She Will!

Yea but like most Latinos, she will get fired or knocked up within a few weeks. They are all the same.

quote:

It's a given she will. The radicals have taken over and the more different the nominee the more likely to be approved by the idiots in office. The selling out of our country has begun.

Hardly radical. Her record isn't one of extreme leftism. And she's one of 9 so it won't always go her way. Personally I think having some diversity on the Supreme Court is a good thing. After all, America isn't just made up of white men only.

quote:

Originally posted by Brit4064:

quote:

It's a given she will. The radicals have taken over and the more different the nominee the more likely to be approved by the idiots in office. The selling out of our country has begun.

Hardly radical. Her record isn't one of extreme leftism. And she's one of 9 so it won't always go her way. Personally I think having some diversity on the Supreme Court is a good thing. After all, America isn't just made up of white men only.

TRUE!!! Unfortunately The System appears To have Chosen Those Within Color, Race, Belief That many disapprove! Is Those That Do not play That card That Receive the gold star!!! GAMES!!!

I Am In one of the last Commonwealths Left Whereas Normal Rules tend To Not exist. My Demeanor!

som aint't racist lol see he loves us all on this site

quote:

Originally posted by Brit4064:
And you're not racist at all eh SoM?

quote:

Originally posted by Brit4064:

quote:

It's a given she will. The radicals have taken over and the more different the nominee the more likely to be approved by the idiots in office. The selling out of our country has begun.

Hardly radical. Her record isn't one of extreme leftism. And she's one of 9 so it won't always go her way. Personally I think having some diversity on the Supreme Court is a good thing. After all, America isn't just made up of white men only.

MIR, I have to disagree, She is a radical. By the mere mention that her being hispanic gives her an edge is racist by definition. Not limited to words but evidenced by deeds as well with her membership in la raza. The latino version of the KKK minus the hoods and nooses.

Brit, Diversity is not a qualification requirement for SCOTUS. With there being nine justices one wayward non-constitutionally motivated vote will have huge implications. Her 80% failure rate as indicated by the number of her decisions overturned is an unmistakable testament of her incompetence. She has no business on the bench at all. If anything, an impediment to justice. Clearly she was a mistake and an unqualified affirmative action appointment from day one.

I think the Supreme Court should reflect the reality of the USA today. Not some mythological ideal from the 1950s, all white, middle-aged men, married with 2.4 kids etc. Wake up davdah, there's a whole world out there.

quote:

Originally posted by Brit4064:
I think the Supreme Court should reflect the reality of the USA today. Not some mythological ideal from the 1950s, all white, middle-aged men, married with 2.4 kids etc. Wake up davdah, there's a whole world out there.

White men are supreme masters you despicable low life.

quote:

Originally posted by Brit4064:
I think the Supreme Court should reflect the reality of the USA today. Not some mythological ideal from the 1950s, all white, middle-aged men, married with 2.4 kids etc. Wake up davdah, there's a whole world out there.

Show me where it says the supreme court should reflect some reality? What reality is that. The one based on race? A racists argument if there was one.

Re-read what the job of the court is. Something about constitutional interpretation if I'm not mistaken. Show me this .4 kid. See how many kids those justices actually have.

I don't have a problem with the race or gender of a nominee for the Supreme Court. If that person is the most qualified of all the candidates and will uphold the Constitution, then so be it. But, I don't think someone should be appointed merely to diversify the Supreme Court. This person will hold one of the highest jobs in this country and will serve for life. It is too important a job to appoint someone just to make it another 'first' for this country. Just my take on it.

quote:

Originally posted by SonofMichael:

quote:

Originally posted by Brit4064:
I think the Supreme Court should reflect the reality of the USA today. Not some mythological ideal from the 1950s, all white, middle-aged men, married with 2.4 kids etc. Wake up davdah, there's a whole world out there.

White men are supreme masters you despicable low life.

No their not ...and idiots come in all colors! As evidenced here.

quote:

Originally posted by ProudUSC:
I don't have a problem with the race or gender of a nominee for the Supreme Court. If that person is the most qualified of all the candidates and will uphold the Constitution, then so be it. But, I don't think someone should be appointed merely to diversify the Supreme Court. This person will hold one of the highest jobs in this country and will serve for life. It is too important a job to appoint someone just to make it another 'first' for this country. Just my take on it.

...and she is not appointed because she is latina. She is appointed because of her extensive record. We voted for change and that is change!!

You don't think this was intentional given that just prior to her nomination there was talk of there needing to be some hispanic representation on the court? Or more women for that matter?

Seems like a strange coincidence to me



"With Judge Sonia Sotomayor already facing questions over her 60 percent reversal rate, the Supreme Court could dump another problem into her lap next month if, as many legal analysts predict, the court overturns one of her rulings upholding a race-based employment decision.

Three of the five majority opinions written by Judge Sotomayor for the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals and reviewed by the Supreme Court were reversed, providing a potent line of attack raised by opponents Tuesday after President Obama announced he will nominate the 54-year-old Hispanic woman to the high court. "

quote:

Originally posted by Kollerkrot:

quote:

Originally posted by ProudUSC:
I don't have a problem with the race or gender of a nominee for the Supreme Court. If that person is the most qualified of all the candidates and will uphold the Constitution, then so be it. But, I don't think someone should be appointed merely to diversify the Supreme Court. This person will hold one of the highest jobs in this country and will serve for life. It is too important a job to appoint someone just to make it another 'first' for this country. Just my take on it.

...and she is not appointed because she is latina. She is appointed because of her extensive record. We voted for change and that is change!!

I hope so. I'm not qualified to judge her. That is up to the Senate.

quote:

Originally posted by davdah:

quote:

Originally posted by Brit4064:

quote:

It's a given she will. The radicals have taken over and the more different the nominee the more likely to be approved by the idiots in office. The selling out of our country has begun.

Hardly radical. Her record isn't one of extreme leftism. And she's one of 9 so it won't always go her way. Personally I think having some diversity on the Supreme Court is a good thing. After all, America isn't just made up of white men only.

MIR, I have to disagree, She is a radical. By the mere mention that her being hispanic gives her an edge is racist by definition. Not limited to words but evidenced by deeds as well with her membership in la raza. The latino version of the KKK minus the hoods and nooses.

Brit, Diversity is not a qualification requirement for SCOTUS. With there being nine justices one wayward non-constitutionally motivated vote will have huge implications. Her 80% failure rate as indicated by the number of her decisions overturned is an unmistakable testament of her incompetence. She has no business on the bench at all. If anything, an impediment to justice. Clearly she was a mistake and an unqualified affirmative action appointment from day one.

Davdah,
I Agree!! You must have beaten me to LOL.

One other note. This is actually Bush's fault. He made her a judge to begin with. I think we know why. An appeasement and bribe to the la raza crowd and their dim witted supporters and constituency. Didn't work though. The free loader class want nothing to do with anything that smacks of individual effort. If it isn't a hand out or an entitlement it's assumed racist if not achieved.

Like her last ruling. Where she said the fire fighters test was biased because the minorities who took it didn't fair well. Maybe it's because the minorities who took it didn't know their stuff. I would rather be labeled hateful and at the same time have some assurance the fire fighter rescuing me or my family knows what they are doing.

What is racist is having an affirmative action program to begin with. It says you can not do it on your own. You can't measure up to the same standards as the majority. You're just dumb and therefor require the help and assistance of those that look out for you, the democrats. Those are the true racists who have their boot on your neck.