ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Illegal Aliens Lawsuit Thrown Out

  1. #1

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Thanks for confirming once again that the 287(g) law is:

    a) Working and
    b) Is how the Federal Government works with the States to apprehend and remove illegal immigrants.

    Given that, why did AZ and AL feel the need to write their own immigration law (which is unconstitutional)?
    "What you see in the photograph isn't what you saw at the time. The real skill of photography is organized visual lying."

  4. #4
    Glad to see No Brain Brit supports deporting illegals.

    If the states can enforce immigration laws how then are the AZ and AL laws unconstitutional?

    S.tupid is as s.tupid does.




  5. #5
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">If the states can enforce immigration laws how then are the AZ and AL laws unconstitutional? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    You need to read up on the Constitution because you clearly don't understand it. Immigration is a Federal matter NOT a State one. You know well that 287(g) was established as a way of States helping the Federal Government enforce EXISTING immigration law.

    The reason AZ and AL Immigration law is unconstitutional is because they go well beyond the 287(g) authorization and attempt to create their own State Immigration law.
    "What you see in the photograph isn't what you saw at the time. The real skill of photography is organized visual lying."

  6. #6
    No Brain Brit doesn't read SCOTUS decisions. It has ruled before that States may enforce immigration laws.

    Read and weep d.umb frak. De Canis v. Bica. States may enforce immigration law.


  7. #7
    Yes enforce EXISTING FEDERAL Law but not exceed it which is what AZ and AL are trying to do. There's a big difference.
    "What you see in the photograph isn't what you saw at the time. The real skill of photography is organized visual lying."

  8. #8
    AZ and AL are just assisting the federal government in enforcing U.S. law. They are arresting illegal aliens and sending them to ICE for removal.

    What is wrong with that?


Similar Threads

  1. Lawsuit challenges illegal immigrant crackdown
    By Webmaster@ILW.COM in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-01-2006, 06:19 AM
  2. Illegal and Lawsuit
    By Talisker in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-16-2006, 01:21 PM
  3. Illegal Aliens.
    By Protoman in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 04-10-2006, 10:04 PM
  4. Depotation/Overstay/Illegal entry/Separation/Illegal Aliens
    By E. in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-22-2004, 07:05 AM
  5. no more illegal aliens
    By in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-14-2003, 10:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: