Yes, but that too is elective, especially when one is not the 'intended' user.
___________________________________________________________________ "The letter of the law is a sword that killeth; its intent is a spirit that giveth life."
Originally posted by Rough Neighbor: Why would I prove you wrong when you have not proved that I AM a Liar you dipchit. the burdon of proof of this statement is on you.
Ok, you want proof? I said it before and I'm saying it again now. You asked for it, I'll be happy to give it to you back again and again on end. This is your exact forum profile:
FRom The World according to ignoramus RN
>>> Oops! Now you think you’re in a WORLD other than mine? ‘Ignoramus, me?’ I’m telling you, insulting me doesn’t make you or your own WORLD any greater. No, it doesn’t work that way in my world. Or let me put it this way. What you show outside is the reflection of what’s inside. Or there is truth in the saying that: ‘it can be heard on the opposite end of the line when one smiles while talking on the phone.’ I’m dead sure, you never smile nor are you happy while we discuss. Perhaps insulting others while discussing in your country of origin, or in your original culture, or even in your present household, is a ‘norm.’
Right back in the socket @ you. LOOK in the mirror and open your eyes. You seem to have a chip on your shoulder. Just read some of your responses to the members here. You seem as miserable as it gets with some of your incoherent ramblings. Yet you seem to feel you are somehow superior to DCTECH in conversation. Seriously. Your arrogance has confused you about yourself.
> an immigrant with skinhead and nativist mentality.
[color:RED]Sling a Lie Now Prove it
>>> Oops, again! I don’t think this is a very acceptable sentence construction in English. This reminds me of somebody on this board who has exactly the same writing style.
Proof that you're an immigrant with nativist and skinhead mentality? Too many to mention actually, but I’ll give you at least one proof that stands out: your single-handed and unadulterated support for BEVERLY up to the end (and down the wire). Ah well, bad things don't last. And the rest is history.
That is your proof??? B. Please. Where's your proof? You got nothing as I knew you had nothing. Just Lies and mudslinging
> attacks the government leadership for all other matters, but attacks people when it comes to immigration. It is both with me. Balanced guilt on the illegal matter. YOurs is one sided and unbalanced..Illegals do no wrong in your book of rules.
>>> I don’t know what other way there is to translate this: “... when you get your citizenship in a few years and petition for your brothers and sisters, then you will understand how long that wait is. And I am sure you will be upset if the guy who snuck in and demanded to be made legal was made legal while your sister or brother are still waiting in line legally 8 years later. this is the outrage my friend. those of us who have had relative legally waiting in line for years.â€
‘Illegals do no wrong in my book of rules?’ Please try to translate my consistent position on the matter:
"I support a peaceable discussion and resolution of the current mess.
I support the idea that the current immigration situation is dismally broken that needs comprehensive reform.
I support a top to bottom accounting of those who are here and entering here in order to separate the acceptable ones from the misfits, and for the problem to not happen again.
I support the end to all bad guys enjoying the cover of the current mess.
I support the idea of putting everything in order.
You believe in Comprehensive Immigration Reward very simply put.
> questions the slow visa process for own case (pending sibling petitions), but blames the illegals instead of blaming the government.
Prove this statement. No wonder you defend Hudson's spelling.. It is because he lets you borrow the crystal ball.
>>> Very well proven and documented above.
Sorry RN.. Not proven above. You lose on this one ... you failed again with your assumptions and crystal ball. NO WHERE in this forum have I ever stated that in regards to myself that I was waiting. It is a pertinent issue with me however.. especially in regards to ILLEGALS being made residents while law abiding intending immigrants wait in line. My family is all here now FYI.
Hudson’s spelling lapses? You're still on that topic? How many times do I have to tell you that it’s more than that? Ok, let’s say I side with Hudson (and a whole bunch of others). You side with BEVERLY and DCWTECH (plus your identical writing style). No crystal ball on our side, pinky. Change that to ‘crystal logic and reasoning skills.’
> claims to be more AMERICAN than the rest, but so un-American say, for not trying to polish up English language skills for a start. Evidence? Messy posts in blatant violation of basic grammar and writing rules. (Hopefully English writing is not required in your full-time job).
Again.. You have no proof of the statement as you CLAIM!. All you can sing is Beverly and Dctech because they were unpopular on the board. Pray tell little mantis.. just what do Beverly or DCTECH have to do with the Lie that you wrote above?? I will answer that 4u.. NOTHING.
You our own futile attempt to malign me has backfired. You could not produce the "so called proof" for the lies that you printed. YOu have insulted yourself. I didnt have to.
You suffer from false memory syndrome... Please find this statement that I never made or implied .... Give it up RN mental case. There is nothing wrong with my English and/or writing skills.
>>> Give it up, pinky. Insulting others in a debate doesn’t necessarily lend or amount to an advantage. It works the opposite way actually. It simply shows one to be so miserable, or sometimes laughable altogether. It just shows one’s futile and failing effort to argue equally in a level playing field.
But alright, in fairness, I can see a modicum of improvement in your manner of expression. That’s a good headstart. I mean by constantly communicating with me, you’re geared towards the right direction.
> too effeminate to be a man (avatar-obsession and of all colors why PINK?), but too obtrusive to be a woman (Hah! like a raging tiger when teased). [/i] Your eluding to me being g a y so often indicates to me that your appear to be homophobic. This fits in with your narrow minded personality
>>> Only one word covers all: PINK!
You'll use nails and teeth to 'deny' these points. Anyhow, what else is new? But, bingo! that soundly proves my point, you're a LIAR.
Therefore, 'the burdon, ehe! burden of proof' is absolutely 'overcome' beyond reasonable doubt![/b]
NOT EVEN A LITTLE BIT RN. These are your reasoning skills??? Write a lie then Make the lie real in your mind?
No RN.. I will have just proved that you are the LIAR here when you will not be able to find the so called supporting proof for all the lies you wrote above.
>>> What did I say previously? I said: ‘You’ll use nails and teeth to ‘deny’ these points.’ You just did abundantly. I’m as correct now as ever before. Case closed! Thats right. CASE CLOSED AS YOU DID NOT COME UP WITH EVEN 1 PEICE of evidence to support your lies.
But once again, c’mon you ‘fr iggin idiot,’ what other meaning do you want attributed to this statement of yours: ‘You are the novice here in realizing these things RN, not me. I have known for many years about how usa government politically does with certain groups.’? Tell me, you ‘fr iggin idiot!’
I have already told you, but you are too dense to accept the truth.
>>> If you’re referring to your own brand of ‘truth?’ Haha! Ah well... no, thanks!
RN SOAPBOX RANT: Huh! ‘spelling/language police.’ That’s not the point! It’s more than just spelling or grammar... always remember, it’s far, far more than that... it’s the value of the English language that this country holds dear and high, yes, this very country that adopted you.
ROFL. Sounds like a personal problem 2me.if only you knew how stupid you sound. Get a grip Bip.
Ditto again.
>>> Listen, and listen very carefully please. When somebody says ‘how stupid you sound,’ and that somebody is the same person who thinks that BEVERLY and DCWTECH are cool, well, don’t fret, because by following the same line of twisted logic, it may mean the opposite way, that you’re a ‘genius’ at best, or ‘intelligent’ at least! [/QUOTE]
Oh boy.. Now RN.. you are adding another Lie to the already outrageous lies above that you manifested. Please provide the link/proof from your crystal ball to support where I disclosed that little tidbit about Beverly and DCTECH.
You have showed your true colors. (no pun intended) I havent changed. Not in my writings or in what I stand for and/or against. This is about who you dont like/or who does not support your view of things, or illegal/undocumented immigration. You attacked Beverly because she was against illegal immigration. You attack DCTECH because he spoke badly of fillipinos. GOT 2 words 4u. Public forum. A public forum with current rules that allows the type of speech that they both wrote. The same forum that allows Manali to post his threads that disturb so many. What irks you is that there is nothing you can do about it unless the game rules change.
So in addition to sounding stupid.. you are also writing stupidly. Somewhere in your oxygen deprived brain you will have to discern that popularity and respect are not the same thing. You speak about Beverly and DCTECH because they were not popular etc. and you spoke about Beverly and how I stood in my path of standing up for her . RN's reasoning... because everybody here wanted her gone that it must have been the right thing. same with DCTECH. Well here is something for you to read and ponder.
The Road Not Taken
by Robert Frost
TWO roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both And be one traveler, long I stood And looked down one as far as I could To where it bent in the undergrowth;
Then took the other, as just as fair, And having perhaps the better claim, Because it was grassy and wanted wear; Though as for that the passing there Had worn them really about the same, 10
And both that morning equally lay In leaves no step had trodden black. Oh, I kept the first for another day! Yet knowing how way leads on to way, I doubted if I should ever come back.
I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I— I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference.
Originally posted by davdah: All are the intended users once the 'Post Now' button is pressed. Otherwise, use PM to limit the contributing audiance.
Ahhh haha! This reminds me of something so familiar. Haha! I thought the complaint was that ‘the rants and insults that were humorous but due to too many colors and too much bold’ were getting tough on the eyes?!?! This relates solely in the area of ‘reading’ some posted ‘rants and insults’ between posters to me. Wherefore I said ‘reading’ of a posted message is optional! Then the matter of ‘ease of use’ was raised by you, which I presumed to still be about ‘reading’ such postings. Which of course was ‘elective’ still I said (meaning: you may read them or you may not), especially because anyway the ‘colorful and bold’ exchanges were not ‘intended’ for you though you’re a forum ‘user.’ But, the phrase ‘intended user’ was again (un)skillfully twisted and spun to cover not only the issue of ‘reading’ but the issue of ‘posting’ as well, and tried to appear justified. Typical.
___________________________________________________________________ "The letter of the law is a sword that killeth; its intent is a spirit that giveth life."
'Intended user' that pertains to 'reading' that you want to mean 'posting.' That's the issue... Tiger.
___________________________________________________________________ "The letter of the law is a sword that killeth; its intent is a spirit that giveth life."
Originally posted by 4now: 4now responses to the lies are in green
>>> Oh, now it’s green. Going organic! Next time try yellow as what DCWTECH suggested. Who knows? Maybe when you finished up all colors of the rainbow you can finally get a grip. But I don’t think it works that way though. Regardless of color, nonsense is nonsense.
Right back in the socket @ you. LOOK in the mirror and open your eyes. You seem to have a chip on your shoulder. Just read some of your responses to the members here. You seem as miserable as it gets with some of your incoherent ramblings. >>> Well, show me please my incoherent ramblings. The same way I do with yours that you end up denying and twisting. Yet you seem to feel you are somehow superior to DCTECH in conversation. Seriously. Your arrogance has confused you about yourself. >>> Ah no, I don’t feel superior to anyone. That’s another baseless charge. But the point is that, DCWTECH doesn’t make any sense at all. When somebody talks nonsense to you, whoever you are or whatever little capabilities you have, that makes you appear like Einstein. Very big difference.
That is your proof??? B. Please. Where's your proof? You got nothing as I knew you had nothing. Just Lies and mudslinging
>>> Yeah, at least I always have the common decency to support whatever I say with proof. But the thing is, you just ‘twist’ or ‘deny’ them and accuse me of telling lies and mudslinging. Not a bit surprised though, knowing you so well by now.
You believe in Comprehensive Immigration Reward very simply put.
>>> The momentum is there, even a strong clamor from several quarters, for a Comprehensive Immigration Reform to overhaul the currently broken and outdated immigration system.
I believe that it’s necessary, even inevitable, for the good of America. To which you are opposed, and go to the extent of calling it Comprehensive Immigration Reward.
On the other hand, I strongly support it, because I believe that the current mess, or the ‘status quo’ shouldn’t last much longer. It’s problematic, it’s controversial, it’s painful, it’s dangerous, it’s unacceptable, and unjustifiable to even be happening within a country like the great, old USA.
‘Reform’ is broad, meant to be, and ‘legalization’ (that you narrowly refer to as ‘reward’), may or may not be its integral ‘component’ for those who are already here and otherwise eligible to be covered, based on some set of ‘qualifiers’ that Congress may formulate, that would put them back at the end of the line or behind the regular queue.
You are against the whole ‘forest’ because of a single ‘tree.’ Ah well, I have my own description of such a position: ‘an immigrant with a nativist and skinhead mentality!’
Sorry RN.. Not proven above. You lose on this one ... you failed again with your assumptions and crystal ball. NO WHERE in this forum have I ever stated that in regards to myself that I was waiting. It is a pertinent issue with me however.. especially in regards to ILLEGALS being made residents while law abiding intending immigrants wait in line. >>> Denial, denial, and more undying denial! You’re the one who said this, again just to remind you: ‘... while your sister or brother are still waiting in line legally 8 years later. this is the outrage my friend. those of us who have had relative legally waiting in line for years.’ http://discuss.ilw.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/902603441/m/6...10195341#40110195341. Oh, well... My family is all here now FYI. >>> Nice to hear that, but the fact that they’re already here is not the point. It’s the difference between us on whom we put the blame. But the family-preference 4th category (sibling petition) has advanced so fast for you. Maybe you have filed the I-130 in the 80s or 90s, or maybe after the I-130 was/were pending, it was an employment-based or marriage to USC later? Genuine?
Again.. You have no proof of the statement as you CLAIM!. All you can sing is Beverly and Dctech because they were unpopular on the board. Pray tell little mantis.. just what do Beverly or DCTECH have to do with the Lie that you wrote above?? I will answer that 4u.. NOTHING.
You our own futile attempt to malign me has backfired. You could not produce the "so called proof" for the lies that you printed. YOu have insulted yourself. I didnt have to.
Thats right. CASE CLOSED AS YOU DID NOT COME UP WITH EVEN 1 PEICE of evidence to support your lies.
>>> Mess… I mean, Miss 4now. It’s a matter of opinion. I did my part, you did yours complete with your ‘denying’ and ‘twisting’ ways.
Oh boy.. Now RN.. you are adding another Lie to the already outrageous lies above that you manifested. Please provide the link/proof from your crystal ball to support where I disclosed that little tidbit about Beverly and DCTECH.
You have showed your true colors. (no pun intended) I havent changed. Not in my writings or in what I stand for and/or against. This is about who you dont like/or who does not support your view of things, or illegal/undocumented immigration. You attacked Beverly because she was against illegal immigration. You attack DCTECH because he spoke badly of fillipinos. GOT 2 words 4u. Public forum. A public forum with current rules that allows the type of speech that they both wrote. The same forum that allows Manali to post his threads that disturb so many. What irks you is that there is nothing you can do about it unless the game rules change.
So in addition to sounding stupid.. you are also writing stupidly. Somewhere in your oxygen deprived brain you will have to discern that popularity and respect are not the same thing. You speak about Beverly and DCTECH because they were not popular etc. and you spoke about Beverly and how I stood in my path of standing up for her . RN's reasoning... because everybody here wanted her gone that it must have been the right thing. same with DCTECH. Well here is something for you to read and ponder.
>>> Haha! You’re so funny even when you’re throwing insults. One phrase covers all: PINK MESS!
___________________________________________________________________ "The letter of the law is a sword that killeth; its intent is a spirit that giveth life."
Originally posted by 4now: 4now responses to the lies are in green
>>> Oh, now it’s green. Going organic! Next time try yellow as what DCWTECH suggested. Who knows? Maybe when you finished up all colors of the rainbow you can finally get a grip. But I don’t think it works that way though. Regardless of color, nonsense is nonsense.
Right back in the socket @ you. LOOK in the mirror and open your eyes. You seem to have a chip on your shoulder. Just read some of your responses to the members here. You seem as miserable as it gets with some of your incoherent ramblings. >>> Well, show me please my incoherent ramblings. The same way I do with yours that you end up denying and twisting. Yet you seem to feel you are somehow superior to DCTECH in conversation. Seriously. Your arrogance has confused you about yourself. >>> Ah no, I don’t feel superior to anyone. That’s another baseless charge. But the point is that, DCWTECH doesn’t make any sense at all. When somebody talks nonsense to you, whoever you are or whatever little capabilities you have, that makes you appear like Einstein. Very big difference.
That is your proof??? B. Please. Where's your proof? You got nothing as I knew you had nothing. Just Lies and mudslinging
>>> Yeah, at least I always have the common decency to support whatever I say with proof. But the thing is, you just ‘twist’ or ‘deny’ them and accuse me of telling lies and mudslinging. Not a bit surprised though, knowing you so well by now.
You believe in Comprehensive Immigration Reward very simply put.
>>> The momentum is there, even a strong clamor from several quarters, for a Comprehensive Immigration Reform to overhaul the currently broken and outdated immigration system.
I believe that it’s necessary, even inevitable, for the good of America. To which you are opposed, and go to the extent of calling it Comprehensive Immigration Reward.
On the other hand, I strongly support it, because I believe that the current mess, or the ‘status quo’ shouldn’t last much longer. It’s problematic, it’s controversial, it’s painful, it’s dangerous, it’s unacceptable, and unjustifiable to even be happening within a country like the great, old USA.
‘Reform’ is broad, meant to be, and ‘legalization’ (that you narrowly refer to as ‘reward’), may or may not be its integral ‘component’ for those who are already here and otherwise eligible to be covered, based on some set of ‘qualifiers’ that Congress may formulate, that would put them back at the end of the line or behind the regular queue.
You are against the whole ‘forest’ because of a single ‘tree.’ Ah well, I have my own description of such a position: ‘an immigrant with a nativist and skinhead mentality!’
Sorry RN.. Not proven above. You lose on this one ... you failed again with your assumptions and crystal ball. NO WHERE in this forum have I ever stated that in regards to myself that I was waiting. It is a pertinent issue with me however.. especially in regards to ILLEGALS being made residents while law abiding intending immigrants wait in line. >>> Denial, denial, and more undying denial! You’re the one who said this, again just to remind you: ‘... while your sister or brother are still waiting in line legally 8 years later. this is the outrage my friend. those of us who have had relative legally waiting in line for years.’ http://discuss.ilw.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f//m/6...#. Oh, well... My family is all here now FYI. >>> Nice to hear that, but the fact that they’re already here is not the point. It’s the difference between us on whom we put the blame. But the family-preference 4th category (sibling petition) has advanced so fast for you. Maybe you have filed the I-130 in the 80s or 90s, or maybe after the I-130 was/were pending, it was an employment-based or marriage to USC later? Genuine?
Again.. You have no proof of the statement as you CLAIM!. All you can sing is Beverly and Dctech because they were unpopular on the board. Pray tell little mantis.. just what do Beverly or DCTECH have to do with the Lie that you wrote above?? I will answer that 4u.. NOTHING.
You our own futile attempt to malign me has backfired. You could not produce the "so called proof" for the lies that you printed. YOu have insulted yourself. I didnt have to.
Thats right. CASE CLOSED AS YOU DID NOT COME UP WITH EVEN 1 PEICE of evidence to support your lies.
>>> Mess… I mean, Miss 4now. It’s a matter of opinion. I did my part, you did yours complete with your ‘denying’ and ‘twisting’ ways.
Oh boy.. Now RN.. you are adding another Lie to the already outrageous lies above that you manifested. Please provide the link/proof from your crystal ball to support where I disclosed that little tidbit about Beverly and DCTECH.
You have showed your true colors. (no pun intended) I havent changed. Not in my writings or in what I stand for and/or against. This is about who you dont like/or who does not support your view of things, or illegal/undocumented immigration. You attacked Beverly because she was against illegal immigration. You attack DCTECH because he spoke badly of fillipinos. GOT 2 words 4u. Public forum. A public forum with current rules that allows the type of speech that they both wrote. The same forum that allows Manali to post his threads that disturb so many. What irks you is that there is nothing you can do about it unless the game rules change.
So in addition to sounding stupid.. you are also writing stupidly. Somewhere in your oxygen deprived brain you will have to discern that popularity and respect are not the same thing. You speak about Beverly and DCTECH because they were not popular etc. and you spoke about Beverly and how I stood in my path of standing up for her . RN's reasoning... because everybody here wanted her gone that it must have been the right thing. same with DCTECH. Well here is something for you to read and ponder.
>>> Haha! You’re so funny even when you’re throwing insults. One phrase covers all: PINK MESS!
Originally posted by 4now: 4now responses to the lies are in green 4now the responses will be brown
>>> Oh, now it’s green. Going organic! Next time try yellow as what DCWTECH suggested. Who knows? Maybe when you finished up all colors of the rainbow you can finally get a grip. But I don’t think it works that way though. Regardless of color, nonsense is nonsense.
I figured it was appropriate to use brown for the p oopsy that you continue to sling.
Right back in the socket @ you. LOOK in the mirror and open your eyes. You seem to have a chip on your shoulder. Just read some of your responses to the members here. You seem as miserable as it gets with some of your incoherent ramblings. >>> Well, show me please my incoherent ramblings. The same way I do with yours that you end up denying and twisting.
No you have not shown any incoherent ramblings from me. Where are they??? Maybe you have falsely played them in your bipolar mind. But to show you an example of your own... Take a look at your post to Davdah.. four posts above. This is a perfect example.
Yet you seem to feel you are somehow superior to DCTECH in conversation. Seriously. Your arrogance has confused you about yourself. >>> Ah no, I don’t feel superior to anyone. That’s another baseless charge. But the point is that, DCWTECH doesn’t make any sense at all. When somebody talks nonsense to you, whoever you are or whatever little capabilities you have, that makes you appear like Einstein. Very big difference.
A baseless charge..?? Really? You just wrote a condescending putdown on DCTECH in your above statement that he doesnt make any sense at all. YOu are a pompous one whose sole intent is to try to make some members feel inferior in order to try to make yourself feel superior. Classic Chip on your shoulder with low self esteem to put others down to make you feel better about yourself.
That is your proof??? B. Please. Where's your proof? You got nothing as I knew you had nothing. Just Lies and mudslinging
>>> Yeah, at least I always have the common decency to support whatever I say with proof. But the thing is, you just ‘twist’ or ‘deny’ them and accuse me of telling lies and mudslinging. Not a bit surprised though, knowing you so well by now.
Support with proof? You are kidding right?. You print some quotes or posts of mine that have nothing to do with the "so called proof" you claim to have to back up your lies. None of the below links that you have posted support your claims. DUH
You believe in Comprehensive Immigration Reward very simply put.
Drum Roll for your Soapbox Rant on why illegals should be made legal. BTW Comprehensive immigration reform should not have anything to do with illegals. It should only be addressing the problems associated with legal immigrants and related family matters. Illegals being addressed should not even be in those proposals. These reforms could have been approved many times over if illegals were not inappropriately placed in the proposals .
>>> The momentum is there, even a strong clamor from several quarters, for a Comprehensive Immigration Reform to overhaul the currently broken and outdated immigration system.
I believe that it’s necessary, even inevitable, for the good of America. To which you are opposed, and go to the extent of calling it Comprehensive Immigration Reward.
On the other hand, I strongly support it, because I believe that the current mess, or the ‘status quo’ shouldn’t last much longer. It’s problematic, it’s controversial, it’s painful, it’s dangerous, it’s unacceptable, and unjustifiable to even be happening within a country like the great, old USA.
‘Reform’ is broad, meant to be, and ‘legalization’ (that you narrowly refer to as ‘reward’), may or may not be its integral ‘component’ for those who are already here and otherwise eligible to be covered, based on some set of ‘qualifiers’ that Congress may formulate, that would put them back at the end of the line or behind the regular queue.
You are against the whole ‘forest’ because of a single ‘tree.’ Ah well, I have my own description of such a position: ‘an immigrant with a nativist and skinhead mentality!’ NOW YOU HAVE IT CORRECT.. YOUR OWN OPINION WITH YOUR OWN DESCRIPTION. Who the Falafel are you, other than being the bipolar , miserable and delusional 4now thread stalker that you are.
Sorry RN.. Not proven above. You lose on this one ... you failed again with your assumptions and crystal ball. NO WHERE in this forum have I ever stated that in regards to myself that I was waiting. It is a pertinent issue with me however.. especially in regards to ILLEGALS being made residents while law abiding intending immigrants wait in line.
>>> Denial, denial, and more undying denial! You’re the one who said this, again just to remind you: ‘... while your sister or brother are still waiting in line legally 8 years later. this is the outrage my friend. those of us who have had relative legally waiting in line for years.’ http://discuss.ilw.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/902603441/m/6...10195341#40110195341. Oh, well... My family is all here now FYI. >>> Nice to hear that, but the fact that they’re already here is not the point. It’s the difference between us on whom we put the blame. But the family-preference 4th category (sibling petition) has advanced so fast for you. Maybe you have filed the I-130 in the 80s or 90s, or maybe after the I-130 was/were pending, it was an employment-based or marriage to USC later? Genuine?
Denial of what RN.. It is you who insists on whatever it is that is in your brain. Im beginning to believe that maybe you are psycho or something. You can place link again and again. it does not change the outcome. Your so called proof does not support your position.
[color:GREEN]Again.. You have no proof of the statement as you CLAIM!. All you can sing is Beverly and Dctech because they were unpopular on the board. Pray tell little mantis.. just what do Beverly or DCTECH have to do with the Lie that you wrote above?? I will answer that 4u.. NOTHING.
You our own futile attempt to malign me has backfired. You could not produce the "so called proof" for the lies that you printed. YOu have insulted yourself. I didnt have to.
Again..RN.. You continue to miserably fail at providing proof. You have yet to find where 4now "claims to be more american than others.. nor have you found where 4now has claimed that DCTECh and BEVERLy are "cool" as you posted in your lies. Your links show me arguing the rules of the board. I could care less who the poster is, as indicated in the case of me defending posting of Manali. BEVERLY, DCTECH and Manali postings did not violate current rules of the board. Something you cannot understand because your emotions and dislikes get in the way of reason 4u..
Thats right. CASE CLOSED AS YOU DID NOT COME UP WITH EVEN 1 PEICE of evidence to support your lies. DITTO AGAIN AND AGAIN
>>> Mess… I mean, Miss 4now. It’s a matter of opinion. I did my part, you did yours complete with your ‘denying’ and ‘twisting’ ways.
You are the only mess here Mr. RN. Maybe finally you are seeing the real deal..and understand that it really is a matter of opinion most of the time. The world according to RN. Dude you are the only one in denial and playing the twister game here. Right now you are looking so contorted , I dont know how you are going to manage to stand up from your position.
Oh boy.. Now RN.. you are adding another Lie to the already outrageous lies above that you manifested. Please provide the link/proof from your crystal ball to support where I disclosed that little tidbit about Beverly and DCTECH.
You have showed your true colors. (no pun intended) I havent changed. Not in my writings or in what I stand for and/or against. This is about who you dont like/or who does not support your view of things, or illegal/undocumented immigration. You attacked Beverly because she was against illegal immigration. You attack DCTECH because he spoke badly of fillipinos. GOT 2 words 4u. Public forum. A public forum with current rules that allows the type of speech that they both wrote. The same forum that allows Manali to post his threads that disturb so many. What irks you is that there is nothing you can do about it unless the game rules change.
So in addition to sounding stupid.. you are also writing stupidly. Somewhere in your oxygen deprived brain you will have to discern that popularity and respect are not the same thing. You speak about Beverly and DCTECH because they were not popular etc. and you spoke about Beverly and how I stood in my path of standing up for her . RN's reasoning... because everybody here wanted her gone that it must have been the right thing. same with DCTECH. Well here is something for you to read and ponder.
>>> Haha! You’re so funny even when you’re throwing insults. One phrase covers all: PINK MESS!
Oh brother, I should have known that the Robert Frost poem would have gone over your head about the meaning. your response to me on it is some stupid illegal crayola cra pola?
Let me explain. The road less traveled is about members like yourself of the board wishing to ban certain members that they do not like and/or consider annoying to them. YOU RN, continue to spew the propaganda that 4now is wrong to take the position of the road less traveled because the majority on the board seem to follow the worn path. Beverly, DCTECh, Manali have not broken the current rules I havent had a chance to look at WUSC posts yet, but I suspect he hasnt broken the rules yet either, because he is still here. But you are not man enough to take the stand to defend them... for fear of losing popularity on the board. You want to make the rules up as you go along and not abide by the ones already in place. No wonder you can relate to the illegals sneaking into the country and making their own rules. Since you cant have these few members outed for not breaking the rules, you loosely invent..."disruptive poster" title/atmosphere to try to start the tidal wave that will take them out.
Just Plain sad.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: 4now,
Add to del.icio.us
I will answer that 4u.. NOTHING.
