APPROVED LETTER, unlawful presence
This hardship letter is from Panamr - Her husband is from Romania. The waiver was adjudicated in Austria.
March 15, 2004
United States Embassy
Filipescu 26
Bucharest, Romania
RE: LETTER BRIEF/ APPLICATIONS FOR WAIVERS
ALIEN NAME A# *********
To Whom It May Concern:
I am submitting this letter brief in support of ALIENS extreme hardship waiver so that he may join in US CITIZEN and enter the United States on a K-3 visa. ALIEN previously appeared at your consul for an interview on his K-3 petition but was advised he needed to submit I-192 and I-601 waivers seeking discretionary relief under INS 2129(a)(9)(B)(v) and/or INA 212 (d)(3).
ALIEN had entered the U.S. as an alien crewman (D-1) and his authorization stay expired on August 28, 2001. Unfortunately, he and his US CITIZEN were encouraged to file an adjustment application (I-485) with the INS by another immigration attorney. The couple was never advised that he would be ineligible for adjustment because he entered as a crewman. The petition and application were filed on July 10, 2002 and the matter was not granfathered under section 245(i). The application (I-485) was denied, and he was placed in removal proceedings on July 25, 2002.
We were thereafter retained and ALIEN immediately filed an emergent request for voluntary departure, and he was granted such relief by the Immigration court. ALIEN departed the United States on November 20, 2002 under voluntary departure.
ALIEN now seeks a waiver of inadmissibility premised on extreme hardship to his US CITIZEN. We are submitting herewith applications I-192 and I-601 and hopefully you will agree that he is deserving of both the nonimmigrant and immigrant waivers premised on the argument set forth below.
I. HARDSHIP TO THE U.S. CITIZEN (U.S. CITEZENS NAME)
MEDICAL
US CITIZEN has significant health issues that require repetitive consultation and review. These health issues are life threatening if the conditions are not appropriately monitored and adequate care is not received. Significant stress will contribute to the likelihood of reoccurrence and considerable pain associated with these maladies.
A. MEDICAL CONDITIONS
US CITIZEN was diagnosed with a moderate state of Cervical Dysplasia in July 2003. Cervical Dysplasia is considered to be a pre-cancerous condition. If left untreated, or poorly treated, there is a 30-50% chance that the cervical dysplasia will progress to invasive cervical cancer, which has a 30% mortality rate. Moderate dysplasia has a higher rate of progression to cancer. In the case of US CITIZEN, several factors further increase this risk. First, US CITIZEN is a Native American woman. Second, her current economic situation (due to the distance between herself and her husband) is strained, and further strain, or the necessity to leave the United States to be with her husband, could affect her ability to receive regular screening. (See Exhibit A,
http://www.womenshealthchannel.com). According to the Women’s Health Channel website:
“Invasive cervical cancer is more common in women ¼ of poor socioeconomic status, who are less likely to receive regular screenings…There is also a higher rate of incidence among ¼ Native American women.â€
In October 2003, US CITIZEN received a LEEP procedure. The LEEP procedure surgically removes the pre-cancerous cells from the cervix. It is generally used when the pre-cancerous cells have reached a more advanced depth, and other methods, such as freezing, are unlikely to remove all of the cells. (See Exhibit B) Thus the use of this treatment suggests a higher risk for the future development of cervical cancer. After the procedure, the physician assigns the best course of follow-up measures for the patient. DOCTOR NAME, the operating physician states:
“US CITIZEN needs to have pap smears every three months for one year and every six months for two years in order to assure us of her not developing a recurrence of her dysplasia in the future.“ (See Exhibit C)
It is imperative that these follow-up appointments are utilized to be sure that the pre-cancerous tissue was completely removed and that the abnormal cells do not return.
The Romanian healthcare system does not have adequate facilities to provide proper detection of Cervical Dysplasia, nor prevention of its progression into Cervical Cancer. Accordingly, DOCTOR NAME, US CITIZEN’s family physician, states:
“I believe that US CITIZEN’s healthcare needs would be better addressed in the United States. I am comfortable with the idea that in the United States, we follow Standard of Care and Treatment Guideline in caring for a patient. This means that if US CITIZEN were to move to other states or cities, there are certain protocols in place for health professional’s to address her health conditions and concerns. I am not so sure that she would be able to attain this high level of care that she has grown up with in Romania. In addition, I believe that uprooting her from the United States and placing her in Romania would exacerbate her health conditions secondary to having to undergo cultural transitions.“ (See Exhibit D)
If US CITIZEN develops cervical cancer while in the USA, physicians at the hospital US CITIZEN works for may treat it. The hospital has a cancer center that is very knowledgeable in this area, and has dealt with numerous patients that have been diagnosed with cervical cancer. In Romania, the medical system is not as technologically advanced or well equipped to deal with cancers of this nature, even if it would be diagnosed in time for treatment. If the recommended preventative measures are not followed US CITIZEN could develop cervical cancer, and, without proper treatment, she could die.
According to the Project Concern International Romania report:
“Findings suggest that patient access to the nearest specialist-facility is a principle barrier to cervical cancer screening among women of reproductive age. In addition, a barrier to quality provision of this service is the poor relationship between the general practitioner and the OBGYN, which is commonly marked by a lack of professional courtesy, collaboration and teamwork.†(See Exhibit E)
US CITIZEN has also been diagnosed with Bursitis of the knee, which means that the bursa located in front of the kneecap becomes inflamed, fills with fluid and causes swelling at the top of the knee. Problems caused are pain with activity, rapid swelling on the front of the kneecap and tenderness to the touch. If chronic swelling occurs, it may cause disability. Under these circumstances, the physician may decide to aspirate the bursa with a needle or an orthopaedic surgeon may recommend surgical removal of the bursa. (See Exhibit F) DOCTOR NAME states:
“I believe that all of these conditions have been made worse from the emotional stressor of being separated from her husband.†(See the Holmes-Rahe Social Readjustment Rating Scale in Section II, or Exhibit G).
It has been extensively researched that the hospitals in Romania are at an all time low with providing adequate healthcare for patients. According to Project Concern International Romania:
“Economic hardship has led to widespread malnutrition and has hampered government efforts to provide adequate health services. These factors contribute to the current health care crisis in Romania. Patients have to bring their own food, soap, and toilet paper. The doctors require additional money (under the table funds) to give adequate follow up care to a patient†(www.pciromania.org, See Exhibit E).
This suggests that neither the Bursitis nor the Cervical Dysplasia would be appropriately treated. The care recommended for US CITIZEN requires recurring examinations. It is unlikely that the Romanian healthcare system would be able to provide the level of care and preventative measures that US CITIZEN would require. This lack of care could result in serious problems for US CITIZEN, or even death.
B. INSURANCE
US CITIZEN works at a healthcare facility. Therefore, she receives excellent healthcare insurance coverage as well as access to the facilities with employee discount benefits. Additionally, US CITIZEN is a member of the Sac and Fox Native American tribe. The tribe, which not only provides financial assistance to the tribe members when needing healthcare coverage, they also provide facilities dedicated specifically to Native Americans. If US CITIZEN is forced to leave the United States and move to Romania she will lose her Indian Healthcare benefits because the tribe rules articulate that if a member leaves the United States, they will lose their healthcare benefits and ability to use the Native American healthcare facilities. (See Exhibit H) US CITIZEN will also be forced to quit her job and in doing so she will have to forfeit her healthcare insurance, which is the means she uses to cover her current and future healthcare coverage. Therefore, without the healthcare coverage offered by her job or her Native American tribal affiliations, US CITZEN will not have access to, or the ability to pay for the necessary healthcare.
Given the current economic state of Romania, in which the average income is $75-$100 month, it is highly unlikely that US CITIZEN will be able to afford quality care. $75-$100 is not enough to cover basic healthcare expenses, let alone the additional money (“under the table bribesâ€) necessary to obtain proper treatment. Since US CITIZEN does not speak Romanian she would not be able to get a job that offers healthcare coverage to the employees.
Albeit of lesser concern, an additional medical stressor must be addressed. US CITIZEN had a bilateral LASIK Laser Vision Correction procedure done. This corrected her vision to 20/25. Part of the operation benefits was the TLC Lifetime Commitment, which entitled US CITIZEN to lifetime, cost free, vision corrections should her vision regress. One of the requirements to continuing as a Lifetime Commitment member is to have an annual eye exam. TLC does not currently have centers or an Affiliate Optometrist in Romania. Therefore, moving to Romania will affect her ability to keep her annual exams required by TLC and may void her protection under the TLC Lifetime Commitment plan. (See Exhibit I)
Psychological
Once ALIEN voluntarily departed from the United States, US CITIZEN was diagnosed by her family physician, DOCTOR NAME, with Major Depressive Disorder. DOCTOR NAME placed US CITIZEN on the antidepressant Zoloft, and referred her to undergo counseling.
Due to DOCTOR NAME recommendation, US CITIZEN’s supervisor suggested US CITIZEN speak with a employee assistance professional in EMPLOYERS Corporate Assistance Program. This is a confidential service provided to employees when they are going through depression, financial hardship or some other traumatic event in their life. According to US CITIZEN’s supervisor, SUPERVISORS NAME:
“I’ve noticed that she has been depressed and because of this depression she has lost quite a bit of weight. In addition to her weight loss, US CITIZEN has become increasingly moody, quiet and has tried to keep her sadness hidden inside herself. It would be too hard for her to talk about her hardship with others and maintain a professional demeanor.†(See Exhibit J)
Based on SUPERVISORS NAME’s suggestion, US CITIZN saw COUNSELOR NAME, a counselor through this program, on several occasions. He recommended US CITIZEN to seek further counseling from a therapist. (See Exhibit K) COUNSELORS NAME states:
“The concerns addressed were the stress that US CITIZEN experienced at work and in life due to the absence of her husband.â€
US CITIZEN then sought counseling from PSYCHOLOGISTS NAME, a certified psychologist. PSYCHOLOGISTS NAME states in her report:
“US CITIZEN’s case is exacerbated by psychological factors. Test data does confirm that US CITIZEN is highly anxious and depressed and feeling very negative about herself. She is somewhat dependent. However, she is the only wage earner and sends ALIEN money when able to do so. She is extremely close to her family and members of her extended family. US CITIZEN appears to have been closest with her cousins. Given her close family ties, her health history, and the necessity of providing and income, US CITIZEN continues to spiral downward into depression. Unable to work in Romania nor complete and education, the prospect of a ten year separation is daunting.
The majority of drawing cues indicate that US CITIZEN is feeling inadequate and insecure. She is somewhat timid, dependent, and feels helpless and weak and tends to prefer to keep her feelings secret; for she does not trust easily. Her energy appears to be somewhat low at this time, perhaps because she is most likely to use her energy to over compensate for self-perceived weaknesses. She is also intensely feels the pressures and inhibitions of her environment. She clearly fears the future.†(See Exhibit L)
Due to the extreme hardship US CITIZEN has experienced as a result of the separation from her husband, and will experience if forced to move from her family and country, US CITIZEN has suffered psychologically. She misses the emotional support her husband provides in regards to celebrating personal achievements, such as a recent promotion at work, and celebrating national holidays with each other and with their family. Each holiday, birthday, and anniversary they do not spend together sends US CITIZEN into a state of depression.
Pregnancy
US CITIZEN and her husband, ALIEN, want to start a family in the immediate future. However, they fear that, due to the present practices and conditions in Romanian hospitals, there are serious risks to both US CITIZENS’s own health and to that of any child born to US CITIZEN in Romania. According to Project Concern International Romania:
“Maternity and Infant Mortality Rates [in Romania] are amongst the highest in Europe.†(See Exhibit E)
On the other hand, if forced to wait to start their family until the 10-year bar is finished, US CITIZEN will be 35-40 years old.
www.parenting.com states the following:
“Fertility continues to decline after age 35. The decline is due mostly to the fact that the woman’s eggs are aging and they become more difficult to fertilize. The risk of high blood pressure during pregnancy is about double to woman over 35 compared with younger ones. In addition, the risks of having a baby with Down syndrome or another type of chromosomal disorder being to rise significantly†(See Exhibit M).
Therefore, if US CITIZEN waits until she is 35-40 years of age to become pregnant, both she and her child will be exposed to numerous high risk factors.
Also, Romania has a severe AIDS epidemic for young children. Highlights on Health in Romania report:
“The main reason for these infections with HIV is injections with contaminated blood and needles. Romania has 99% of the children 0-12 years old with AIDS in the western and northern European countries.â€
This would add yet another concern to the list of medical concerns that would be experienced by both US CITIZEN and her husband, should they choose to have a child in Romania. (See Exhibit N)
EDUCATIONAL
US CITIZEN is currently studying for her Bachelor’s degree in Accounting at the University of Central Oklahoma. She is a student in very good standing and is expected to successfully complete all requirements for her Bachelor’s degree and subsequently take the Certified Public Accounts (CPA) exam. With this degree, and the CPA certification, she could be expected to earn annually $30,320 to $82,730, depending upon the context of her employment. However, in order to test for the CPA exam US CITIZEN would have to live in the United States. The CPA requires every applicant to have graduated from an accredited four-year college or university with a major in accounting, and to have at least 150 semester hours from an accredited four-year college. Currently, US CITIZEN has accrued 110 semester hours towards this degree. (See Exhibit O)
If forced to leave the country, US CITIZEN will have to forfeit the possibility of finishing her education because Romania does not teach, at a college level, in English and US CITIZEN does not know the Romanian language. Additionally, due to CPA requirements, she would no longer be eligible to take the CPA exam. According to Despina Barbieru, the International Programs representative at the Romanian-American University:
“In order to enroll in our university, you must speak the Romanian language as teaching here is in Romanian.†(See Exhibit P)
US CITIZEN receives educational payment assistance from both her employer and from her Native American tribe. If forced to leave the country, she would be forced to forfeit both the reimbursement from her employer because she would be forced to quit; and the Native American tribe has regulations that state a tribal member would not be eligible for Education department services if they move outside of the country. This would pose extreme hardship to US CITIZEN because she has dedicated 5 years of her life to attain this degree and would be forced to halt her efforts due to lack of educational facilities, language barriers and financial issues in Romania.
Even if US CITIZEN were to finish her education here in the United States, and to become certified as a public accountant, she would not be able to attain similar financial independence in Romania. The average salary in Romania is $75-$100 dollars per month. However, it is unlikely that US CITIZEN would be able to obtain a job, in Romania, in her field at all as she does not speak Romanian, and all of her training, both past and future has been done in the United States, in accordance with U.S. laws. Thus, if required to move to Romania for the sake of her marriage, US CITIZEN would not be able to complete her studies, would not be able to find a job in her chosen field, and would not be able to earn a salary comparable to that of a U.S. salary.
Economic
US CITIZEN would suffer economic hardship because she would have to quit her job in the United States to move to Romania. In the United States, US CITIZEN currently makes the minimum adequate income to support herself, however this is only with the aid of her parents. US CITIZENS PARENTS have considerately allowed US CITIZEN to stay in their residence while US CITIZEN tries to take care of the financial responsibilities she carries. She currently maintains payments on financial loans, student loans, attorney fees, phone bills ranging from $80-$100 dollars a month to speak with her husband, and sends her husband funds to help him financially while in Romania. (See Exhibit Q)
If ALIEN were permitted to return to the United States he could help her resolve the current financial despair she is in. ALIENS’s educational history leans towards electritional work , which earns approximately $40,000 to $65,000 in the USA. Additionally, he is a dedicated and hard worker and many people would be happy to employ him. Currently, ALIEN is at a disadvantage for finding work while he lives with his family in Romania because they live in a small town whose only business comes from summer vacationers. Work is difficult to find for ALIEN and he is not able to provide financial support to either US CITIZEN or his Romanian family, thereby increasing the burden on US CITIZEN. Given the information above that US CITIZEN would not be able to help provide income and the average monthly income is $75 to $100 month, if US CITIZEN is forced to live in Romania they would not be able to afford a home of their own in another city. Therefore they would be forced to live with ALIEN’s family in their one bedroom apartment.
If US CITIZEN quits her job to move to Romania and be with her husband, it is unlikely that she will be able to find a job (due to lack of training, language barriers, and the overall economic situation in Romania.) This would make her situation even graver and would impact numerous portions of her life: psychological, physical (see medical section), and even future family life. Not only would this provoke serious depression due to loss of ability to provide income, but financial difficulties would also affect the possibility of her and her husband starting a family. This would be an extreme hardship to US CITIZEN because she desperately wants to start her own family with her husband.
Additionally, due to these financial and economic issues both US CITIZEN and ALIEN would be forced to live with ALIEN’s family, who reside in a one-bedroom apartment. Currently, including ALIEN, there are four people living in this apartment. During the wintertime, the residents are allowed hot water twice during the week. This would be a very severe change in living standards for US CITIZEN, and would further increase her levels of hardship.
Family Ties
US CITIZEN is exceptionally close and emotionally dependent on her United States family. She is an only child to her mother and father. They have lived in close proximity of one another through out a majority of her life. US CITIZEN attempted to live in another state at one point, but moved back within six months due to the emotional depression she experienced from being separated from her parents and family. PSYCHOLOGIST states:
“As a child, US CITIZEN was subjected to long separations from her military father. Her mother does not cope well with the separations. US CITIZEN has always lived with her mother during those separations. She attempted to become more independent and moved to California with a cousin. Six months later she returned home because neither she nor her mother could handle the separation. (See Exhibit L)
US CITIZENS MOTHER states:
“I know the United States and international law recognizes the unique relationship between parent and child and that family unification has long been a cornerstone of these laws. I maintain a very close relationship with my only child, US CITIZEN, and my love for her is unconditional. At times, when I’m alone, I cry because of the possibility of losing the closeness we share if she is forced to move to Romania. Please, I plead with you, to understand, respect and uphold the bond between parent and child.†(See Exhibit R)
US CITIZENS FATHER states:
“Since the separation, due to voluntary departure, I’ve noticed US CITIZEN is…consistently depressed and stressed…attention span is haphazard…and has developed numerous physical ailments. Please, I implore you to assist us in reuniting these two young individuals and allowing them to resume their lives and future in the United States.†(See Exhibit S)
Her entire family lives within the United States and in Oklahoma City. They frequently see each other for family events (such as birthdays), holidays and daily gatherings. If forced to move to Romania she would have limited if any contact with her family. This is not only in regards to distance and financial issues, but also to the current threat of terrorist attacks upon international flights. The extreme hardship on both US CITIZEN, her parents and immediate family would be extreme given they could rarely see one another, and when they did, they would have to worry about their safety and well being.
US CITIZENS COUSIN recently had a baby. US CITIZEN has helped US CITIZENS COUSIN, a single mother, with many challenges she has faced (babysitting, moving, and emotional support) and in the process has grown attached to both COUSINS BABY and US CITIZENS COUSIN. It would be an extreme hardship on US CITIZEN AND HER COUSIN to separate them from one another.
Heritage
US CITIZEN is a Native American and a member of the Sac and Fox tribe. Being a Native American is a cultural heritage that is extensively celebrated in the United States. US CITIZEN and her family frequently attend Native American Pow Wows, adoptions, name-giving ceremonies, and feasts in celebration of the Native American heritage. In addition, US CITIZEN attends a yearly “ghost feastâ€, which is an honorable celebration in remembrance of her great-grandfather. The family comes together on his land, eats his favorite foods, and share in his memory. Each family member is assigned a particular task by her great-grandmother. If forced to move to Romania, she would be deprived of this part of her cultural heritage.
This would create an extreme hardship on not only US CITIZEN, because she is in close contact with her heritage and Native American family, but also her future children who will not be entitled to rightfully experience their Native American heritage.
In addition, if forced to leave her home country and live in Romania, the possibility of meeting friends or contacts, in Romania, that share her Native American heritage are unlikely. This would create additional hardship.
II. THE HOLMES-RAHE SOCIAL READJUSTMENT RATING
SCALE
In 1967 Thomas H. Holmes, M.D. and Richard H. Rahe, M.D. published in the prestigious Journal of Psychosomatic Research, "The Social Readjustment Rating Scale". This scale is now famous. Its efficacy is well established. For instance, in December 2000 in Educational and Psychological Measurement Judith A. Scully, Henry Tosi and Kevin Banning re-evaluated the use of this instrument. The abstract of their article states:
"The authors conclude that, in sum, life change events remain useful predictors of stress related-symptom scores and that the SRRS is a robust instrument for identifying the potential for the occurrence of stress-related outcomes and is, therefore, a useful tool..."
The scale uses the weighting of Life Changes Units (LCU's) as a means of being able to predict vulnerability to medical illness. For instance, a marital separation would accrue 65 LCU's and an outstanding personal achievement would accrue 28 LCU's. In other words, significant life changes, positive and negative, which occur with frequency and intensity, are significant variables in the development of medical illness. It is not possible to predict exactly which illness might occur. However, degree of vulnerability can be predicted. (Pre-existing conditions are presumed to be highly vulnerable to exacerbation).
The following are the predictive ranges of the Holmes-Rahe Social Readjustment Rating Scale:
LCU<150: 35% Chance of illness or injury in two year period
LCU 150-130: 51% Chance of illness or injury in two year period
LCU>300: 80% Chance of illness or injury in two year period
This Scale was applied to US CITIZEN (on the assumed basis that she was forced to move to Romania). US CITIZENS score on this instrument was " 455 ". On the other hand, if ALIEN were admitted to the USA her score would drop dramatically to 125.
If she is forced to move to Romania, she is clearly within the highest-risk range of developing medical illness or injury in the two years following her move.
The Holmes-Rahe SRRS also demonstrates a very important fact widely recognized in the health sciences. Stress and other risk factors not only exist as independent influences, they interact dynamically. In other words, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. US CITIZEN is being subjected to, or may be subjected to, factors whose interactions contribute exponentially to her experience of hardship. The factors herein delineated are more than additive. Each interacts with the other in a dynamic manner that potentates and heightens their mutual impact upon US CITIZEN. Therefore, the totality of hardship factors exceeds measurement. (See Exhibit G)
III. Family Unity
In addition, US CITIZEN would experience and extreme hardship due to the fact that if forced to live in Romania she would almost never be united with her entire family. Meaning that she would not be with her husband and her family at the same time. The ability for her husband to interact with her family in family settings is imperative to all involved and would be unattainable if forced to live in Romania. This would not only be an extreme hardship on US CITIZEN but on her family and husband since they would lose the ability to grow together as a unit.
FAMILY FRIEND says this of US CITIZEN and ALIEN:
“My husband, my son, and I went to Oklahoma after they had been married a few months. What we saw was a family; probably closer and more cohesive than quite a few American families. US CITIZEN AND ALIEN were sweet together. ALIEN ‘fit in’ with US CITIZENS parents. He was personable and great company, especially to our then 15-year-old son. Since ALIENS deportation, I’ve seen how hard it’s been for US CITIZEN and her parents. They are a close-knit unit.†(See Exhibit T)
US CITIZEN is incredibly close to her family and close relatives and friends. Her life is in Oklahoma City. However, she is incomplete without her husband. They balance each other’s strengths and weaknesses. When she is irate, he understands. When he is frustrated, she is patient. She needs him to share in the joys of life, in the extreme hardships that she currently has to endure. US CITIZEN is dependent on ALIEN, for his love, integrity, his emotional support and financial support. ALIENS presence is imperative to US CITIZENS person.
ALIEN is a good man. Both US CITIZEN and ALIEN are aware that breaking the law was a mistake, but it is not characteristic of ALIEN and will never happen again. ALIEN is terribly sorry for all of the harm he has done to the United States. He is a hard worker with a strong sense of integrity. He wants the opportunity to raise and support a family with his wife US CITIZEN in the United States.
US CITIZENS MOTHER says this about ALIEN:
“ALIEN is my son-in-law, but in my heart, he is my son. I could not of asked for a more loving and caring son. When my husband was away for 3 months, ALIEN was there to mow the yard for me and help me when I had car problems. He was there for us when my father had prostate surgery. ALIEN has a caring heart and I am proud he is my son.†(See Exhibit R)
IV. CONCLUSION
Because this is a full and complete marriage with intense emotional, social, familial, economic, and spiritual ties, US CITIZEN reciprocal bond with ALIEN must be granted great weight while accessing what would happen to US CITIZEN if ALIEN were not admitted to the United States. All extra hardships are built upon the base of significant, although usual hardship. In other words, it is of note that US CITIZEN misses her husband painfully, is uncertain and frightened about her future because it depends upon the status of her husband, etc. However, these are considered herein to be “simply†the backdrop from those other, previously listed hardship that, individually and when combined and interacting are severe. In other words, the enormous strain of being separated from her husband constitutes a powerful hardship to US CITIZEN. Te other hardship on top of this one culminate in her being potentially and actually subjected to extreme and unusual hardship. We respectfully request the waivers be approved.
Attorney’s signature Attorney name, address, telephone number
Last edited by spouse on Sun