Dems - Ya'll don't like when I expose Obama's inefficiencies, lack of intelligence, inexperience, cowardliness, deceitful tactics, phony promises and all that.
So here is my challenge to you all. Prove me whatever Obama is saying he will do, how will he do it? It is easier said than done. For example, he says he will create more jobs in USA. How? In what sector? How does he plan to implement it? What is the turn around time? How will that implementation go? Which class will be more beneficial? What will be the payscale? How sustainable that job will be? What age group will benefit more? What educational standard will be required? What skill sets will be required? What other economic benefits will it bring other than the income? Which industry will get more jobs? Do we have client base for that industry?
This is my challenge. If you want to have an intelligent debate lets have it. But be fully prepared to answer my attacks that will draw upon Financial, Marketing, Statistics, Mathematical, Economical as whole notions.
If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans
Democrats - Brave enough to KILL our unborn, just NOT our ENEMIES!
Originally posted by Brit4064: Frankly I'm bored of your attacks. This is an immigration forum not a political one. Go somewhere else and do it.
That is exactly when Dems are intellectually challenged, they come out with their ridiculous, whining excuses. They are all jumping the bandwagon and blaming Republicans and Bush for housing collapse, when it was individual who made an unsound financial decision. They still don't know President cannot pass any legislation. President only has authority to make the passed legislation into law. They still blame Bush. What are all the Dems in Capitol Hill doing?
If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans
Democrats - Brave enough to KILL our unborn, just NOT our ENEMIES!
Since you knew this hidden repository, I presume you are one of them and are here for the reverse psychology.
Assume all you want, since your head is too deep in your behind to comprehend obvious.
The guy is a straw man.
Now what kind of an idiot wastes so much time attacking a straw-man with dozens of threatds and hundreds of slurs here, polluting the board with the garbage that noone wants to read?
Unless you are a Muslim, of course. Which is just another word to describe an Idiot.
Have all the good s.ex you can, in all the ways you can, for as long as ever you can !
-- Sabuntium The Great
Posts: 928 | Location: Originally from: Galaxy of Centaurus A (also known as NGC 5128) | Registered: 06-26-2008
Since you knew this hidden repository, I presume you are one of them and are here for the reverse psychology.
Assume all you want, since your head is too deep in your behind to comprehend obvious.
The guy is a straw man.
Now what kind of an idiot wastes so much time attacking a straw-man with dozens of threatds and hundreds of slurs here, polluting the board with the garbage that noone wants to read?
Unless you are a Muslim, of course. Which is just another word to describe an Idiot.
Originally posted by Sabuntium: You can't even copy-paste a link
Dumb wannabee casanova, the term S E X will be converted to *** due to filtering. But to assist dumber like you, I have to insert space between the characters.
If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans
Democrats - Brave enough to KILL our unborn, just NOT our ENEMIES!
Originally posted by Sabuntium: You can't even copy-paste a link
Dumb wannabee casanova, the term S E X will be converted to *** due to filtering. But to assist dumber like you, I have to insert space between the characters.
Oh, didn't I tell this Idiot is on Ayatollahs' payroll
Have all the good s.ex you can, in all the ways you can, for as long as ever you can !
-- Sabuntium The Great
Posts: 928 | Location: Originally from: Galaxy of Centaurus A (also known as NGC 5128) | Registered: 06-26-2008
Good question. What has obama actually accomplished?
Did he help defeat communism like Mccain? No, he didn't. Did he even serve his country like McCain? No, he didn't.
Has he sponsored any bills in the Senate that benefited this country? Not the one for Africa, but for this country only? No he has not. So, exactly what has he done?
Who's side is he even on? Kenya, indonesia maybe?
You voted democrat. This country is not worth sneaking into any more.
Posts: 5738 | Location: San Antonio TX | Registered: 06-08-2007
The experience of Sarah alone is enough to beat Biden and Obama. Neither of them have ever dealt with budget and they are talking about economy. Neither of them have been involved in reform and Sarah has brought drastic reform. Sarah is proven and experience, Obama/Biden are well we all know - Big Talk, No Action, Big Talk, No Facts To Back It Up.
Every Democrat is whining on Sarah's foreign policy experience just because Biden has it. Do Dems even understand that it is PRESIDENT who makes foreign policies, not the VICE PRESIDENT. One will never find a PRESIDENT that has all the required skills but collectively with VP the entire package is presented.
So lets see Mc Cain has experience with National Security, Foreign Relations, Reforms. Sarah has executive experience, has dealt with Reforms, State Security, Budget, Economy.
What do Biden and Obama have? They have Biden Criminal Law created and passed in 1994. What does Obama have? Two memoirs, community organizer experience, state senate, US Senate where he has not voted on 290 items, where he has been absent voting 45%.
Even a high school kid can understand the drastic difference.
If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans
Democrats - Brave enough to KILL our unborn, just NOT our ENEMIES!
That is exactly when Dems are intellectually challenged, they come out with their ridiculous, whining excuses. They are all jumping the bandwagon and blaming Republicans and Bush for housing collapse, when it was individual who made an unsound financial decision. They still don't know President cannot pass any legislation. President only has authority to make the passed legislation into law. They still blame Bush. What are all the Dems in Capitol Hill doing?
Who said I was blaming Bush for all the c*ap you come up with in here??!! Go somewhere else and post it!
We voted Democrat. They'll be no need to sneak in anymore
Originally posted by a9b3h5: Dems - Ya'll don't like when I expose Obama's inefficiencies, lack of intelligence, inexperience, cowardliness, deceitful tactics, phony promises and all that.
The only thing you are exposing is your complete insipid and obtuse ignorance while posting articles that are more swift boat in nature than critiquing specifics in the Obama's proposals.
quote:
So here is my challenge to you all. Prove me whatever Obama is saying he will do, how will he do it? It is easier said than done. For example, he says he will create more jobs in USA. How? In what sector? How does he plan to implement it? What is the turn around time? How will that implementation go? Which class will be more beneficial? What will be the payscale? How sustainable that job will be? What age group will benefit more? What educational standard will be required? What skill sets will be required? What other economic benefits will it bring other than the income? Which industry will get more jobs? Do we have client base for that industry?
This also applies to Sen McCain's plan as well. Whether you like it or not, neither plan truly offers help for the economy, balanced budgets, and limited federal spending in both discretionary and non discretionary spending.
quote:
This is my challenge. If you want to have an intelligent debate lets have it. But be fully prepared to answer my attacks that will draw upon Financial, Marketing, Statistics, Mathematical, Economical as whole notions.
Why does anyone want to debate with a pompous, carpetbagger such as yourself. You do not debate, but insult everyone on this forum with your multiple id's whle and your remarks.
From page 21, "Under either Senator Obama’s or Senator McCain’s plan, however, the debt would likely continue to rise as it has over the past eight years, even under the CBO’s relatively optimistic assumptions about spending. Senator Obama’s plan would add $3.3 trillion to the national debt (including additional interest costs) while Senator McCain’s plan would add $4.3 trillion. This does not include the cost of expanding health insurance coverage and assumes that Senator McCain’s proposals phase in and phase out on schedule. It also assumes that all of the candidates’ optimistic revenue offsets materialize. If any of these assumptions turned out to be unwarranted, the national debt would grow even more."
And
From page 35, "Measured against current law in 2009, Senator Obama’s plan raises after-tax incomes by more than 5.5 percent for those in the bottom quintile and also provides more modest increases for those in the next three quintiles (figure 1). The top quintile would experience an average tax increase because of the hikes in the tax rates on capital gains and dividends and the increases in the top two individual income tax rates. The increase in taxes would be dramatic for those at the very top of the income scale, representing 8.7 percent of after-tax income for the top 1 percent of households and 11.5 percent of income for the richest 1 in 1,000. In contrast, the McCain plan would provide virtually no benefit to households in the bottom quintile, and very modest benefits to those in the next three quintiles. The top quintile would receive a tax cut of more than 3 percent of after-tax income. Within the top quintile, the richest 1 percent of households would receive an average tax cut of 3.4 percent. That figure rises to almost 4.4 percent for the top 0.1 percent of the income distribution."
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams on Defense of the boston Massacre
Add to del.icio.us
