SAMMY AND EVERYONE, PLEASE I NEED AN URGENT ADVICE.
MY PETITION FOR REVIEW TO THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS WAS DENIED. THE COURT STATED THAT IT LACKED SUFFICIENT MEANINGFUL STANDARD AGAINST WHICH TO JUDGE THE BIA'S DECISION NOT TO REOPEN. IT ALSO STATED THAT BECAUSE I DID NOT APPEAL THE IMMIGRTATION JUDGE'S ORDER TO THE BIA, THE BIA NEVER RENDERED A DECISION ON THAT ORDER. CONSEQUENTLY, THE BIA LACKED AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER PETITIONER'S SUBSTANTIVE REQUEST TO REOPEN.
AFTER THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE MADE HIS DENIED MY APPLICATION FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS AND GRANTED ME A VOLUNTARY DEPARTURE, I APPEALED TO THE JUDGE TO REOPEN MY CASE BASED ON INNEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. THIS APPEAL WAS DENIED.
MY NEW COUNSEL THEN DID A MOTION TO REOPEN TO THE BIA BASED ON INNEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF CONSEL. THIS MOTION WAS ALSO DENIED.
HE THEN APPEALED THIS TO THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL. THE CIRCUIT COURT DENIED THIS PETITON FOR REVIEW BECAUSE I SHOULD HAVE APPEALED THE JUDGE'S DECISION TO THE BIA, NOT DO A MOTION TO REOPEN.
MY QUESTION NOW IS, CAN I STILL APPEAL THE IMMIGRATION JUDGES'S DECISION TO THE BIA? CAN THIS BE EQUITABLY TOLLED?
CAN I GO TO THE DISTRICT COURT TO ARGUE THAT MY DUE PROCESS RIGHT HAVE BEEN VIOLATED DUE TO INNEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?
MY LAWYER THINKS WE SHOULD GO TO THE SUPREME COURT. I HAVE SOME DOUBT ABOUT THAT.
PLEASE SOMEONE HELP, THIS IS MY LAST CHANCE.
THANKS
BIBI
