ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: THE HILL: Specter counters House in move to save immigration bill

  1. #1
    By Jonathan Allen June 22, 2006

    When Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter stepped into the shower yesterday, it was an elusive immigration overhaul, not a slippery bar of soap, that he most hoped to keep within his grasp.

    The Pennsylvania Republican wanted a way to counter the House GOP's unusual post-passage hearings on the bill, which are sure to delay negotiations and give a platform to critics of the Senate's "path to citizenship" for millions of illegal immigrants.

    "I plan to hold some hearings of our own," he told surprised reporters in the Capitol later in the day. "I just developed the idea this morning in the shower."

    Specter says he will start with a field hearing July 5 in Pennsylvania, the state he shares with fellow Republican Sen. Rick Santorum, a leading foe of the bill who is in an uphill reelection bid.

    Specter aims to sway the public rather than directly influence his congressional critics, he said. But his announcement had the feel of a return volley.

    "I don't start wars, but, if I'm forced to, I'll participate," he said.

    The Senate version of the bill combines border security provisions with a guest-worker program and the controversial plan to grant citizenship to illegal immigrants who meet certain requirements.

    The measure is backed by a bipartisan set of senators who maintain that a deal can still be struck. It passed, 62-36, on May 25.

    Opponents argue that the bill's path to citizenship would amount to amnesty for people who broke the law to get into the country.

    Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), who voted against the bill, said he would consider attending Specter's field hearings.

    "A good place to have it would be in Arizona," Kyl said.

    "The more information the better," said Amy Call, spokeswoman for Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), who supported the Senate bill.

    The House version of the measure, passed in December, focuses solely on border protection, and many conservatives in both chambers are dead-set against the Senate's citizenship provisions.

    The stalemate has been reinforced by procedural objections, foremost a House threat to "blue slip," or kill, the Senate version on the grounds that only the House can originate changes to tax law.

    Most observers interpreted Tuesday's announcement that the House would hold hearings as a concession from GOP leaders that they cannot enact a law before the November election.
    But Specter said there is still time.

    "I don't think it's a death knell," he said, noting that deals can be struck quickly in the Capitol.

    42
    Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) said that his position is somewhere between the House and Senate bills and that he believes negotiators can find common ground.

    "I think there is a sweet spot out there," Lott said. "If they'll come see me, I'll tell 'em how we can solve it."

    House Republican leaders said Tuesday that hearings would allow them to amplify objections to the Senate measure.

    The decision was announced after Speaker Dennis Hastert and other GOP leaders held a closed-door meeting with several committee chairmen.

    Specter said his hearings are not intended to delay an overhaul that he supports.


    "I'm doing it to develop a broader factual evidentiary record on the need for a comprehensive bill," he said.


    The hearings will be targeted at the public, he said, adding, "That's what will influence the legislative process."

    One Pennsylvanian who already agrees with Specter on the immigration bill is Santorum's November opponent, state Treasurer Bob Casey Jr.
    Santorum trailed Casey, 52 to 34 percent, in a poll of 1,076 Pennsylvania voters released yesterday by Quinnipiac University.

    In the same poll, 52 percent said they approve of the way Specter is handling his job as senator but only 38 percent said the same of Santorum.

    "I think Senator Santorum is stating his own views, and I respect them," Specter said, noting that he does not think hearings will "impact significantly on the issue in the campaign for him."


    Rep. Tom Feeney (R-Fla.), who became close to Santorum as a College Republican at Penn State University in the late 1970s, said discussion of the Senate immigration bill will cut to Santorum's benefit.


    "We need to stand back and let Americans understand what the Senate bill does," Feeney said. "The Senate bill is a travesty."
    43

  2. #2
    By Jonathan Allen June 22, 2006

    When Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter stepped into the shower yesterday, it was an elusive immigration overhaul, not a slippery bar of soap, that he most hoped to keep within his grasp.

    The Pennsylvania Republican wanted a way to counter the House GOP's unusual post-passage hearings on the bill, which are sure to delay negotiations and give a platform to critics of the Senate's "path to citizenship" for millions of illegal immigrants.

    "I plan to hold some hearings of our own," he told surprised reporters in the Capitol later in the day. "I just developed the idea this morning in the shower."

    Specter says he will start with a field hearing July 5 in Pennsylvania, the state he shares with fellow Republican Sen. Rick Santorum, a leading foe of the bill who is in an uphill reelection bid.

    Specter aims to sway the public rather than directly influence his congressional critics, he said. But his announcement had the feel of a return volley.

    "I don't start wars, but, if I'm forced to, I'll participate," he said.

    The Senate version of the bill combines border security provisions with a guest-worker program and the controversial plan to grant citizenship to illegal immigrants who meet certain requirements.

    The measure is backed by a bipartisan set of senators who maintain that a deal can still be struck. It passed, 62-36, on May 25.

    Opponents argue that the bill's path to citizenship would amount to amnesty for people who broke the law to get into the country.

    Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), who voted against the bill, said he would consider attending Specter's field hearings.

    "A good place to have it would be in Arizona," Kyl said.

    "The more information the better," said Amy Call, spokeswoman for Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), who supported the Senate bill.

    The House version of the measure, passed in December, focuses solely on border protection, and many conservatives in both chambers are dead-set against the Senate's citizenship provisions.

    The stalemate has been reinforced by procedural objections, foremost a House threat to "blue slip," or kill, the Senate version on the grounds that only the House can originate changes to tax law.

    Most observers interpreted Tuesday's announcement that the House would hold hearings as a concession from GOP leaders that they cannot enact a law before the November election.
    But Specter said there is still time.

    "I don't think it's a death knell," he said, noting that deals can be struck quickly in the Capitol.

    42
    Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) said that his position is somewhere between the House and Senate bills and that he believes negotiators can find common ground.

    "I think there is a sweet spot out there," Lott said. "If they'll come see me, I'll tell 'em how we can solve it."

    House Republican leaders said Tuesday that hearings would allow them to amplify objections to the Senate measure.

    The decision was announced after Speaker Dennis Hastert and other GOP leaders held a closed-door meeting with several committee chairmen.

    Specter said his hearings are not intended to delay an overhaul that he supports.


    "I'm doing it to develop a broader factual evidentiary record on the need for a comprehensive bill," he said.


    The hearings will be targeted at the public, he said, adding, "That's what will influence the legislative process."

    One Pennsylvanian who already agrees with Specter on the immigration bill is Santorum's November opponent, state Treasurer Bob Casey Jr.
    Santorum trailed Casey, 52 to 34 percent, in a poll of 1,076 Pennsylvania voters released yesterday by Quinnipiac University.

    In the same poll, 52 percent said they approve of the way Specter is handling his job as senator but only 38 percent said the same of Santorum.

    "I think Senator Santorum is stating his own views, and I respect them," Specter said, noting that he does not think hearings will "impact significantly on the issue in the campaign for him."


    Rep. Tom Feeney (R-Fla.), who became close to Santorum as a College Republican at Penn State University in the late 1970s, said discussion of the Senate immigration bill will cut to Santorum's benefit.


    "We need to stand back and let Americans understand what the Senate bill does," Feeney said. "The Senate bill is a travesty."
    43

  3. #3
    "I plan to hold some hearings of our own," he told surprised reporters in the Capitol later in the day. "I just developed the idea this morning in the shower."

    hahahahaha!! man, i love arlen specter..i must admit he's by far my favorit lawmaker whenever i watch c-span..i just enjoy watching him speack....

    Anyway, great move to counter with hearing of his own and attacking the felony charges and this mass deportation theory.

    And the good thing about it is, specter is a republicans, which means that there is no way sensenbrenner could use this to say GOP are united for the enforcement only bill so voters would be confuse even if they support enforcement only...

    also, the house republican have renamed the haguel/martinez bill and named it the " reed/kennedy bill to show republicans that its indeed the democrats that wants amnesty, BUT WITH A FELLOW REPUBLICANS LEADING THE CHARGE, THEY WONT LOOK AS UNITED AS THEY WOULD LIKE TO GET MORE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS.

    GREAT JOB HASTERT.

  4. #4
    "I don't start wars, but, if I'm forced to, I'll participate," he said.

    HAHAHAHAH, ANOTHER GREAT QUOTE...YOU NEVER LET A MAN SLAP WITH WITHOUT ANSWERING

    THE HOUSE GOP MASTER PLANNING WAS TO GO TO THE MOST CONSERVATIVE STATES AND CRITIZISE THE SENATE BILL.....NOW, THE SENATE WILL ALSO GO ON THE ROAD IN MODERATE STATES AND TELL THE PUBLIC, SPECIAL THE LATINO VOTERS, HOW EVIL THE HOUSE MEMBERS ARE....HAHAHAHAHAH WAY TO GO SPECTER.

  5. #5
    Santorum trailed Casey, 52 to 34 percent, in a poll of 1,076 Pennsylvania voters released yesterday by Quinnipiac University. In the same poll, 52 percent said they approve of the way Specter is handling his job as senator but only 38 percent said the same of Santorum.

    sSantorum is the hard liners whyle specter is the amnesty guy huh?? look at the polls and you will see that specter is much more beloved in PA then santorum who will definatly lose to casey..

    AHAHAHA

    I WANT THIS TO BACKFIRE IN THEIR FACES

  6. #6
    f-u-c-k off Iperson and definitely f-u-c-k off Illegal Jean...........the bill is dead so the only hope you have is false hope

  7. #7
    f-u-c-k off Iperson and definitely f-u-c-k off Illegal Jean...........the bill is dead so the only hope you have is false hope
    I take it, you physically look like a bobble head with a large craneal cavity void a synoptic membranes.
    "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams on Defense of the boston Massacre

Similar Threads

  1. New immigration bill "save america comprehensive reform"
    By Hopeful1981 in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 08:37 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-27-2009, 10:51 AM
  3. Specter shoots for new immigration bill
    By marikan in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-19-2006, 04:00 AM
  4. Specter's Immigration Reforem Bill??
    By taxreg16 in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-10-2006, 07:16 AM
  5. specter new immigration bill
    By albatross23 in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 92
    Last Post: 03-01-2006, 02:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: