Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

America Haters, Not So Fast On SB1070

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • America Haters, Not So Fast On SB1070

    Judge's decision says that police may still enforce federal immigration law.

    The ruling says that law enforcement still must enforce federal immigration laws to the fullest extent of the law when SB 1070 goes into effect at 12:01 a.m. Thursday. Individuals will still be able to sue an agency if they adopt a policy that restricts such enforcement...

    The governor deferred answering specific questions about the impact of the ruling to her attorneys. For example, Bolton let the part of SB 1070 that requires agencies to enforce federal immigration law to the fullest extent of the law to stand, but enjoined the part about allowing officers to question an individual's legal status.

  • #2
    Judge's decision says that police may still enforce federal immigration law.

    The ruling says that law enforcement still must enforce federal immigration laws to the fullest extent of the law when SB 1070 goes into effect at 12:01 a.m. Thursday. Individuals will still be able to sue an agency if they adopt a policy that restricts such enforcement...

    The governor deferred answering specific questions about the impact of the ruling to her attorneys. For example, Bolton let the part of SB 1070 that requires agencies to enforce federal immigration law to the fullest extent of the law to stand, but enjoined the part about allowing officers to question an individual's legal status.

    Comment


    • #3
      Judges too are humans. District Judge Susan Bolton just straddled the shaky centerline in passing her ruling between what's legal and what's emotional. Indeed, there's a great majority of Arizonans that supported the 'emotional' aspect of SB 1070, but unfortunately, a democracy doesn't survive on emotions. The US Constitution always ultimately rules. That's what it's there for.

      Comment


      • #4
        And so? It's the FEDERAL LAW she's talking about fedBUT. No big news there. The unconstitutional aspects and the emotional part (reasonable suspicion) as RN puts it have been blocked and rightly so. It would have led to institutionally sanctioned racism had it been allowed to go ahead.
        "What you see in the photograph isn't what you saw at the time. The real skill of photography is organized visual lying."

        Comment


        • #5
          She is nothing more than Billyjeff Bent******'s b.itch. And you are too. LOL, another Paki jihadi taking it up the b.ut.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hehe! Can't get over it. But hey, you have your uncle Joe! remember?

            Comment


            • #7
              <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by federale86:
              Judge's decision says that police may still enforce federal immigration law.

              The ruling says that law enforcement still must enforce federal immigration laws to the fullest extent of the law when SB 1070 goes into effect at 12:01 a.m. Thursday. Individuals will still be able to sue an agency if they adopt a policy that restricts such enforcement...

              The governor deferred answering specific questions about the impact of the ruling to her attorneys. For example, Bolton let the part of SB 1070 that requires agencies to enforce federal immigration law to the fullest extent of the law to stand, but enjoined the part about allowing officers to question an individual's legal status. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

              The outcome will ultimately be decided after the end of appeals process. How far will it go? Will SCOTUS consider the case?

              Under old precedents there are couple of issues of contention: 1. State exceeds Federal statutory limits by designating illegal precence per se in AZ as a crime (as opposed to being a civil administrative violation under Federal code) AND 2. State has no authority over Federal Government on immigration matters, thus # 1 can be held invalid.

              But this is only under older interpretations of regulations and delegated powers, by pre-Justice Roberts SCOTUS.

              Historically, public opinion is a force that one or another way effects judiciary , and not just by electing Presidents and Congress who appoint and confirm justices but more directly by creating a sense of urgency which finds it's reflection on any major rulings.

              Soon everyone will see where it's going to.
              http://www.anbsoft.com/images/usflag_med.jpg

              "...I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibit

              Comment


              • #8
                RN has the uncle Joe, Joe Stalin. Commie, pinko, q.ueer.

                Comment



                Working...
                X