ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Page 1 of 22 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 216

Thread: ***XXOOO***X

  1. #1

  2. #2

  3. #3
    s c u m b a g is the only word I would use for these "people" that insult the dead on 9/11 with disgusting "theories" and obviously have no clue what they are talking about.

  4. #4
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by davdah:
    I'll give the conspirators that WCC 7 dropped under very suspicious circumstances.

    The real question is, where is the plane that hit the pentagon? Even in that two frame video there should have been some visual evidence of the aircraft blowing up on impact. There is a fireball but nothing indicative of what is hitting it. No wings sticking out. No tail section or segment of the long fuselage in either frame. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Fire "dropped" WTC 7. It is very obvious. Only the completely ignorant liars ignore the fact that there was a large fuel storage facility on-site and the impact of the collapsing WTC 1&2 severely damaged the structure as in an earthquake. There was another building, Merrill Lynch building, that was actually "bent" and there was fear of that collapsing on its own even without a fire.

    Anyone who does not know how a camera works is an idiot. Anyone who does know how a camera works knows full well it is like a sequence of pictures; never capturing every moment but with enough frames gives an impression of motion. Security cameras rarely capture full sequences. This is observed in all the gritty 7-11 robberies.

    Stupid people. Stupid immoral ideas.

  5. #5
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by davdah:
    The fires in 7 weren't that severe. The oddity of it is how it went down. With even one or two main supports still intact it would have caused it to fall at an angle and not as if it were professionally demolished as it did. There wasn't an issue with fuel burn in 7. It was on top of an electrical power sub station. A relayer of electricity, not a producer.

    The camera sequencing isn't so debatable as the lack of what should have been in the frames taken. The impact explosion of a plane that size should have revealed one of two things. If the frame were taken prior to full contact of the plane front to back there would be some amount of plane outside the impact zone.
    If it were post full contact there would be a bulge of sorts of the compacted plane against the building and within the explosion zone. Neither of which were there. The amount of interior penetration indicates the plane stopped short of full entry. The second frame should have shown some amount of aircraft regardless the shutter timing with respect to the impact. Not to mention the wings, engines and other items which would have broken free initiating their own trajectories. It does look more like a tomahawk or harpoon missile hit than an airliner. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    The oddity is that you insist on talking about things you know nothing about. I have a degree in Physics. Regardles of what you think (if that word can be used), every rational person knows what happenned. I am not wasting a second arguing stupidity.

  6. #6

  7. #7
    As the world turns!!!
    I Need a vacation!!!
    USC and Legal, Honest Immigrant Alike Must Fight Against Those That Deceive and Disrupt A Place Of Desirability! All Are Victims of Fraud, Both USC and Honest Immigrant Alike! The bad can and does make it more difficult for the good! Be careful who y

  8. #8
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by iperson:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SonofMichael:

    The oddity is that you insist on talking about things you know nothing about. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Not the first time either. I don't know why it took me so long to argue stupidity. It's as hopeless as trying to help Sprint.


    And no, SOM is not Houston. I know. He really does live in Rhode Island. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Sprint is always nasty to me and doing bad things to people

  9. #9
    I Want What everyone else Is Drinking!!!
    USC and Legal, Honest Immigrant Alike Must Fight Against Those That Deceive and Disrupt A Place Of Desirability! All Are Victims of Fraud, Both USC and Honest Immigrant Alike! The bad can and does make it more difficult for the good! Be careful who y

  10. #10
    You really don't know the difference between a direct hit on a 110 story commercial building made from steel and an indirect hit on the second ring of a 5 ringed/5 story reinforced military command center? What does being a pilot have to do with ANYTHING related to this? Have you had that much experience crashing into various building types?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: