Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Explain this to me please

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Explain this to me please

    1 False immaterial testimony cannot be used to establish deportability. See Ramero v INS, 39 F.3d 977 (9 th Cir. 1994). See also Plewa v. INS, 77 F. Supp. 2d 905 (N.D. Ill. 1999) (failure to disclose an immaterial arrest based on erroneous advice from an immigration counselor did not disqualify the applicant from establishing good moral character even though the applicant lied under oath to the INS examiner).

    Please explain this to me. If I am reading correctly then I cannot believe what I am reading.

  • #2
    1 False immaterial testimony cannot be used to establish deportability. See Ramero v INS, 39 F.3d 977 (9 th Cir. 1994). See also Plewa v. INS, 77 F. Supp. 2d 905 (N.D. Ill. 1999) (failure to disclose an immaterial arrest based on erroneous advice from an immigration counselor did not disqualify the applicant from establishing good moral character even though the applicant lied under oath to the INS examiner).

    Please explain this to me. If I am reading correctly then I cannot believe what I am reading.

    Comment


    • #3
      <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Robin Horton:
      1 False immaterial testimony cannot be used to establish deportability. See Ramero v INS, 39 F.3d 977 (9 th Cir. 1994). See also Plewa v. INS, 77 F. Supp. 2d 905 (N.D. Ill. 1999) (failure to disclose an immaterial arrest based on erroneous advice from an immigration counselor did not disqualify the applicant from establishing good moral character even though the applicant lied under oath to the INS examiner).

      Please explain this to me. If I am reading correctly then I cannot believe what I am reading. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

      It's because it's immaterial! If it would be a material fact it would be opposite!
      “...I may condemn what you say, but I will give my life for that you may say it”! - Voltaire

      Comment


      • #4
        <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Robin Horton:
        1 False immaterial testimony cannot be used to establish deportability. See Ramero v INS, 39 F.3d 977 (9 th Cir. 1994). See also Plewa v. INS, 77 F. Supp. 2d 905 (N.D. Ill. 1999) (failure to disclose an immaterial arrest based on erroneous advice from an immigration counselor did not disqualify the applicant from establishing good moral character even though the applicant lied under oath to the INS examiner).

        Please explain this to me. If I am reading correctly then I cannot believe what I am reading. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

        What is the question? Law is complicated and not all cases are text book.

        Comment


        • #5
          Lawyers rarely get the boot, spanked, etc even though they have slept during a murder trial.
          "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams on Defense of the boston Massacre

          Comment


          • #6
            there is a difference between not having your credentials in order and being sanctioned Davdah. Where i am at, the immigration court does not list that on the public notice board. you are given a list that is recommended by the immigration court for free legal advice, and that is all.
            "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams on Defense of the boston Massacre

            Comment


            • #7
              dirty commie judges change the law at their whim.

              Comment



              Working...
              X