Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

this Immigration reform talk by obama's white house

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • this Immigration reform talk by obama's white house

    Hello,

    I am unlawful present 90 days already. No removal order yet. I have no criminal record. I only made a big mistake. Is Obama's immigration reform (hypothetically speaking) for undocumented people only? unfortunately, uscis has all my information because i had b2 visa recorded at port of entry. If I leave now, I get 3 year bar.

  • #2
    Hello,

    I am unlawful present 90 days already. No removal order yet. I have no criminal record. I only made a big mistake. Is Obama's immigration reform (hypothetically speaking) for undocumented people only? unfortunately, uscis has all my information because i had b2 visa recorded at port of entry. If I leave now, I get 3 year bar.

    Comment


    • #3
      davdah wrote:
      >You're still under 180 days which is when the >3 yr ban kicks in. Best bet is to leave while >you still can without a ban.

      thanks. i doubt that i will be able to re-enter, even if i left in less than 180 days. us border patrol would be very suspicious.

      Comment


      • #4
        <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by nonfixcion:
        Hello,

        I am unlawful present 90 days already. No removal order yet. I have no criminal record. I only made a big mistake. Is Obama's immigration reform (hypothetically speaking) for undocumented people only? unfortunately, uscis has all my information because i had b2 visa recorded at port of entry. If I leave now, I get 3 year bar. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

        Sorry, but I don't think immigration reform is a hot button issue for Obama right now. He's dealing with bigger issues. We need to get the US economy back to a healthier state before tackling other things.

        Comment


        • #5
          Leaving now, it won't be impossible for you to re-enter. Stay longer and it will.

          Your choice.

          Waiting for an amnesty that may never happen (don't forget that it didn't get past a mostly democrat congress prior to the election) would be a bigger mistake than the one you've already made.
          **************************************
          The whole of life is but a moment of time. It is our duty, therefore to use it, not to misuse it - Plutarch

          Comment


          • #6
            Yes, you will be covered by the amnesty. Do NOT leave. Stay for the amnesty. Do NOT go to any more hearings. You are safe.

            Comment


            • #7
              STAY!!!! Party, have a few.

              Did I mention I have 1 kidney for sale??
              better Get It Before I Put It On Cra igs!!!
              USC and Legal, Honest Immigrant Alike Must Fight Against Those That Deceive and Disrupt A Place Of Desirability! All Are Victims of Fraud, Both USC and Honest Immigrant Alike! The bad can and does make it more difficult for the good! Be careful who y

              Comment


              • #8
                <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by federale86:
                Yes, you will be covered by the amnesty. Do NOT leave. Stay for the amnesty. Do NOT go to any more hearings. You are safe. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                Please don't listen to this advice. He's just pulling your leg.

                Comment


                • #9
                  NonFixcion: Well, for starters, your name is not at all accurate, given the FICTION that you told to America's Customs and Border Protection officials at the port of entry - and also to the Consular officer who issued you with your B-1/B-2 visa.

                  Obviously, you had zero intention of honoring your commitment, and evidently intended to immigrate to America illegally.

                  The American people are opposed to amnesty for liars and cheats...as they demonstrated when they prevented the intended amnesty in 2007.

                  If you believe that amnesty will pass anytime soon...then, quite honestly, you're not smart enough to be immigrating to America.

                  Your best bet, even at this late stage, would be to cut your losses and leave the United States before you're subject to an automatic bar against reentry. Your options going forward only get worse and worse.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Nice comments.
                    ==================
                    John Assam
                    lawyer directory

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by lawyer directory:
                      Nice comments.
                      ==================
                      John Assam
                      lawyer directory </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                      Why Not Stay and participate???
                      USC and Legal, Honest Immigrant Alike Must Fight Against Those That Deceive and Disrupt A Place Of Desirability! All Are Victims of Fraud, Both USC and Honest Immigrant Alike! The bad can and does make it more difficult for the good! Be careful who y

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Pro-immigration group's study contends immigrants don't impact unemployment
                        State economist questions study's methods, but agrees with some conclusions

                        By Sheena Mcfarland

                        The Salt Lake Tribune
                        Updated: 05/20/2009 06:36:11 AM MDT

                        Contrary to conventional wisdom -- and anti-illegal immigration rhetoric -- immigration rates have no direct effect on unemployment rates, according to a study released Tuesday.

                        The study was conducted by the Center for Immigration Policy, the research arm of the pro-immigration American Immigration Law Foundation. It compared rates of unemployment with immigration rates in states across the nation, and found no direct correlation.

                        "The level of unemployment in the U.S. is painful, sometimes scary and very difficult for those directly impacted," said Dan Siciliano, executive director of the Program in Law, Economics and Business at Stanford Law School and a research fellow for the Washington, D.C.-based center. "But the notion that immigration is causally related to unemployment belittles and questions the challenges of unemployment."

                        The study included legal and illegal immigration.

                        The center conducted the research in response to anti-illegal immigration groups blaming immigrants for high unemployment. The study's author cites unemployment rates that are about the same in the Pacific states and the East North Central states, although the rate of incoming "recent immigrants" --those arriving within the past 10 years -- is significantly higher in California than in Illinois.

                        "We wanted to lay out the situation and dispel these notions," said lead author and demographer Rob Paral. "We wanted to untie this knot made between immigrants
                        Advertisement
                        and unemployment."

                        Mark Knold, chief economist at the Utah Department of Workforce Services questions the study itself, saying that immigration rates can not fairly be compared with unemployment rates. The reason for this is that if a family of five, for example, immigrated here, only one or two members may be seeking employment.

                        "The unemployment rate is dictated by those who are actively looking for work," Knold said.

                        However, he does agree with other pieces of the study, including the finding that an immigrant population can serve as a lubricant for a stalling economy.

                        The study's author say immigrant populations are inherently more mobile, which means they can move to where the jobs are.

                        "You're not going to round up laid-off workers in Michigan and put them on buses to agricultural fields in California," Siciliano said. "Having autoworkers picking lettuce is an absurd story."

                        They argue that the economy is not a club where you can kick out those you don't want -- immigrants -- to let others -- namely unemployed, U.S.-born workers -- take those positions.

                        One anti-illegal immigration group, Save Utah, has created a program designed to honor employers who hire only workers legally able to work in the country. A business owner signs a pledge to hire only legal workers, and the group prints a certificate to hang up. But only half a dozen businesses have signed up since it launched earlier this year.

                        In Utah, the 2008 employment rate was 3.5 percent for the whole population, but there was a large difference between whites and Latinos -- 3.3 percent versus 5.3 percent, respectively.

                        Knold says that illegal immigration increases because the economy demands it, and immigration tapers off in economic downtimes.

                        "We're not letting them come in legally in the volume that the economy is asking in the labor force, but there are side benefits. They are mobile and transitory, and they don't tend to stay in an area and weigh upon the social and economic costs in terms of unemployment and other benefits."

                        smcfarland@sltrib.com

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The propaganda just keeps on coming and coming! What joke.

                          Comment



                          Working...
                          X