What a surprise! An immigration attorney committing fraud..

No wonder the consular officials are skeptical of anything an immigration attorney says or writes....

Hartford Immigration Attorney Pleads Guilty To Document Fraud
By JEFFREY B. COHEN | Courant Staff Writer
May 10, 2008
Article tools
E-mail Share
Digg Del.icio.us Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo Print Reprints Post comment Text size: Jose del Castillo, a city immigration attorney and former chairman of the Hartford Redevelopment Agency, admitted in federal court Friday that he falsified federal documents to assist illegal immigrants along the path to legal residency. Del Castillo, 48, pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court to one count of federal document fraud, a felony that could net him up to 10 years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

Del Castillo was indicted in late 2006 on nearly two dozen counts of document fraud for filing immigration forms with state and federal officials saying his clients had legitimate job offers as cooks and hosts at Mamacita's at the Forge Restaurant, a Broad Street restaurant he owned earlier in the decade.

The forms, which del Castillo accepted payment for and filed in 2001 and 2002, contained assertions that del Castillo knew were not true, such as that the applicants were qualified to do the work and that hiring them would not affect legal workers, according to federal prosecutors.

In a nearly hourlong hearing before Chief U.S. District Judge Robert N. Chatigny, a week before his case was scheduled for trial, del Castillo pleaded guilty toknowingly falsifying and filing paperwork for a woman living in Poland to begin the citizenship process. The action was taken without her knowledge or consent.

Specifically, del Castillo said the woman had training as a waitress to work in his restaurant when she did not.

Typically, del Castillo charged a fee for this service. In this case, he had not collected a fee, his attorney said.

So Chatigny asked him why he did it.

"To help," del Castillo said, eliciting a response from Assistant U.S. Attorney Douglas Morabito that the government did not decide to prosecute del Castillo "because he was acting out of the goodness of his heart."

In a statement released after the hearing, Acting U.S. Attorney Nora Dannehy said that del Castillo had committed an "egregious offense" and that "immigration attorneys who abuse their position of trust, and employers who lie on important immigration applications, will be vigorously prosecuted."

Although he only pleaded guilty to one count involving one client, del Castillo admitted to having done so at least three other times with three other clients in his signed plea agreement with the government. He faces a maximum of 10 years' imprisonment and a $250,000 fine. Federal sentencing guidelines contemplate between 12 and 18 months in prison and anywhere between a $3,000 and a $30,000 fine, Chatigny said. Del Castillo is scheduled to be sentenced July 28.

After his sentencing, del Castillo could face disbarment. Del Castillo has already been twice reprimanded by the Statewide Grievance Committee of the Statewide Bar Counsel.

The case against del Castillo goes back to early 2001, when windows in federal law had given illegal immigrants with an employer or family sponsor the chance to pay a $1,000 penalty, seek a green card while on U.S. soil, and possibly achieve citizenship.

The process began with the filing of paperwork with the state Department of Labor.

In March 2001, del Castillo opened Mamacita's, his agreement says. On April 30, 2001, he filed roughly 100 applications for clients, records from the labor department show. He filed more applications later in 2002.

Of those 2001 applications, 14 were for people to work at his Frog Hollow restaurant — nine cooks, five hostesses. They were supposedly to do the full-time work that he said U.S. citizens wouldn't do. Records show the applicants came from Colombia, Germany, Brazil, Peru, Venezuela, Ecuador, Mexico and Poland.

In their indictments, federal prosecutors alleged that several of the applications del Castillo filed for people to work at Mamacita's were fraudulent. So were applications he filed for clients to work in at least one other area restaurant.

Del Castillo's admissions drew a sharp rebuke from one prominent immigration attorney.

"You can't say, 'I'm only trying to help somebody,' when you flat-out lie to the United States government," said attorney Joseph Tapper, former chairman of the Connecticut chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. "That is an unethical, illegal thing for a lawyer to do and there are reasons for our rules."

"Millions of other people would have loved to get into this country," Tapper said. "But dozens and dozens and dozens of ethical practitioners refused to file cases for people who didn't have a legitimate claim."

Hope Seeley, del Castillo's attorney, declined comment.

(my comment: note that Mr Tapper, another 'practioner' who belongs to AILA says that 'dozens and dozens and dozens of ethical practioners [wonder what he considers 'ethical'] refused to file cases.."..but there about 8100 AILA members, which means after you subtract 3 or 4 dozen alleged ethical attorneys, how many unethical ones are left? [hint: a lot])

Posts: 3396 | Registered: 09-10-2003

4now

Power Member
Picture of 4now

Posted