quote:

Who are you talking to?

And who were you talking to?

quote:

I would long ago read your LOOONG posts and pondered on them, and responded if not your name calling..

This statement proves that you are indeed a liar - because earlier you said you didn't read copy-pasted posts for not having time , for being busy running your business (to which I responded asking you not to post multitude of off-topic replies to threads [such as your personal "deficit" of time and etc.] into the discussions of thread).

It appears now that you will do anything and say any lie imaginable - only to distract attention of readers from the subject or someone's replies to it when you don't like it.

I cannot agree that the Democrats are the lesser of two evils. The Democrats maintain a core belief that increasing the size of government if fundamental to social success. Indeed their response after Katrina was that "G. Bush and his tax cuts were responsible".

In reality goverment bureacracy is at the root of the major issues and dilemas that plague our country. 09/11 happened because the CIA, FBI, INS and local police were not able to communicate to each other because of internal protocols. It was disturbing to watch those agencies defend themselves after the catastrophy. It was painfully apparant that they thought not communicating outside their agency was normal.

Katrina was a natural disaster. The lack of response to the disaster was again a rellection of the inability of goverment bureacracy to address an issue. Those in charge of the FEMA trailers think it makes perfect sense to have them sit unused in the desert so that the "paperwork can be processed correctly".

Democrats are NOT the solution

It will not be possible to run infinite number of times on 9/11.

Other issues gradually emerge to the top.
We already see it.

The length of Republican control of the House will depend not only on the quality of their campaign-strategy machine, but also on their ability to keep satisfied the constituency which is large enough to provide majority of seats in the Congress.

Some day Democrats will inevitably take back the House (just as Republicans will thereafter do the same), but that day is not on the horizon yet.

And until Democrats don't take back the control of the House there will be no Comprehensive Immigration Reform enacted (never the kind President Bush proposed) , but thereafter Democrats will force nothing short of Full Amnesty.

Impenetrable, or should you read I'mpenetrable.

You're paranoid to say the least.
I'm very saddened at the turn of the events. Sorry to see you this way.
For you, it's all about you. You think every response aims at doing something to you. That's paranoia.
I told you already once you are just a virtual person I couldn't care less about.

I couldn't care less if you call me "paranoid" or whatever else you wish, it just goes to show that you will not cease to resort to off-topic demagoguery and personal attacks/character assasination in lieu of intelligent, plausible and coherent argument on merits.

Which further goes to show that you have nothing really to counter the points I make.

But your goal is to fight and frustrate me, is that right?
Well I am not in a mood to fight with you or counter your points.

There is something about your picture that really turns me on IP

quote:

But your goal is to fight and frustrate me, is that right?

In fact my goal is to have an honest, intelligent and plausible discussion on any of the topics I participate in, but it turns out to be contrary to your intentions, hence you resort to never stopping demagoguery and character assasination (which is fine with me, it's your Free Speech right to post whatever you wish, but I simply state my opinion on it as well and maintain that you resort to such tactics since you have nothing to counter the points I make).

Character assassination? My oh my!
You assassinated your own character by throwing insults and name calling left and right, not me.

So I guess, that's my picture...
It is not a picture of my person though as it isn't Impenetrable's.
Although, IMpenetrable seems to think S.Dali speaks through him.

Maybe I'll change the picture to my face (should appear shortly).
I wonder what kind of responses I will start getting then.

I like this picture too it is pretty. The other one was more erotic though.

Thank you. This is me, in my own visage.

Shall I also give away my phone number?

[quote]Character assassination? My oh my!
You assassinated your own character by throwing insults and name calling left and right, not me.

So I guess, that's my picture...
It is not a picture of my person though as it isn't Impenetrable's.
Although, IMpenetrable seems to think S.Dali speaks through him.
[quote]

Same old.. demagoguery and character assasination - that's all they taught you..

Have anything to say on topic?

quote:

Originally posted by moemoe:
Republicans believe people are incredibly tolerant and forgive any and every thing. I guess its time we prove them wrong. call it apathy or may be time to teach them a lesson ... november will bring good news ... hopefully

In a lot of ways Republicans are right when you look at the incumbancy rate each and every election. With only a few exceptions, and the last one being in 1994 with all those Democratic scandals, people wanted change and thus how the Republicans came into power. But just like the Democrats who controlled both the House and Senate for eons, the party also fell prey to the same old issues that still plague the opposition. It has been said that Republicans in Congress are at their best when they are the opposition, not the majority.

Have anything to say on topic? Cool

Cool, right?
Well, I just opened an online store today. Tomorrow another one and within a week or two another one. Than in January two more.
Its not like I'm sitting on my butt and speculate on what ifs and what if nots. I have a life.

That's wonderful (though off-topic) !

I just find it odd that in average you had only 1,3 (one point three) posts less [per day] than me , and I certainly am the one sitting on my butt and speculating on "what ifs and what if nots"

What? And how did you calculate that?
I posted twice today, this post included. I didnt count yours but there were probably more than 10.

You mean you don't know how to calculate the average numbers of posts ?

In fact your average is ~4.9 per day vs. ~6.2 by me.

Where did you get my average from?
I may ask...

Aren't you busy with your life?
Why even care to ask?
But since you do (and I know you are kidding) , then here is the 4th grade (elementary school) math formula:

Total number of your posts divided by the number of days passed since you registered will equal to average number of posts you left here per day.

Now, would you finally say something on topic?

My opinion (reflected under this thread, along with underlying reason pointing to such conclusion) is that Republicans most likely will maintain control of the Senate, and most certainly will keep the House.

I think YOU are kidding.
What about Antifascist and other identities. I bet ya forgot those to take into account?

On topic- I think Dems will win both Houses hand over fist and beat Cons once and for all.