Originally posted by Rough Neighbor: Read back, my friends. Yes, that, and see how I sprinkled more and more salt into his open wounds. Did you see his gangrene symptom post about Philippines in the other thread? More will come. Trust me. Remember: in hatred, the hater consumes more the hater than the hated. Yak yak yak!
God you are something I gotta tell ya. Your hubby must be lucky to have a woman like you. I like a woman is hot and wild. Rip my shirt apart, throw me on the bed and take the full control. You do fit the picture
If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans
Democrats - Brave enough to KILL our unborn, just NOT our ENEMIES!
Originally posted by Rough Neighbor: Be my guest, feel at home, help yourself, Hudson.
And I miss the days sharing what little I have, ProudUSC.
Appreciate the offer RN.
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams on Defense of the boston Massacre
Originally posted by Rough Neighbor: Read back, my friends. Yes, that, and see how I sprinkled more and more salt into his open wounds. Did you see his gangrene symptom post about Philippines in the other thread? More will come. Trust me. Remember: in hatred, the hater consumes more the hater than the hated. Yak yak yak!
God you are something I gotta tell ya. Your hubby must be lucky to have a woman like you. I like a woman is hot and wild. Rip my shirt apart, throw me on the bed and take the full control. You do fit the picture
What's the only difference between you and a rabid dog? Internet access! Hahaha!
"The letter of the law is a sword that killeth; its intent is a spirit that giveth life." (Justice Holmes on II Cor 3:6)
Originally posted by Rough Neighbor: Read back, my friends. Yes, that, and see how I sprinkled more and more salt into his open wounds. Did you see his gangrene symptom post about Philippines in the other thread? More will come. Trust me. Remember: in hatred, the hater consumes more the hater than the hated. Yak yak yak!
God you are something I gotta tell ya. Your hubby must be lucky to have a woman like you. I like a woman is hot and wild. Rip my shirt apart, throw me on the bed and take the full control. You do fit the picture
What's the only difference between you and a rabid dog? Internet access! Hahaha!
So when you meeting Davdah? Let me know so I can hook up with you and show you some tricks this dog can do.
Now you have got me all riled up
So shall we start with foreplay or directly jump to entree and then dessert
If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans
Democrats - Brave enough to KILL our unborn, just NOT our ENEMIES!
Originally posted by Rough Neighbor: Read back, my friends. Yes, that, and see how I sprinkled more and more salt into his open wounds. Did you see his gangrene symptom post about Philippines in the other thread? More will come. Trust me. Remember: in hatred, the hater consumes more the hater than the hated. Yak yak yak!
God you are something I gotta tell ya. Your hubby must be lucky to have a woman like you. I like a woman is hot and wild. Rip my shirt apart, throw me on the bed and take the full control. You do fit the picture
What's the only difference between you and a rabid dog? Internet access! Hahaha!
So when you meeting Davdah? Let me know so I can hook up with you and show you some tricks this dog can do.
Now you have got me all riled up
So shall we start with foreplay or directly jump to entree and then dessert
Be the big guy and let all this stuff go!!!!!!! Not fun being mean to people. Thank you, sincerely.
Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail. (Ralph Waldo Emerson)
Originally posted by Rough Neighbor: Case reopened sua sponte.
In the first evidence presented, you said first: "The link Rn posted is laughable." To which I responded accordingly. The key phrase of course is "in response to yours."
In the second evidence, there's nothing inflammatory there but something very discriminatory. How can I be called Filipina just because I have Filipino parentage? What makes me distinct from someone like you whose parents are from Europe? Please explain.
In your third evidence, you said first: "Foreign arrogance is astounding but predictable." However you deny it, this is a racial comment to which I just responded appropriately. Again, the key phrase is "in response to yours."
Finally, you said: "Very nice. Implying I don't know who my dad is. I am neither immigrant nor are my parents."
A statement that I find very difficult to reconcile with your very own statement that goes: "My mother's tongue is British, Dad's is I'm not sure. Either Austrian or Hungarian."
One whose mother is British and whose father is either (not sure) Austrian or Hungarian, claims neither to be an immigrant nor his parents.
I remember one of my religion teacher's words that anybody who claims not to have lied just commits another lie!
Bitter, me? Hahaha! After my candidate has just trounced yours? And your party's misfits are one by one tossed away to oblivion?
Think again.
Summary Judgment affirmed.
1: The statement made 'laughable' was clearly directed at the contents of the link, not the poster.
2: You yourself have said you were filipina. To simply re-state the same is not defamatory.
3: The idea of using British and tongue was to do with national origin. Not language since the actual British language is extinct. This was directed at people who understood the comment. You obviously missed the humor of it at the time.
4: I don't claim my status, it exists as a matter of fact.
5: Lastly, you are in no position acuse anyone of lying. If your going to use biblical quotes remember the one concerning the beam and speck. Remember the one concerning the first stone. Be careful when enlisting the bible as your ally. It often turns against its abuser.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: davdah,
The moment you capitulate to lawlessness you've lost your civility.
Posts: 9112 | Location: San Diego, or near by. | Registered: 06-08-2007
Originally posted by JCWin: Not all illegal immigrants are criminals and not all legal immigrants are not criminals. In fact a lot of illegal immigrants contribute more to this country than legal immigrants. But of course some people will say, illegal is illegal...
YES, THAT IS SO TRUE, MY FIANCE IS AN OUTSTANDING CITIZEN, WHO WOULD HELP ANYONE AT ANY TIME, AND WORKS HARDER THAN ANYONE I KNOW...BUT HES BEING HELD NOW, BECAUSE OF HIS STATUS...ITS LUDICROUS
"who are you to judge the way I live-i'm not perfect,or live to be but before you start pointing fingers,make sure your hands are clean".....B.M.
Posts: 80 | Location: usa | Registered: 11-22-2008
1. When posing a challenge, the challenger ought not to be onion-skinned or faint of heart. But valiant enough to face whatever repercussions. Prop 8 personified!
2. Restating one's other nationality is neither inflammatory nor defamatory. But restating it immaterially in an attempt to discredit the opponent in a debate is DISCRIMINATORY.
3. The jargon about British and tongue and extinct language, and yes, the belated attempt at "humor" is a flimsy scapegoat to shroud the glaring fact of ignorance to the real meaning of the phrase "mother tongue" that it has in fact nothing (zero, nada, nichts, niet, mafi, wala) to do with one's MOMMA.
4. Status that exists that as a matter of fact is no bigger a deal compared to many than what's being projected.
5. I stand steadfastly by the fact that I'm in the position to accuse anyone of and charge anybody with shameless lying anytime, anywhere, and anyway possible who claims not to be an immigrant in the US especially if he or she has himself or herself given the unsolicited information that his or her mother is British and his or her father is either (not sure) Austrian or Hungarian. And I'll continue to accept any kind of challenge to such position of mine from now and in the future.
Moreover, that I'm a Bible abuser, let's see. Look, using the Bible as an ally is one of the best decisions that a person can make. Yet abusing it tends to lead one to fundamentalist fanaticism - which I'm being accused of. I'm not sure if the few times that I've quoted Biblical lines on ilw.com discussions in support of my logical thoughts could amount to an abuse of the Holy Book. If it is, then so be it. I submit myself to the Supreme Judge. Because each time I'm doing so (on this forum or in my daily life), I'm at peace with my conscience and I'm in the perfect state of grace with my Savior.
Now let's see the Biblical passages that you've cited about the "speck in their brothers' eyes against the planks in the eyes of hypocrites" and "The Messiah's challenge to anyone without sin among the teachers of law and the Pharisses who accused a woman of adultery to cast the first stone."
Nice picks, also ones of my favorite parts. That when applied to our daily lives, can go something like this:
> you bigots towards foreigners and aliens who are just a speck of people in this country, don't forget that you are planks of immigrants too.
> those of you who are not immigrants, cast the first stone to the first foreigner that you will see in the street tomorrow.
You hypocrites!
... in favor of the non-moving party!
"The letter of the law is a sword that killeth; its intent is a spirit that giveth life." (Justice Holmes on II Cor 3:6)
There Is A man, 72 Years Old From The Philippines! Served In Usa Armed Forces, His Wife Also Of Philippines Decent. Don't Really See Them As Filipino, They Are Americans!!! Yet Extended Family, Draws Them Into Situations That Require Taking Sides As To Being Deceitful To Allow Another To Gain Entrance In USA Through Marrying USC Soley for GC. Being Ostracized and Deleted As The Punishment! These Are Americans I Truly Feel Sorry For!!! The Extended Family Expects Them To To Take Sides Of The Ways They No Longer Follow. Yet Not Going Along Will Alienate Them From The Rest 100%.
Ninang and Ninong Are Awesome People!!! Tita and Tito Also!!!! When Do Good People Get A Chance To Be Free???? Without Extended Family Bringing Them Into Situations They Really Do Not Want To Be A Part Of!!!! Philippines Smashing? Hater Of Filipino? So Many Have No Clue!!!! I AM AGAINST GREED, DECEIT, FRAUD!!! Tito Loves Those Persimmons! He Is Old and Tired, Served In USA Military. AMERICAN!!! Yet The Family Of Selfishness Try's Diligently To Include Those That Just Want Truth, Justice, And The American Way! Tito Loved The Yellow Tomatoes I Gave. So Many Here On This Board, Have No Idea!!!!
Once a Month I Visit My AMERICAN DECENT Friends Of Philippines Decent!!!! I Fight Against Those Filipinos Of Extended Family Of Deceit That Use Their Powers Of Grapevine Deliverance To Destroy The Ones That Disagree!!! Game Players!!! Selfishness And Greed!!!!
USC and Legal, Honest Immigrant Alike Must Fight Against Those That Deceive and Disrupt A Place Of Desirability! All Are Victims of Fraud, Both USC and Honest Immigrant Alike! The bad can and does make it more difficult for the good! Be careful who you blame!!! kami ay nanonood!!!
1: Not relevant to the issue. Again, stooping to slander indicates a poor argument.
2: The purpose was material to the discussion. To cause A9 to correct the photos to be more representative of your appearance. Nothing more than that. No evidence to suggest otherwise.
3: Wrong again. My statement stands on solid ground. The original British language of Celtic is extinct. There is also reference to British English just as there is American English. Seems to me you are implying some other meaning. What?
4: Nothing was being projected. You, as predictable as you are, made defamatory comments concerning my father and my origins. Why the need to mock my parents? Or were you trying to get a reckless response? No more an impact that a flea on a monkey's behind.
5: No, you don't have any right to accuse anyone. You are not a judge, or an attorney, nor God. Your accusatory nature reveals something about you though.
Concerning your biblical references. A quagmire exists. You quote the bible in one breath and in the next are gleeful of your candidate's victory. But your candidate supports removing any restraint on baby killing. Therefor you support killing babies in exchange for a better immigration policy. Another character revelation.
When you are blameless then you may have the God given right to use it. Until then, its abuse. You are just as guilty of every sin as the next. Your last comment is not in the Bible. I don't think God appreciates it being re-written. Grow some humility.
In closing, your comments are disrespectful only. Bearing no substantive value and wouldn't qualify as an argument. Inconsistent and mostly slanderous in content. But it makes me smile that I pissed you off, Good day.
The moment you capitulate to lawlessness you've lost your civility.
Posts: 9112 | Location: San Diego, or near by. | Registered: 06-08-2007
1. Posing a challenge but can't put up with the consequences is cowardice.
2. Throwing a racial comment, denying it, and not being able to stand by it manifests a serious lack of conviction.
3. But proud enough to admit that the meaning of the phrase "mother tongue" is new to you, that led up to the accidental revelation of your family origin.
4. Factual restatement of your origin leading up to the wrong perception that I'm mocking your parents is baseless. The same country references and exact words have been used couldn't be defamatory.
5. To accuse anybody of lying as long as I have sufficient proof to support it is my inalienable right - whoever I am and whatever I do. Only convincing evidence to prove that a child of British and Austrian/Hungarian parents isn't an immigrant can overrule that.
The Bible as part of all aspects of human existence is an undeniable principle, politics included.
My party totally submits to the rule of law, Roe v. Wade, that is the most supreme basis until today of and for this very divisive and hot-button issue. Using that position for political purposes to mean that we are "pro-abortion" is not only unethical and selfish, but also narrow-mindedness.
Stop smiling, that's mine to enjoy!
"The letter of the law is a sword that killeth; its intent is a spirit that giveth life." (Justice Holmes on II Cor 3:6)
Rough Neighbor, Please. Get over yourself. This isn't a trial. You're not a saint. And neither am I the boogey man.
Your accusations are laughable. Implying you have some special ability to detect truth or anything beyond what is flatly stated over a bulleton board is well, stupid.
This one is smiling, like me, because his parents were republican and don't view a child as punishment.
The moment you capitulate to lawlessness you've lost your civility.
Posts: 9112 | Location: San Diego, or near by. | Registered: 06-08-2007
Originally posted by davdah: ... When you are blameless then you may have the God given right to use it. Until then, its abuse. You are just as guilty of every sin as the next. Your last comment is not in the Bible. I don't think God appreciates it being re-written. Grow some humility.
In closing, your comments are disrespectful only. Bearing no substantive value and wouldn't qualify as an argument. Inconsistent and mostly slanderous in content. But it makes me smile that I pissed you off, Good day.
This is what I said:
____________________
Nice picks, also ones of my favorite parts. That when applied to our daily lives, can go something like this:
> you bigots towards foreigners and aliens who are just a speck of people in this country, don't forget that you are planks of immigrants too.
> those of you who are not immigrants, cast the first stone to the first foreigner that you will see in the street tomorrow.
You hypocrites! ____________________
Which is not in any kind of way an attempt to rewriting any Biblical text.
Next? Hahaha!
"The letter of the law is a sword that killeth; its intent is a spirit that giveth life." (Justice Holmes on II Cor 3:6)
Originally posted by davdah: Rough Neighbor, Please. Get over yourself. This isn't a trial. You're not a saint. And neither am I the boogey man.
Your accusations are laughable. Implying you have some special ability to detect truth or anything beyond what is flatly stated over a bulleton board is well, stupid.
...
Hahaha! Ah well... another scapegoat word appeared: "stupid" - which is not surprising because it's predictable. What else is there to expect? Yak yak yak!
"The letter of the law is a sword that killeth; its intent is a spirit that giveth life." (Justice Holmes on II Cor 3:6)
PORTLAND (AP) — The federal government plans to legalize certain unauthorized immigrants who applied for a 1986 amnesty program but were unfairly excluded or never received a response to their request.
It’s unknown how many people might be affected or how many in the Northwest, said Sharon Rummery, a Citizenship and Immigration Services spokeswoman in the San Francisco regional office.
CIS officials said the one-year period to reapply will begin Feb. 1. CIS is the government agency that oversees lawful immigration into the United States.
“It’s a pretty narrow category,’’ Rummery said.
The reincarnated 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, or IRCA, follows a class-action lawsuit settlement reached in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in September.
It was brought by the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project on behalf of individuals who were unable to apply or who were deemed ineligible for legalization under IRCA because of issues on whether unlawful status was known to the government, the lawsuit states.
The process is disliked by groups who oppose granting legal status to those who are in the nation illegally.
“Why in the world would our federal government do that when 22 years later, it still doesn’t have the ability to process applications filed in the 1986 amnesty program?’’ asked Jim Ludwick, the president of McMinnville-based Oregonians for Immigration Reform, which lobbies against illegal immigration.
“Our Social Security Administration is already overburdened. How would they deal with the possible millions who might apply?’’
He said it is “sheer idiocy’’ to encourage people to stay here when so many already are out of work.
But Francisco Lopez, director of CAUSA, an immigrant-advocacy group in Woodburn, sees it differently.
“It’s about time there was a resolution for the over 10,000 immigrants who were in immigration legal limbo because of the inefficiencies of the immigration office,’’ he said.
“Hopefully this will be the beginning not only for those who were not allowed to apply in 1986, but also any future legalizations for the millions that still have not been able to adjust their immigration status.’’
CAUSA and other immigrant groups across the nation will be pushing for a moratorium on immigration raids in the first 100 days of the Obama administration.
The latest settlement is the third class-action lawsuit filed against the CIS, previously known as the office of Immigration and Naturalization Services.
A settlement four years ago gave about 2,000 illegal immigrants legal status. IRCA resulted in roughly 2.7 million undocumented immigrants becoming legal permanent residents in 1986.
About 250,000 applications were rejected because applicants had temporarily left the U.S. during the designated grace period and had not lived here continuously.
But groups of undocumented immigrants successfully challenged the disqualifications.
Among the requirements for reapplying is proof of having entered the country legally on a temporary visa before 1982 and overstaying it.
Applicants must have no criminal history and had to have applied between May 5, 1987, and May 4, 1988.
Those who were wrongly rejected and who meet the qualifications will have to pay $585 to reapply. Those who never applied but who may still qualify will have to pay $1,130.
Though legalization is not guaranteed, the government cannot deport those who apply even if their applications are declined.
Add to del.icio.us
Yeah, me too, RN.
