quote:

Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:
Oh yes, I understand that. How many court orders are currently in force, MIR? And what are they? Restraining order, Temporary protective order, Emergency protective order, etc.? Of course, all in favor of your ex-battered spouse. No connection, yeah, yeah, tough, eh?

Actually the "Supposed" Battered Spouse Lied to the Us Consulate, Married The Real To Petition Later, The Family Was Your favorite Buddies Back Home! In Law Enforcement! Daddy Was assassinated By Folk of the land. Cannot go home To Mobs of Friends!!! Wore out their welcome as scammers there also!!! Sociopaths Can Win For Awhile. Eventually It all catches up In the End!!!

But the First Amendment rights don't apply in any private site, properties, or premises. Exercise that improperly in my own yard and the first amendment you'll get from me is the normal alignment of your jaws with a baseball bat.

quote:

Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:
But honestly, nothing malicious.

But explain that RN. Why did you use those words: nothing malicious (just for fun). What did you mean by that?

quote:

Originally posted by frenchybee:

quote:

Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:
But honestly, nothing malicious.

But explain that RN. Why did you use those words: nothing malicious (just for fun). What did you mean by that?

Why do you need to have two ids on the same site? It's like you're hiding something. People have taking this whole cyberspace thing too far.

quote:

Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:
Fbee, nothing malicious and just for fun mean plainly what the words mean. I didn't intend to hide behind an ID to put anybody down or feed my anti-immigrant fetish, nor would I abuse any welcome that's freely accorded to me, proof being I left the site after trying and succeeding to have a duplicate ID. I did my part. Now please explain to me why you asked.

i asked because it would never enter my or anyone else's mind to hold a malicious intent of having a multiple id

it entered Yours.. hmm

you can bash immigrants, put people down, etc. etc. under one id quite well, so what could a multiple id be used for maliciously, can you explain?

Fbee/PUSC, nothing malicious and just for fun mean plainly what the words mean. I didn't intend to hide behind an ID to put anybody down or feed my anti-immigrant fetish, nor would I abuse any welcome that's freely accorded to me, proof being I left the site after trying and succeeding to have a duplicate ID. I did my part. Now please explain to me why you asked.

Oh well, Fbee, just a friendly advice to you then. Try to find out the exact meaning of the words 'malice' and 'fun.'

quote:

Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:
Fbee/PUSC, nothing malicious and just for fun mean plainly what the words mean. I didn't intend to hide behind an ID to put anybody down or feed my anti-immigrant fetish, nor would I abuse any welcome that's freely accorded to me, proof being I left the site after trying and succeeding to have a duplicate ID. I did my part. Now please explain to me why you asked.

Oh well, Fbee, just a friendly advice to you then. Try to find out the exact meaning of the words 'malice' and 'fun.'

you are usually smarter RN, than give such answers
so tell me, what is the advantage of having multiple ids to having one id?
and while trying to answer that, also explain why did you even try to register two ids at im2us at all?

This message has been edited. Last edited by: frenchybee,

quote:

Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:
But the First Amendment rights don't apply in any private site, properties, or premises. Exercise that improperly in my own yard and the first amendment you'll get from me is the normal alignment of your jaws with a baseball bat.

WHAT?????

I reserve the right to refuse to answer that because that question to me is off-tangent and beside the point. I did that sans malice (just for fun) just to prove to find out if that site is fool-proof to multiple IDs. I found out it's not, but I stopped there after trying and succeeding. You said one would be banned because of that. I said nope. Then you ask me now what's the advantage.. To me, that's an irrelevant question.

quote:

Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:
I reserve the right to refuse to answer that because that question to me is off-tangent and beside the point. I did that sans malice (just for fun) just to prove to find out if that site is fool-proof to multiple IDs. I found out it's not, but I stopped there after trying and succeeding. You said one would be banned because of that. I said nope. Then you ask me now what's the advantage.. To me, that's an irrelevant question.

it is relevant to me, and your evasive answers are telling

thanks for sharing

quote:

Originally posted by davdah:

quote:

Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:
But the First Amendment rights don't apply in any private site, properties, or premises. Exercise that improperly in my own yard and the first amendment you'll get from me is the normal alignment of your jaws with a baseball bat.

WHAT?????

I mean what I said and I said what I mean. Yes, that's WHAT it is! Prove me wrong.

quote:

Originally posted by frenchybee:

quote:

Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:
I reserve the right to refuse to answer that because that question to me is off-tangent and beside the point. I did that sans malice (just for fun) just to prove to find out if that site is fool-proof to multiple IDs. I found out it's not, but I stopped there after trying and succeeding. You said one would be banned because of that. I said nope. Then you ask me now what's the advantage.. To me, that's an irrelevant question.

it is relevant to me, and your evasive answers are telling

thanks for sharing

And the relevance is... Now my answers are evasive, why? Is it because I proved that your statement was wrong about banning?

No, Freebee, but I don't make any sweeping statement about any site until I'm absolutely sure about it. Unlike others..

don't turn the cat around RN, i didn't make any sweeping statements- the admin at i2us posted a message that when discovered someone is using double ids, they will be removed
so my statement was not wrong

now going back to your telling post, you seem to be checking sites if they foolproof or not while nobody else does that
you mentioned the word: malicious intent, and made sure to let us know this was not so, and you left the site - why try to assure me of that?
i would not wonder if your intentions were malicious- it would simply not enter my mind, and i would not wonder if you stayed at i2us using double id or not..

quote:

Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:

quote:

Originally posted by davdah:

quote:

Originally posted by Rough Neighbor:
But the First Amendment rights don't apply in any private site, properties, or premises. Exercise that improperly in my own yard and the first amendment you'll get from me is the normal alignment of your jaws with a baseball bat.

WHAT?????

I mean what I said and I said what I mean. Yes, that's WHAT it is! Prove me wrong.

Your agitation is misplaced. I'm not even sure where you're going with this. The only point I was making is it's up to the owner, within legal bounds, which excludes baseball bats (LOL) , to decide what is permissible and what isn't. If you set up a site and only allow people from your home country to participate that would be your right to do so. Just the same as the owners of ILW have allowed the breath and scope of conversations to include threats of hitting people with baseball bats. Try saying that on immigrate to us and see how fast your post vanishes, regardless which ID is used, LOL.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: davdah,

now you can't get angry at me RN and you know that
so what's your strategy?

my guess is: withdraw! withdraw! withdraw!

check mate! (again)

Is this the preview for season two of As ILW Turns ?

Dave, the baseball bat figurative speech needs not be misused and abused, but the fact remains (and I stand by it) that the First Amendment right of expression that you raised up doesn't apply in a private site because the terms of use designed by the owners reign far supreme thereat.

Anyway, the main issue for me here is the absence of moderation on ilw and the presence on immigrate2us. That's all there is to it. But then again, as I already said before, many of us toyed with the idea of not participating on this forum ever time and time again, but that it's easier to leave ilw than for ilw to leave us alone.

Well, you cannot bash immigrants and ask help for your undocumented spouse at the same time either on i2us. It's implied in their terms of use that they don't allow bigotry and hypocrisy in one poster at the same time. Tee-he-he!

'nite and thanks!

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Rough Neighbor,

Jigga JIgga !!!