterday, his second on the topic in as many weeks. He paused, unsatisfied with that superlative. "It's the worst piece of legislation to come before the Senate since I've been here."

    A stream of epithets about the legislation flowed from his mouth and those of the two conservative scholars he brought with him. "Colossal error . . . absolute scandal . . . budget buster . . . fiscal disaster . . . catastrophe."

    Linda Scott of PBS's "NewsHour" pointed out that the Alabama Farmers Federation takes the opposite view.

    The senator fired back: "They want cheap labor and they're not considering the interest of the United States of America."

    With the exception of some small victories -- Sessions persuaded his colleagues last week to support 370 miles of fence along the Mexican border and 500 miles of vehicle barriers -- the man from Alabama knows he has lost the battle in the Senate.

    "We're heading to passage," he conceded yesterday, even as he readied a last-minute parliamentary maneuver to derail the bill today. Ultimately, he's hoping House Republicans, who have passed an immigration crackdown without legalization, will prevail in negotiations with the Senate.

    "It will have to be rewritten," Sessions predicted of the Senate measure. "The bill is not fixable."

    A short, wiry man with protruding ears, Sessions has become the Lou Dobbs of the Senate. He argues his points not with the courtly Southern tones of the late senator Howell Heflin (D), his predecessor, but with the harsh t**** of a country tough -- which, in a sense, he is.

    Sessions was one of just nine senators to oppose a ban on torture. He has raised objections about renewing the Voting Rights Act. In the days after Hurricane Katrina, according to Time magazine, Sessions, pushing for repeal of the estate tax, called a former law professor to see if he knew of any business owner who died in the storm.

    And if his current fight in the Senate appears unwinnable, Sessions also knows how to turn defeat into victory. He sits on the same Judiciary Committee that in 1986 rejected him for a federal judgeship; opponents at the time cited his labeling of groups such as the NAACP as "un-American" and his prosecution of civil rights activists for voting fraud.

    Sessions has joined the immigration debate with typical ferocity, impugning the motives of those who disagree with him. "We have quite a number of members of the House and Senate and members in the media who are all in favor of reforms and improvements as long as they don't really work," he said last week of those who opposed the 370 miles of fencing. "But good fences make good neighbors. Fences don't make bad neighbors."

    The senator evidently hadn't consulted the residents of Korea, Berlin or the West Bank.

    On Monday, he was on the Senate floor again, accusing his opponents of dishonesty. "The legislation has been crafted in a way that hides and conceals, even misrepresents its real effects," he said. "We should be ashamed of ourselves."

    The Bush White House worries that the words of Sessions and like-minded lawmakers in the House will alienate Hispanic voters from the GOP. And, indeed, the senator's words can sound a bit harsh, as he fights to limit legal immigration, cut off tax benefits for those earning legal status and limit legal immigrants' ability to bring over family members.

    "It's painful to bring people who are unable to speak English or to effectively take advantage of the opportunities our country has," he told his colleagues this week. "They tend to pull themselves apart and continue to speak their own language, and they don't advance and assimilate."

    Forecasting a mass immigration of 73 million to 92 million over the next 20 years, Sessions described the process in extraordinary detail: "The nuclear family that we bring in after five years, they become citizens, they bring in their parents. . . . The parents can bring in their parents if they're still alive. They really can. Maybe they're 90. They can bring in others -- their brothers and sisters. The uncles, all the uncles can come in with this through the parents here. And the wife can bring in brothers and sisters and then the wife brings in her brother, who brings in his wife and two children and she brings in her parents. And it just goes on."

    This may not be the best way to broaden the Republican appeal, but that's not Sessions's worry. "I'm beyond politics," he said yesterday. His opponents would readily agree.


    A national political reporter for the Post, Milbank writes Washington Sketch, an observational column about political theater in the White House, Congress and elsewhere in the capital. He covered the 2000 and 2004 presidential campaigns and President Bush's first term. Before coming to the Post as a Style political writer in 2000, he covered the Clinton White House for the New Republic and Congress for the Wall Street Journal


    Link to this Column http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...052301519.html

  2. #2
    Forget Politics. This Battle Is Personal.

    By Dana Milbank
    Wednesday, May 24, 2006; Page A02

    Alabama's Jeff Sessions sure knows how to nurse a grudge. Talking about his family earlier this year, the Republican senator recalled that "Lincoln killed one of them at Antietam."

    Now he is turning his prodigious anger on legislation the Senate is expected to approve on Thursday that would allow millions of illegal immigrants to become citizens. In the process, Sessions is taking on the White House, his leaders in the Senate, the Congressional Budget Office and business interests at home.


    "It's painful to bring people who are unable to speak English or to effectively take advantage of the opportunities our country has," said Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.).


    "This bill is one of the worst pieces of legislation to come before the Senate," he proclaimed at a news conference yesterday, his second on the topic in as many weeks. He paused, unsatisfied with that superlative. "It's the worst piece of legislation to come before the Senate since I've been here."

    A stream of epithets about the legislation flowed from his mouth and those of the two conservative scholars he brought with him. "Colossal error . . . absolute scandal . . . budget buster . . . fiscal disaster . . . catastrophe."

    Linda Scott of PBS's "NewsHour" pointed out that the Alabama Farmers Federation takes the opposite view.

    The senator fired back: "They want cheap labor and they're not considering the interest of the United States of America."

    With the exception of some small victories -- Sessions persuaded his colleagues last week to support 370 miles of fence along the Mexican border and 500 miles of vehicle barriers -- the man from Alabama knows he has lost the battle in the Senate.

    "We're heading to passage," he conceded yesterday, even as he readied a last-minute parliamentary maneuver to derail the bill today. Ultimately, he's hoping House Republicans, who have passed an immigration crackdown without legalization, will prevail in negotiations with the Senate.

    "It will have to be rewritten," Sessions predicted of the Senate measure. "The bill is not fixable."

    A short, wiry man with protruding ears, Sessions has become the Lou Dobbs of the Senate. He argues his points not with the courtly Southern tones of the late senator Howell Heflin (D), his predecessor, but with the harsh t**** of a country tough -- which, in a sense, he is.

    Sessions was one of just nine senators to oppose a ban on torture. He has raised objections about renewing the Voting Rights Act. In the days after Hurricane Katrina, according to Time magazine, Sessions, pushing for repeal of the estate tax, called a former law professor to see if he knew of any business owner who died in the storm.

    And if his current fight in the Senate appears unwinnable, Sessions also knows how to turn defeat into victory. He sits on the same Judiciary Committee that in 1986 rejected him for a federal judgeship; opponents at the time cited his labeling of groups such as the NAACP as "un-American" and his prosecution of civil rights activists for voting fraud.

    Sessions has joined the immigration debate with typical ferocity, impugning the motives of those who disagree with him. "We have quite a number of members of the House and Senate and members in the media who are all in favor of reforms and improvements as long as they don't really work," he said last week of those who opposed the 370 miles of fencing. "But good fences make good neighbors. Fences don't make bad neighbors."

    The senator evidently hadn't consulted the residents of Korea, Berlin or the West Bank.

    On Monday, he was on the Senate floor again, accusing his opponents of dishonesty. "The legislation has been crafted in a way that hides and conceals, even misrepresents its real effects," he said. "We should be ashamed of ourselves."

    The Bush White House worries that the words of Sessions and like-minded lawmakers in the House will alienate Hispanic voters from the GOP. And, indeed, the senator's words can sound a bit harsh, as he fights to limit legal immigration, cut off tax benefits for those earning legal status and limit legal immigrants' ability to bring over family members.

    "It's painful to bring people who are unable to speak English or to effectively take advantage of the opportunities our country has," he told his colleagues this week. "They tend to pull themselves apart and continue to speak their own language, and they don't advance and assimilate."

    Forecasting a mass immigration of 73 million to 92 million over the next 20 years, Sessions described the process in extraordinary detail: "The nuclear family that we bring in after five years, they become citizens, they bring in their parents. . . . The parents can bring in their parents if they're still alive. They really can. Maybe they're 90. They can bring in others -- their brothers and sisters. The uncles, all the uncles can come in with this through the parents here. And the wife can bring in brothers and sisters and then the wife brings in her brother, who brings in his wife and two children and she brings in her parents. And it just goes on."

    This may not be the best way to broaden the Republican appeal, but that's not Sessions's worry. "I'm beyond politics," he said yesterday. His opponents would readily agree.


    A national political reporter for the Post, Milbank writes Washington Sketch, an observational column about political theater in the White House, Congress and elsewhere in the capital. He covered the 2000 and 2004 presidential campaigns and President Bush's first term. Before coming to the Post as a Style political writer in 2000, he covered the Clinton White House for the New Republic and Congress for the Wall Street Journal


    Link to this Column http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...052301519.html

  3. #3
    I hate to agree with sen. Sessions, but it is true that the bill have not been thought trough. Senate had to spend more time on it . Hopefully the conference will bring some good changes.

  4. #4
    The columnist, Dana Milbank, sums up her own credibility in her description of the Senator:

    "A short, wiry man with protruding ears, Sessions has become the Lou Dobbs of the Senate."

    No bias there, ha ha. What a rag, a true discrace to journalists everywhere.

  5. #5
    Err. The article indicates that Dana is male.
    The above is simply an opinion. Your mileage may vary. For immigration issues, please consult an immigration attorney.

  6. #6
    Someone12
    Guest
    all of you "do-gooders" have forgotten the simple fact that if we legalize 10M+ dirtbags, they will then bring their 30-50M dirtbag family members here,to overcrowd our schools, swamp our medical facilities and lower wages....why in the world do we want this?
    We do not. Rewarding scum is ludicrous....why not open the prisons and release those dirtbags as well?

  7. #7
    I hope that Senator Sessions (R-Alabama) runs for President. He is one of the voices of reason and sanity in the U.S. Senate.

  8. #8
    I agree with you SunDevilUSA. I don't share his positions, but I think that he is a smart and responsible man who knows the importance of government decisions. I hate the way he talks though

  9. #9
    This bill is about helping business increase its supply of cheap labor nothing more. It is pathetic the way our Senators are rolling over for them.

  10. #10
    Don't forget that human beings represent 'Cheap labor', therefore the bill primarily helps people and not businesses.

Similar Threads

  1. FBI Raid Hits a Constitutional Nerve by DANA MILBANK
    By moemoe in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-02-2006, 12:07 PM
  2. Jeff Grienfield's column
    By moemoe in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-31-2006, 07:56 AM
  3. VERY interesting article in today's Washington Post - Enjoy!
    By Kelly2006 in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-08-2006, 11:07 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-15-2006, 11:18 PM
  5. Washington Post-ABC News poll on immigration
    By jean2005 in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-14-2006, 04:20 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: