Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama's Aunt: Biggest Immigration Story of the Century!!!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama's Aunt: Biggest Immigration Story of the Century!!!

    (Sept. 21) -- As Congress prepares to re-initiate the stalled immigration reform debate this week, one very personal immigration issue looks poised to hit the president close to home.

    President Barack Obama's aunt, Zeituni Onyango, says she's done nothing wrong by illegally living in the United States for years and is therefore deserving of amnesty.

    "If I come as an immigrant, you have the obligation to make me a citizen," Onyango, 58, told Boston's WBZ news.

    In her first interview since Obama was elected president, Onyango described how she came to America in 2000 from her native Kenya, fell ill and was hospitalized. Upon her release, Onyango told WBZ, she was out of money. So rather than return to her homeland, she continued to live in the country in violation of immigration laws.

    After stints in a Boston homeless shelter, Onyango was eventually put in public housing and began receiving disability payments. In 2004, an immigration judge ordered her to leave the country, but Onyango remained. However, she noted that her story was less about intentionally flouting federal immigration policy and more about its ineffectiveness.

    "I didn't take advantage of the system," Onyango said. "The system took advantage of me."

    Onyango says that she received no help from Obama as her case was reviewed by Judge Leonard Shapiro, who ruled in May that Onyango could remain in the United States.

    <span class="flash-video"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000"
    codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0"
    width="640"
    height="385"
    ><param name="wmode"
    value="transparent"
    ></param><param name="allowScriptAccess"
    value="never"
    ></param><param value="transparent"
    /><param value="never"
    /><param name="movie"
    value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nKdUu6zwDiI?fs=1&hl=en_US"
    /><param value="true"
    /><param value="always"
    /><embed pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"
    wmode="transparent"
    type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    allowScriptAccess="never"
    src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nKdUu6zwDiI?fs=1&hl=en_US"
    width="640"
    height="385"
    /></object></span>

  • #2
    (Sept. 21) -- As Congress prepares to re-initiate the stalled immigration reform debate this week, one very personal immigration issue looks poised to hit the president close to home.

    President Barack Obama's aunt, Zeituni Onyango, says she's done nothing wrong by illegally living in the United States for years and is therefore deserving of amnesty.

    "If I come as an immigrant, you have the obligation to make me a citizen," Onyango, 58, told Boston's WBZ news.

    In her first interview since Obama was elected president, Onyango described how she came to America in 2000 from her native Kenya, fell ill and was hospitalized. Upon her release, Onyango told WBZ, she was out of money. So rather than return to her homeland, she continued to live in the country in violation of immigration laws.

    After stints in a Boston homeless shelter, Onyango was eventually put in public housing and began receiving disability payments. In 2004, an immigration judge ordered her to leave the country, but Onyango remained. However, she noted that her story was less about intentionally flouting federal immigration policy and more about its ineffectiveness.

    "I didn't take advantage of the system," Onyango said. "The system took advantage of me."

    Onyango says that she received no help from Obama as her case was reviewed by Judge Leonard Shapiro, who ruled in May that Onyango could remain in the United States.

    <span class="flash-video"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000"
    codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0"
    width="640"
    height="385"
    ><param name="wmode"
    value="transparent"
    ></param><param name="allowScriptAccess"
    value="never"
    ></param><param value="transparent"
    /><param value="never"
    /><param name="movie"
    value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nKdUu6zwDiI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"
    /><param value="true"
    /><param value="always"
    /><embed pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"
    wmode="transparent"
    type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    allowScriptAccess="never"
    src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nKdUu6zwDiI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"
    width="640"
    height="385"
    /></object></span>

    Comment


    • #3
      Obligated? Just say NO.

      How the h.eck is she colletcing disability being an illegal.? Why cant she go home, all her relatives are there.

      Why cant her affluent relative Obama take care of her at least while she is here so that she doesnt use our tax dollars or take away help that should be given to a legal person.

      This arrogant display of entitlement makes me wanna pu.ke. Where is that pitbull when you need him Unique

      Woman is Disgraceful

      Comment


      • #4
        It will be interesting to see if the President will actually face this issue head on. My guess is that he will avoid it at some length, because it's a no-win for him. Support her in violation of policy and be guilty of favoring her, or turn her away and come off as a bad family member?
        Always interested in the H1-B visa, the Eb-5 Visa Program and other Eb5 Investor Visa related issues.

        Comment


        • #5
          <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Where is that pitbull when you need him Unique </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

          He's only interested in Rush Limbaugh

          Comment


          • #6
            I can’t believe this post is receiving so little attention. This is the biggest immigration story of the century.

            Comment


            • #7
              Unique, you need to get a clue that most posters left on this forum could give a rat's behind what happens to immigrants. Very sad.

              Comment


              • #8
                <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by unique:
                I can’t believe this post is receiving so little attention. This is the biggest immigration story of the century. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


                Unique, you know that most of the regular posters here are pro illegal immigration. They have nothing to say on the matter.

                Yes it was very sad that Proud didnt care about those "immigrants" that used identity theft to work for their company. After all they had to let them go. Very sad not to care and keep them employed anyway even though they were immigrants. Since the usa is obligated to take care of immigrants and give them citizenship.


                Where is that pitbull that throws up while having s.ex....we need you

                Comment


                • #9
                  <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by 4now:
                  <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by unique:
                  I can’t believe this post is receiving so little attention. This is the biggest immigration story of the century. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


                  Unique, you know that most of the regular posters here are pro illegal immigration. They have nothing to say on the matter.

                  Yes it was very sad that Proud didnt care about those "immigrants" that used identity theft to work for their company. After all they had to let them go. Very sad not to care and keep them employed anyway even though they were immigrants. Since the usa is obligated to take care of immigrants and give them citizenship.


                  Where is that pitbull that throws up while having s.ex....we need you </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                  If you lump me up to those whom you refer to as a pro illegal immigration, then that's another one of your twisted views. Pro-CIR like me are clamoring for change from the current broken setup such that the illegalities would stop. Whereas, pro status quo like yourself don't see anything wrong and want everything to be conducted like business as usual. Which between your camp and mine is pro illegal immigration?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:
                    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by 4now:
                    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by unique:
                    I can’t believe this post is receiving so little attention. This is the biggest immigration story of the century. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


                    Unique, you know that most of the regular posters here are pro illegal immigration. They have nothing to say on the matter.

                    Yes it was very sad that Proud didnt care about those "immigrants" that used identity theft to work for their company. After all they had to let them go. Very sad not to care and keep them employed anyway even though they were immigrants. Since the usa is obligated to take care of immigrants and give them citizenship.


                    Where is that pitbull that throws up while having s.ex....we need you </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                    If you lump me up to those whom you refer to as a pro illegal immigration, then that's another one of your twisted views. Pro-CIR like me are clamoring for change from the current broken setup such that the illegalities would stop. Whereas, pro status quo like yourself don't see anything wrong and want everything to be conducted like business as usual. Which between your camp and mine is pro illegal immigration? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


                    Nope.. not business as usual. I already stated that there should be an immigration reform. We do not need a comprehensive Imm reform at this time. make a bill that addresses the problems of legal residents and it will push thru no problem.

                    In the mean time. Let us get everify totally up and running for all employment, welfare benefits and federal benefits. let us further integrate the databases across the nation. Put an end to birthright to children of illegals. Review and fix requirements for the welfare benefits of usc children of illegals. Put them under the same standard that a legal resident would be under with usc children. this is just for starters. This would fix a lot of problems and things would start to take care of themselves. No I am not for status quo as you are implying. If those changes take place, they will not stay as they are.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      E-Verify as a voluntary program was already struck down by The Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit in Lozano v. Hazleton as unconstitutional to be enforced compulsorily (in a split with the 9th Circuit), which the SCOTUS would surely concur (with the 3rd Circuit ruling) considering the current composition of justices sometime next year.

                      Whereas the repeal of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution is more of a political posturing than a realistic legislative initiative that would see the light of day. And its proponents know this for a fact. Again, see above why the SCOTUS won't allow such a thing to happen.

                      Translation: a string of impossibilities = status quo.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by 4now:
                        <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by unique:
                        I can’t believe this post is receiving so little attention. This is the biggest immigration story of the century. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


                        Unique, you know that most of the regular posters here are pro illegal immigration. They have nothing to say on the matter.

                        Yes it was very sad that Proud didnt care about those "immigrants" that used identity theft to work for their company. After all they had to let them go. Very sad not to care and keep them employed anyway even though they were immigrants. Since the usa is obligated to take care of immigrants and give them citizenship.


                        Where is that pitbull that throws up while having s.ex....we need you </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                        So much for keeping PM stuff private, eh 4Now?

                        For those with reading comprehension problems, once again, I had NOTHING to do with the hire/fire decisions at the company (I no longer work for). So, why can't you guys come up with some more recent stuff to toss my way? Dragging up the same old sht has gotten boring.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by davdah:
                          I'm not necessarily defending the hiring of illegals. However, if your an employer and the person presents what appear to be legitimate documents you're required to accept them on face value.

                          Unless you're using E-verify, it takes the better part of a year before you get a tax payer identity discrepancy form letting you know they weren't so legal after all. By then the illegal is long gone. You can bet they know the mailing schedule of those forms better than most employers.

                          This is one reason why E-verify should and will eventually become law of the land. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                          But illegal or not, you still withheld taxes, right? It didn't matter in our case either. Taxes were withheld without question of one's status. Put that in your crack pipe and smoke it, S12!!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ProudUSC:
                            <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by 4now:
                            <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by unique:
                            I can’t believe this post is receiving so little attention. This is the biggest immigration story of the century. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


                            Unique, you know that most of the regular posters here are pro illegal immigration. They have nothing to say on the matter.

                            Yes it was very sad that Proud didnt care about those "immigrants" that used identity theft to work for their company. After all they had to let them go. Very sad not to care and keep them employed anyway even though they were immigrants. Since the usa is obligated to take care of immigrants and give them citizenship.


                            Where is that pitbull that throws up while having s.ex....we need you </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                            So much for keeping PM stuff private, eh 4Now?

                            For those with reading comprehension problems, once again, I had NOTHING to do with the hire/fire decisions at the company (I no longer work for). So, why can't you guys come up with some more recent stuff to toss my way? Dragging up the same old sht has gotten boring. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>



                            What are you smoking lady? I have never divulged pm information on this board or shared pm with other members. Something that you cant boast on because it has already been proven otherwise. Private means private with me.

                            My information comes from your own public admission and from S12 relentlessly poking you about hiring illegals which you dont deny but offer explanation for, not once, but many many times whenever he brings it up.

                            Maybe this will jog your memory


                            <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">
                            Posted 09-01-2009 08:35 AM Hide Post
                            quote:
                            Originally posted by Someone12:
                            gee Proud....why do you care what laws are for? You hire illegal aliens....what's another pesky rule or regulation to you?

                            <span class="ev_code_BLUE">Proudusc response</span>:

                            Not that I have to explain, but I did not hire them (I didn't work here when they were hired). They were hired using fake documents and at the time, E-Verify wasn't being pushed. Only found out some time later. And, bottom line is they are no longer with our company. However, they were excellent employees.

                            As far as laws and rules, I've never even gotten a speeding ticket. Can you say the same is true for yourself??? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


                            This is just one of many back and forths between you and S12 on the subject

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by 4now:
                              <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ProudUSC:
                              <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by 4now:
                              <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by unique:
                              I can’t believe this post is receiving so little attention. This is the biggest immigration story of the century. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


                              Unique, you know that most of the regular posters here are pro illegal immigration. They have nothing to say on the matter.

                              Yes it was very sad that Proud didnt care about those "immigrants" that used identity theft to work for their company. After all they had to let them go. Very sad not to care and keep them employed anyway even though they were immigrants. Since the usa is obligated to take care of immigrants and give them citizenship.


                              Where is that pitbull that throws up while having s.ex....we need you </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                              So much for keeping PM stuff private, eh 4Now?

                              For those with reading comprehension problems, once again, I had NOTHING to do with the hire/fire decisions at the company (I no longer work for). So, why can't you guys come up with some more recent stuff to toss my way? Dragging up the same old sht has gotten boring. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>



                              What are you smoking lady? I have never divulged pm information on this board or shared pm with other members. Something that you cant boast on because it has already been proven otherwise. Private means private with me.

                              My information comes from your own public admission and from S12 relentlessly poking you about hiring illegals which you dont deny but offer explanation for, not once, but many many times whenever he brings it up.

                              Maybe this will jog your memory


                              <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">
                              Posted 09-01-2009 08:35 AM Hide Post
                              quote:
                              Originally posted by Someone12:
                              gee Proud....why do you care what laws are for? You hire illegal aliens....what's another pesky rule or regulation to you?

                              <span class="ev_code_BLUE">Proudusc response</span>:

                              Not that I have to explain, but I did not hire them (I didn't work here when they were hired). They were hired using fake documents and at the time, E-Verify wasn't being pushed. Only found out some time later. And, bottom line is they are no longer with our company. However, they were excellent employees.

                              As far as laws and rules, I've never even gotten a speeding ticket. Can you say the same is true for yourself??? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


                              This is just one of many back and forths between you and S12 on the subject </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                              Okay. My apologies. I didn't remember putting this information out in public. Anyway, I'm not a part of any of that now, so I wish people would drop the subject. I was never guilty of hiring illegals and I'm sick to death of being accused as such.

                              Comment



                              Working...
                              X