ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The Heartbreak of a Defective Immigration System

  1. #1
    The heartbreak of a defective immigration system
    By Priscilla Labovitz

    October 17, 2007

    On Halloween, one of my two girls will be deported to Venezuela. The other will return from a three-week trek in the wilderness to her satisfying career as a social worker.

    Amy, born in Boston in 1980, grew up with two parents, graduated from a Montgomery County high school and a liberal arts college in New England, earned a master's in social work and climbs rocks with at-risk kids. Emily, also born in 1980, was kidnapped from her mother in Trinidad at age 8 and taken by her Nigerian father to the U.S., where he started a new family and then left the country; his whereabouts are unknown. Her mother is out of the picture as well.

    Emily, too, graduated from a Montgomery County high school, where she was a cartoonist for its award-winning newspaper. She couldn't go to college because she was undocumented, ineligible for financial aid and not authorized to work. Instead, she volunteered in public kindergarten to learn the trade and managed to take a few courses at Montgomery College in early childhood education. Today, she is a highly regarded preschool teacher with two weeks left in the only life she knows.

    I am Amy's mother and, for the last six years, Emily's lawyer. We've tried everything I could find in the law to prevent Emily's deportation: labor certification (on appeal); special immigrant juvenile status (denied); continuances in immigration court (no more); deferred action, a discretionary status that the Department of Homeland Security has refused; and an order of supervision, which runs out Oct. 31.

    It hasn't always been this way. Immigration judges and immigration officials have for decades had the authority to show mercy in appropriate cases. But in 1996, Congress took away that power. Now only the office of Detention and Removal Operations can exercise discretion to extend Emily's stay indefinitely. This month, however, the office denied her an extension, stating that "compelling circumstances ... do not exist in this case."

    The only place where Emily can be deported is Venezuela - the country of her birth - where she doesn't know a soul and has no prospects. What's more, the State Department has classified Venezuela as a "Tier 3" country that makes little effort to stop trafficking in women. It is not to Emily's advantage that she is tall, willowy and beautiful.

    I read that many Americans say those who haven't immigrated legally don't belong here - that for them to remain here isn't fair. Is it fair that Emily was born to a kidnapper and has tried every legal means to remain here - while Amy had the luck to be born in this country? Is it fair that a federal agency in downtown Baltimore has the choice to allow Emily to stay here and deport criminals instead, and just says no?

    I am not saying that everyone who manages to get into our country should be allowed to stay. But something is terribly wrong with a system that ejects people who have done nothing wrong and whom tragic circumstances have prevented from making meaningful contributions to our society. There is something wrong with officials so callous that they refuse to use the flexibility they have to save a guiltless young woman.

    We need better leadership at the Department of Homeland Security. We need people who can see in Emily's story "compelling circumstances."

    Priscilla Labovitz practices immigration law in Washington. Her e-mail is labovitz@earthlink.net.

  2. #2
    The heartbreak of a defective immigration system
    By Priscilla Labovitz

    October 17, 2007

    On Halloween, one of my two girls will be deported to Venezuela. The other will return from a three-week trek in the wilderness to her satisfying career as a social worker.

    Amy, born in Boston in 1980, grew up with two parents, graduated from a Montgomery County high school and a liberal arts college in New England, earned a master's in social work and climbs rocks with at-risk kids. Emily, also born in 1980, was kidnapped from her mother in Trinidad at age 8 and taken by her Nigerian father to the U.S., where he started a new family and then left the country; his whereabouts are unknown. Her mother is out of the picture as well.

    Emily, too, graduated from a Montgomery County high school, where she was a cartoonist for its award-winning newspaper. She couldn't go to college because she was undocumented, ineligible for financial aid and not authorized to work. Instead, she volunteered in public kindergarten to learn the trade and managed to take a few courses at Montgomery College in early childhood education. Today, she is a highly regarded preschool teacher with two weeks left in the only life she knows.

    I am Amy's mother and, for the last six years, Emily's lawyer. We've tried everything I could find in the law to prevent Emily's deportation: labor certification (on appeal); special immigrant juvenile status (denied); continuances in immigration court (no more); deferred action, a discretionary status that the Department of Homeland Security has refused; and an order of supervision, which runs out Oct. 31.

    It hasn't always been this way. Immigration judges and immigration officials have for decades had the authority to show mercy in appropriate cases. But in 1996, Congress took away that power. Now only the office of Detention and Removal Operations can exercise discretion to extend Emily's stay indefinitely. This month, however, the office denied her an extension, stating that "compelling circumstances ... do not exist in this case."

    The only place where Emily can be deported is Venezuela - the country of her birth - where she doesn't know a soul and has no prospects. What's more, the State Department has classified Venezuela as a "Tier 3" country that makes little effort to stop trafficking in women. It is not to Emily's advantage that she is tall, willowy and beautiful.

    I read that many Americans say those who haven't immigrated legally don't belong here - that for them to remain here isn't fair. Is it fair that Emily was born to a kidnapper and has tried every legal means to remain here - while Amy had the luck to be born in this country? Is it fair that a federal agency in downtown Baltimore has the choice to allow Emily to stay here and deport criminals instead, and just says no?

    I am not saying that everyone who manages to get into our country should be allowed to stay. But something is terribly wrong with a system that ejects people who have done nothing wrong and whom tragic circumstances have prevented from making meaningful contributions to our society. There is something wrong with officials so callous that they refuse to use the flexibility they have to save a guiltless young woman.

    We need better leadership at the Department of Homeland Security. We need people who can see in Emily's story "compelling circumstances."

    Priscilla Labovitz practices immigration law in Washington. Her e-mail is labovitz@earthlink.net.

  3. #3
    We do not need more children born out of wedlock in this country !!! Their parents didn't want them, why should we ?? GET OUT !

  4. #4
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">The heartbreak of a defective immigration system </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Defective is an understatement!

  5. #5
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SonofMichael:
    We do not need more children born out of wedlock in this country !!! Their parents didn't want them, why should we ?? GET OUT ! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>



    Darkforce, Get off the drugs. You're totally out of touch with reality.

Similar Threads

  1. Experts: Immigration system broken
    By Webmaster@ILW.COM in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-24-2006, 11:30 AM
  2. What if they have wrong input in their system?
    By Taf in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-22-2006, 04:18 PM
  3. Is this the new system or what?
    By Tai in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-26-2005, 10:39 PM
  4. IF YOU DON'T LIKE OUR SYSTEM THEN GET OUT !
    By Michael in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-26-2004, 10:55 AM
  5. Some news from me: W32.Welchia attacks US Immigration system
    By Bushmaster in forum Immigration Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-24-2003, 08:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: