quote:

As I said before, go buy some intelligence if they sell in walmart because you are the dumbest centric person I have ever seen in the world. Stop giving wrong advices in the field you don’t know **** about.

Wrong!

You have no idea just how much I know about immigration. How 'bout you? Apparently none at all, b/c if you did, you wouldn't be in the predicament you're in now of possibly losing your citizenship.

But aren't you supposed to be ignoring me anyway?

I would care less about your spouting. All questions were answered yet your pea-sized brain continues to give wrong advices from the very first post. I decided to step in to show other members how dumb and wrong you are, so others do not get hurt or put their fate in jeopardy by your wrong advices. Anyone on this message board will see how you kept giving wrong advices and misguiding others that are in need of help. Beware of this dumbass who misguides needy people. Keep spouting about everything you know nothing about. Mission accomplished.

Have you realized that the only dumb person in all of this is you? Not only do you possibly face some jail time, alcohol addiction rehab classes, points deducted off your insurance policy, points deducted off your driver's license, driving clases and others, you face the worst of them all: LOSING YOUR CITIZENSHIP!

Ask ANY immigrant member here in this here forum if they would just risk their Green Card, by driving and drinking?

Then tell me who's the dummy?

To Marmaduk, yes I am an attorney, sorry for not seeing your message earlier.

This reply is also to clear up something that drives me insane about the anti-immigrant groups, and that is the CONSTANT misuse of the phrase "rule of law". Earlier in this thread it was mentioned, so, at least for the benefit of those reading this thread, I am going to dispel the wholly incorrect interpretations people using that phrase have given it.

"Rule of Law" is an ancient phrase that was used by the Greeks. It stands for the notion, quite simply, that the GOVERNMENT should be bound by its own laws in society. It is an ideal of restraint on government action, the principle that governing bodies and powers should not be free to operate above the reach of the laws holding sway over the rest of us. The phrase does NOT mean "law and order", some notion of respect for the law and abidance by the people, or anything of the sort, which is exactly how it is being misused today by anti-immigrant groups, or indeed any group essentially touting the virtues of enforcement and such.

So, in summation, STOP USING THIS PHRASE IN THIS MANNER!! "Rule of Law" applies to the GOVERNMENT, not individual civilians. Keep hating immigrants, since no amount of reason will stop that inclination, but at least stop butchering your own language while doing it.

quote:

dmartmar
Frequent Member

Posted November 06, 2006 10:55 AM Hide Post
Have you realized that the only dumb person in all of this is you? Not only do you possibly face some jail time, alcohol addiction rehab classes, points deducted off your insurance policy, points deducted off your driver's license, driving clases and others, you face the worst of them all: LOSING YOUR CITIZENSHIP!

Ask ANY immigrant member here in this here forum if they would just risk their Green Card, by driving and drinking?

Then tell me who's the dummy?

Once again Mr. dumbass has spoken the mighty misguiding words. I personally do not give a **** about what you write here and the only person I must justify myself before is the “Municipal Court Judge”. But I will not let you misguide others.

dmartmar
Frequent Member

Posted November 06, 2006 10:55 AM November 06, 2006 10:55 AM
Hide Post

Have you realized that the only dumb person in all of this is you? Not only do you possibly face some jail time, alcohol addiction rehab classes, points deducted off your insurance policy, points deducted off your driver's license, driving clases and others, you face the worst of them all: LOSING YOUR CITIZENSHIP!

Ask ANY immigrant member here in this here forum if they would just risk their Green Card, by driving and drinking?

Then tell me who's the dummy?

In NJ there is no jail time for first DUI if nothing else is involved like killing other person, accident etc. Jail time is not mandatory and it’s only at the discretion of court if anything else was involved in it.

I might require the SR-22 insurance only if the court decides to do so. Statistics have shown that not a single simple DUI for first time requires the person to have SR-22. Insurance will almost remain the same.

You have to attend the DUI classes 6 hours per day for 2 days.

Stop giving wrong advices about losing your citizenship and do not misguide others. Read the previous posts in the same topic.

Please, just ask the other immigrants in this forum if they would even risk their GC applications.

And let's see how your predicament turns out in the end, the moment your "made up by the police, drunk driving" video is shown in court. Then you can talk to me.

Oh yeah, and btw, statistics are just that, statistics.

quote:

Originally posted by dmartmar:
Please, just ask the other immigrants in this forum if they would even risk their GC applications.

Oh yeah and statistics are just that, statistics.

Now that you have stopped misguiding others, I am happy for you. Chao.

He who laughs last, last best.

Chao!

Quick update :- An appeal to NJ Municipal court was done for a speedy trial requesting all related material “discovery” from Police Department.

quote:

Quick update :- An appeal to NJ Municipal court was done for a speedy trial requesting all related material “discovery” from Police Department.

So basically, instead of a slow and painful screew, you're going to get screewed quicker.

Just make sure than in either case, the use of K1 jelly is involved.

Mr. Dumbass – you will be ignored as long as you do not misguide others. If you give wrong advices and misguide people because you don’t know **** about it, I will have to reply to kick your butt just like I did before and show you the right place for you. Bye for now.

quote:

Mr. Dumbass – you will be ignored as long as you do not misguide others. If you give wrong advices and misguide people because you don’t know **** about it, I will have to reply to kick your butt just like I did before and show you the right place for you.

Mr. Dumbass sits at home, cracks open another bottle of beer, his 6th one by the way, reads over the OP's current situation and thinks to himself: "thank God it is his dumb a*s the one in court and not mine. Cheers!"

This message has been edited. Last edited by: dmartmar,

the OP is nothing more (and much less) than a typical dirtbag who forgets he drove under the influence and now wants some equally sleazy lawyer (are there any other kind??) to try and convince some judge that the cops were wrong!! Bull$hit! This drunken slimeball conveniently forgot that he could have killed someone while driving drunk and that statistically he will, then try to get off blaming cops. What a slime.
I hope we NEVER give you citizenship, dip$hit. Whine whine whine. Eff you. I hope that the judge fines you up the a$$, shreds your driver's license and that we, the citizens (not residents, mind you) NEVER EVER award you citizenship. Go have a another beer, phuquephace, and buy one for your lawyer too.

quote:

the OP is nothing more (and much less) than a typical dirtbag who forgets he drove under the influence and now wants some equally sleazy lawyer (are there any other kind??) to try and convince some judge that the cops were wrong!! Bull$hit! This drunken slimeball conveniently forgot that he could have killed someone while driving drunk and that statistically he will, then try to get off blaming cops. What a slime.

I hope we NEVER give you citizenship, dip$hit. Whine whine whine. Eff you. I hope that the judge fines you up the a$$, shreds your driver's license and that we, the citizens (not residents, mind you) NEVER EVER award you citizenship.

Go have a another beer, phuquephace, and buy one for your lawyer too.

S12, you, I and the lawyer already know the OP's chances of coming out clean are zero to none. Otherwise, why would he request a speedy trial?

If regular people like you and me feel the way we do about law breaking immigrants, judges can't be that much far off from us!

This message has been edited. Last edited by: dmartmar,

quote:

Originally posted by dmartmar:

quote:

the OP is nothing more (and much less) than a typical dirtbag who forgets he drove under the influence and now wants some equally sleazy lawyer (are there any other kind??) to try and convince some judge that the cops were wrong!! Bull$hit! This drunken slimeball conveniently forgot that he could have killed someone while driving drunk and that statistically he will, then try to get off blaming cops. What a slime.

I hope we NEVER give you citizenship, dip$hit. Whine whine whine. Eff you. I hope that the judge fines you up the a$$, shreds your driver's license and that we, the citizens (not residents, mind you) NEVER EVER award you citizenship.

Go have a another beer, phuquephace, and buy one for your lawyer too.

S12, you, I and the lawyer already know the OP's chances of coming out clean are zero to none. Otherwise, why would he request a speedy trial?

If regular people like you and me feel the way we do about law breaking immigrants, judges can't be that much far off from us!

Mr. dumbass has done it again and proved that he is the dumbest person in the world who must spout in everything that he does not know **** about. Everyone has a right to speedy trial according to 4th amendment. Speedy trials force the authorities to produce discovery in a short time. If discovery is not produced in timely manner which is not uncommon, the state case has negative impact on the prosecutor’s side. Conclusion – chances for plea bargain or dismissal are increased. Dumbass go buy some intelligence at walmart if they sell it.

The right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment has nothing to do with a defendant's ambition to avoid criminal prosecution. A request for speedy trial is only a request to face the judge and jury as soon as possible, and because of that it's incompatible with any desire to avoid the criminal justice system.
-THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE-

That’s right. It does not provide any relief for the defense but in the court case archive if you read actual cases. It is not uncommon to dismiss the case or bring it to plea bargain where the state fails to provide the discovery in timely manner. Hopefully, Mr. Dumbass dmartmar will understand that he shouldn’t be spouting about things that he doesn’t know **** about.

Houston,

Are you a lawyer? Can I ask you couple of questions?

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Lookingforhelp,

I do NOT come here to give advice, much less legal advice, to other posters. You already have an attorney, you can obtain legal advice from your attorney and get the most out of your retainer.
The description of the offense and the penalties prescribed for it are supposed to be the result of careful analysis and consideration by those in charge of the legislation, it's not MY place or YOUR place or anybody else's place to distort or even alter the nature of an offense beyond what's already prescribed by the law itself. The nature and consequences your offense are prescribed by the law, not by others in a message board or chat room.
Again, if you need legal advice you should always consult with your attorney.
-THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE-

Thanks. I understand your point but sometimes lawyers do not have answers to all questions which are related to other fields. I appreciate your advices and help in this thread.