quote:
Originally posted by 4now:
quote:
I'm not going to do the inline color texting thing here. Back to the matter that started this thread. Do you think it was okay for Beverly to invite 'mischief' to this forum by posting what she did on the Alipac forum? It was a clear invitation to cause disruption to a place where many immigrants come to ask questions. I, for one, am not willing to give this forum over to militants. That is my prime beef! lol
God Bless America and everyone else!
Militants? Come on Proud. Is Beverly supposed to be a Blank Panther now. lol Theres only one panther here I will have you know.
THINL PINK!Ok the rest of this not just directed at proud , and is a general statement to all that supported the request to Ban Beverly about a statement from another site about mischeif.
We have no control over what people do on other sites. Explora and others here are interpreting what mischief is. Do you not call it mischeif what Explora and babyeh and WKnapp did Dec last part of December? (The time period of this message)?
Did you forget about that little tyrade when Explora seemed to have a nervous breakdown and posts all those threads on the board? That looked pretty mischeivous to me and inconsiderate to the board's posters and the board.
I mean it looked like a scene from wizard of Oz. "Ill get you my pretty! Im melting"
Again.. I bring it up because you are applying two standards to two different people, and also not against some of your own mischevous behaviors.
Iperson expressed in a post that pms behind the scenes set the standards for some of the baiting. Do you all not recall when Some of you took it upon yourselves for a little mischief and posted chicken questions all weekend to move the posts by Beverly down. Noble as it was, It was mischief as defined. In your opinions it was necessary. But that does not excuse it from being what it is. It doesnt matter that you didnt post it on the board that you were doing it. Pms behind the scenes to not be detected. is this really any different.. Be honest with yourselves. Tell me how this is different. All happened in same timeframe.
Then you have iperson who felt attacked and gave sympathy to Beverly, then back and forth not feeling on the inside , now feeling back on the inside. Oh brother.
come on now. This is much adu about nothing as I didnt see any new posters come on ILw to Beverly's defense on those given dates or after in December.
This is my big problem with all of this hoopla about this remark on anohter site. I do not perceive it as anything that some of you have not done in that same period. and the evidence stands for itself within this site. Should I pull up the threads again and rehash ?
if none of you have been guilty of the above referenced mischeif.. pleae raise your hands.
So lets concentrate on issues that are going to make ILW appear racist and try to get Sam to add some inappropriate words to the foul language indicator. Racist language and ethnic slurring are unacceptable of any nature whether it be referecing a Polish, Arab or any other person of color.
____________
FerNow,
"Think Pink." jajajajaj Does the color 'pink' ring a bell? Do you have any pink flamingos? Everybody knows what the color pink is all about and you wear it with pride!! Proud of ya! jajajajaja I know your true colors!! jajajajaja
Mischief, drive and having the audacity to name whom she wished to attack. Actions on the board proved INTENT to disrupt the functions of what this board is.
"The proof is in the pudding."Don't jump from A all the way over to Z and skip everything in between that everybody has already seen, Pinky Man. It is so very obvious all that you leave out when you speak.
Beverly's michichieviousness turned out to be very malicious. There wasn't only a post she made, there was real visible provable ACTION on her part proving there was INTENT. Recently she used the word DESTROY.
If somebody was having a nervous breakdown that's a silly choice of words to use, I think you're an example of a nuclear plant about three minutes away from meltdown.
"Ill get you my pretty! Im melting" Are those the words you send to your significant other?
Don't leave out what somebody's INTENT results in. There are repercussions of actions don't you know? Do you think people are just going to sit back and do nothing and let somebody with bad intent, such as Beverly, run over everybody on the board? We are going to sit back and say nothing or do nothing?
You must've missed all your physics classes about reactions.
"Chicken Weekend." Beverly posted about chickens so much that it drew a lot of public interest so we it became what is known as "chicken weekend."
What was said in a private message hasn't nothing to do with it. That's none of your business 4now. Oh, "We forgot to tell you."
iperson said she wished she'd never spoken to Beverly. We saw where Beverly made a racial comment that the Polish/Irish were racist.
Get over it forever, let your prosecution rest. You never want to say Beverly has done anything. Now this is mentioned you'll pop up with a little comment that you don't condone certain actions done by this Beverly but geez FerNow, it's unavoidable what Beverly's intent was and her actions and the end result.
Much ado about nothing. It's always 'nothing' when you defend Beverly. Sorry that not everybody agrees with you and your analogies are all wrong.
I guess there weren't any new posters that wanted to come to her defense. If they didn't want to defend her then that was their perogative. Sorry you didn't find the support to defend Beverly in this respect. If it wasn't there then it wasn't there. Soooorrrrrryyyy.
Every action is going to have a reaction.
I don't know if you are a legal assistant, paralegal, surely not an aspiring attorney (too many spelling errors 4that). All this 'raise your hands b.s.' trying to sound so legal, jajajajaja.
Get real. We didn't come onto this board with the same INTENT as Beverly. Our actions were only REACTIONS to what she came on board and started.
It's not just about a 'remark.' ACTION SPEAKS LOUDER THAN WORDS. She proved her intent by her actions. Simple to see that even a person that needs glasses should be able to see it.
If you want to pull up threads and copy posts please open a new thread for them and/or give us a link. Don't waste half of one screen on Sam's thread (like you did with the Wikipedia) taking up space.
Do that for Sam, not us. I usually don't like to quote so much because of the space it takes but doing that on this reply. I can make reference to the comment and it's date which I normally try to do.
We don't care what you pull up and you don't have to ask us. If you want to do it then go ahead. You won't be fair and balanced because there's too many of Beverly's that you'll have to pull up. If you're fair but you will be 'selective' in what you copy over.
None of us are guility of planning and inviting mischief with the intent carried out such as Beverly did FIRST. No hands raised my little OP trying to play like he's a judge. jajajajaja
There's way too much evidence on Beverly for you to defend her 4whatever.
Add to del.icio.us
Stop talking stupid nonsense. It does not become you. i am sure you are not really that far gone .
Just to make a point for self gratification.
