Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Impeach Schwarzenegger !!!!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Impeach Schwarzenegger !!!!

    This idiot foreigner who destroyed one of our most beautiful and successful states and is considered to be the worst Governor in the US is criticizing, and basically raping, Sarah Palin who is the most successful Governor in the US. California was the most beautiful, economically successful and clean state before Schwarzenegger took over and now it is a complete mess economically and enviornmentally.
    Another idiot failed foreigner criticizing a successful American ! And the s e x ism is obvious and blatant.


    schwarzenegger the barbarian

  • #2
    This idiot foreigner who destroyed one of our most beautiful and successful states and is considered to be the worst Governor in the US is criticizing, and basically raping, Sarah Palin who is the most successful Governor in the US. California was the most beautiful, economically successful and clean state before Schwarzenegger took over and now it is a complete mess economically and enviornmentally.
    Another idiot failed foreigner criticizing a successful American ! And the s e x ism is obvious and blatant.


    schwarzenegger the barbarian

    Comment


    • #3
      <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">California was the most beautiful, economically successful and clean state before Schwarzenegger took over </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


      Are you saying you preferred the super liberal democrat Gray Davis, over the Governator?

      Comment


      • #4
        Naaaah, it's the Republican moderates vs the far right hard-liners Unique. SP will try to destroy the moderates white attempting to promote her view of what the "real" Republicans are.

        More of it I say because she and her hard-liners will be alienated from her own party and with luck, they'll leave and form their own hard right party which means SP will never get to see the inside of the White House
        "What you see in the photograph isn't what you saw at the time. The real skill of photography is organized visual lying."

        Comment


        • #5
          I would rather a liberal socialist Democrat than a so-called "Republican" RINO - Republican in name only. The latter does more damage; they give Republicans a bad name and maybe the Republicans are the only hope we have unless the Libertarian Party can rise up which I pray for.

          Comment


          • #6
            Democrats make no apology for being socialists, communists, NAMBLA, IMBRA, and Climate Warming fanatics. Obama is the most extremist person ever elected; more extreme even than Hitler or FDR. There is no room for moderates in the Democrat Party. They are focused; altough immorally. And that is why they win. Republicans have no backbone. That is why they got Bush in there. They have no principles. That is why they are lost. Kill off the moderates. Get rid of them. We don't need that kind. Get a message. Get a direction. LEAD and not follow. That is how you win.

            Comment


            • #7
              <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SonofMichael:
              I would rather a liberal socialist Democrat than a so-called "Republican" RINO - Republican in name only. The latter does more damage; they give Republicans a bad name and maybe the Republicans are the only hope we have unless the Libertarian Party can rise up which I pray for. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

              This is an excellent post , SOM!
              http://www.anbsoft.com/images/usflag_med.jpg

              "...I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibit

              Comment


              • #8
                Ok, I give it to you. Inh is my other login name. Tee-he-he! (Sorry, inh. And sorry too, Brit. I inherited this 'Tee-he-he' shrill from Explora, one of the past regulars here that I sorely miss).

                Comment


                • #9
                  Never have I used 'lmao' and the likes ever, and I don't intend to. Ok, the first login name that I used that's now defunct was....... was....... never mind. Please ask Sam. It's them who approved my request to switch to RN anyhow.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I did it whether it's necessary or not, to cover myself in any future eventualities. Again, important or not, it doesn't matter. But for me the important thing is that I did it. And I documented it. Did you? No way! See? That's what I'm saying about a chess grand master's daughter gone bad.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Nahhhh, thanks! I could be rough and wild sometimes. But never bad and filthy like you.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Haha! Oops! And we'll engage in some kind of 'privileged' conversation, your style! Nahhh, you go ahead with that white 'sire' of yours. That's interesting, isn't it? To be captioned: The B.itch and Sire on a rough and wild hike in the wilderness. Tee-he-he!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Oh yeah, I admit, I did it. I betrayed your secret attempts to extract information from me. And I'm proud of it. Because your offer of confidentiality was not reciprocated by me. It was a unilateral offer of secrecy that I rejected each time. Hence, no agreement ever existed. No covenant between two parties was ever sealed. Therefore, I'm not bound by any of it. I'll do it again and again, as much as necessary. Because I've seen how you used and abused the information given to you in confidence by other members. I congratulate myself because my hunches saved me from the outset. Go ahead, spill any info that you have about me.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Oh wow! It's not over until I say it's over. You're the one who dragged me into this. I can't turn you loose that easily. That's so convenient, to plead innocent on grounds of insanity. In criminal proceedings, it's referred to as 'defense of insanity' or otherwise translated as 'the assumption that an insane person cannot commit crime.' Just like here, you don't want to argue with me head-on (because you can't) so you hide behind your feigned assumption that I am not me that you're arguing with, but somebody else. Aha! You can fool some people a few times. But you can't fool me ever. You'll always be irritated on account of me. I promise.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Know what? That's yet another one of the silliest things that I've ever read being posted by you on here. That you'll never post on ilw.com again. It's something like you said that the sun would never rise tomorrow morning. I said it before and I'm saying it again now - it's easier to leave ilw.com than for ilw.com to leave you. And it's pretty much more so if one's login name is iperson. As long as her infatuation and obsession and desperation towards someone here remained. Which, in all likelihood, would last for a long-long time. Because her enslavement would take her to limitless bounds and would stop at nothing to satisfy it. Really, really poor cretin. What's that again? Grandmaster's daughter for sale to the most stupid bidder, anyone?

                              Comment



                              Working...
                              X