ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Federale's Immigrant Of The Day: Rene Orozco

  1. #1

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Someone12
    Guest
    another "bolsa de mierda"...hey Fredy, why don't you invite this cerveza-swiller to live with you?

  4. #4
    The story goes in part, thus:

    "... Metro said it identified several people who allege Orozco accepted money from them to assist with “citizenship and criminal defense issues” and then failed to deliver any assistance.

    The majority of those who lodged complaints are undocumented or are facing other citizenship issues, police said. ... Police said the investigation is ongoing. ..."
    (emphasis added)

    I can't resist the temptation to repeat that line: "The majority of those who lodged complaints are undocumented..." Nothing, there's just that silly ring to it.

    I'm not in anyway meaning to cuddle anyone engaging in any form of criminal conduct. No. I mean, no way. If this man's really guilty of the offenses as alleged, then count me in to want to have him serve his time and kicked out of here for good.

    But, hey, we're a nation of laws, remember? The defendant, regardless of personal circumstances, is afforded the doctrine to be presumed innocent until proven guilty 'beyond reasonable doubt.' (See Taylor v. Kentucky).

    And it applies to all, not selectively, even if one's name happens to be distinctly sounding of that of a certain group. Or even otherwise. No more, no less.

  5. #5
    Correct RN. That's what America stands for. Justice for all, not when it's convenient not to as Bush attempted to do with the Gitmo lot by trying to side-step the Constitution (and failed).
    "What you see in the photograph isn't what you saw at the time. The real skill of photography is organized visual lying."

  6. #6
    What? Sort of how Roosevelt sidestepped the Constitution with the German terrorist and war criminal cases?

  7. #7
    You mean FDR. But G.W. Bush also did so many times. Just as how Lincoln and Wilson did during their terms. But only when the national interests warranted it. The Founding Fathers knew this when they formulated the American system. When confronted with major crisis such as one with an unfamiliar nature, the populace expect their President to take charge, to assume stern leadership, and do whatever is necessary.

    This is spelled out in Federalist No. 70, quote-unquote: that the essential nature of the chief executive is his "energy," which "is a leading [element] in the definition of good government. It is essential to the protection of the community against foreign attacks; it is no less essential to the steady administration of the laws; to the protection of property against those irregular and high-handed combinations, which sometimes interrupt the ordinary course of justice; to the security of liberty against the enterprises and assaults of ambition, of faction, and of anarchy."

    Did I answer your question? Ok, good, next...

  8. #8
    So, you are saying the trials of the German sabateurs and terrorists were illegal and unconstitutional?

    And the post war Nuremburg and other war crimes trials were also unconstitutional?

    Do you own it you Nazi sympathizer?

  9. #9
    You want me to, yet I didn't say that, and that's off topic.

    Nuremberg and the rest as illegal trials? The trials violated which laws to make them illegal? Unconstitutional subverting whose constitution? May not be so, but controversial. Why? The indictments were based on ex post facto laws and not in deference to tu quoque defense. Nothing but 'victor's justice' meted out.

    Anyway, all in all war is the most futile of human inventions where at the end there are neither victors nor vanquished - but all bottomline non-winners. It's the most barbaric way to settle disputes, whoever wages it or whether it be in defiance or in retaliation, in a supposedly civilized world.

  10. #10
    OK, we now have it on record that RN disagrees with the Supreme Court on Ex Parte Quirin and the Nuremburg Decision.

    I guess that makes RN a Nazi sympathizer since the SC has spoken on those issues to the detriment of the Nazis.

    And, no, the trial and execution of the German and German American sabateurs was not an ex post facto law.

    So RN, did six million really die? Are you also denying the Holocaust?

Similar Threads

  1. Federale's Immigrant Of The Day
    By federale86 in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-15-2012, 06:28 PM
  2. Federale's Immigrant Of The Day: Another Muslim Immigrant Terrorist
    By federale86 in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-26-2011, 02:44 PM
  3. Federale's Immigrant Of The Day: Jackson M****i
    By federale86 in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-07-2010, 10:32 AM
  4. Federale's Immigrant of the Day: Josue Raul Orozco
    By federale86 in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-19-2010, 02:45 PM
  5. Federale's Immigrant Of The Day: Mother's Day Killer
    By federale86 in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-11-2010, 02:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: