Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
© 1995-
Immigration LLC.

  • Article: How the Democratic Party Platform Addresses Immigration. By Joshua Breisblatt

    How the Democratic Party Platform Addresses Immigration



    In contrast to the Republican Party Platform on immigration released last week, which was generally negative on immigration and lacked any practical ideas for reforming U.S. immigration, the recently released Democratic Party Platform discusses immigration as a positive for America and identifies specific policy fixes to help update our outdated immigration system. As the platform notes, “immigration is not just a problem to be solved, it is a defining aspect of the American character and our shared history.”

    The platform describes how the current immigration system is separating families and failing to incorporate undocumented immigrants into our society. It also acknowledges that there is a need to create a path to citizenship for those currently in the U.S. without status.

    The platform also describes fixing the immigration visa backlog in an effort to reunite families. Specifically the platform notes, the “immigration bureaucracy is full of backlogs that result in U.S. citizens waiting for decades to be reunited with family members, and green card holders waiting for years to be reunited with their spouses and minor children.”

    It also discusses repealing the three and ten-year and permanent bars which force individuals “in mixed status families into the heartbreaking dilemma of either pursuing a green card by leaving the country and their loved ones behind, or remaining in the shadows.”

    Additionally, as part of reshaping the current immigration system, the platform commits to protecting DACA, and fighting to implement DAPA, as well as other executive actions on immigration.

    On immigration enforcement the platform states it must be “humane and consistent with our values” and that includes ending immigration raids, noting they “unnecessarily sow fear in immigrant communities.”

    It also describes a roll back of detention and acknowledges the problems with privately-run detention facilities. The platform explicitly states it will “fight” to end all contracts, at the federal, state and municipal level, with private detention centers and for-profit prisons. It also prescribes a way to end family detention noting that “we will ensure humane alternatives for those who pose no public threat.”

    Lastly, on refugee policy and violence in Central America, the platform recognizes the importance of addressing root causes and the importance of giving those individuals due process. The platform specifically states, for the first time ever, that unaccompanied children in immigration court should be appointed counsel at the government’s expense. The platform also lists specific ways the government should protect Central American refugees by “strengthening in-country and third-country processing, expanding the use of humanitarian parole, and granting Temporary Protected Status.”

    When contrasting the Republican and Democratic platforms it appears the two political parties could not be further apart on immigration. It’s clear after reading them that the parties view the role of immigrants in American society quite differently and each perspective is reflected in their solutions for changing it.

    Photo by Jim Hutchinson.

    This post originally appeared on Immigration Impact. Reprinted with permission.

    About The Author

    Joshua Breisblatt is a Policy Analyst at the American Immigration Council. Prior to joining the Council he worked at the National Immigration Forum for over four years where he was Manager of Advocacy and Policy. In that role, Josh was the Forum’s main point of contact with U.S. government agencies and the U.S. Congress. He also specialized in border issues, including enforcement, civil rights, oversight of Customs and Border Protection, and trade and commerce at U.S. ports of entry. Josh earned his J.D. from The George Washington University School Law and his B.S. from Arizona State University. Prior to attending law school, he worked for Former Congressman Harry Mitchell from Arizona.

    The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.

    Comments 1 Comment
    1. Nolan Rappaport's Avatar
      Nolan Rappaport -
      Unfortunately, except for a few executive discretion items that are being challenged in court, those objectives require the enactment of an immigration reform bill, and the Democratic Party Platform fails to provide a way to move such a bill through Congress. I am tired of hearing immigration advocates and politicians promise reforms that aren't possible. It's getting very depressing.

      I can suggest a different approach that could work, but it would require serious compromise with the republicans, another thing the Democratic Party Platform neglects. See my article, "It is time to try a different approach to comprehensive immigration reform" (May 2, 2014),
      http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?3...t-approach-to- comprehensive-immigration-reform-By-Nolan-Rappaport
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: