Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE





The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

  • Article: Senate Hearing Shows Deferred Action Programs are Beneficial to Social Security. By Mark Noferi

    Senate Hearing Shows Deferred Action Programs are Beneficial to Social Security

    by


    6280517815_e5d397bfd5_b (1)

    The Senate Homeland Security committee on Wednesday held its first hearing about President Obama’s immigration executive actions. The hearing and the witnesses testifying focused on the “implications and unanswered questions” about the deportation relief offered to some undocumented immigrants included in the president’s actions.

    First, the Social Security Administration’s chief actuary, Stephen C. Goss, provided testimony estimating the impact of President Obama’s actions on the U.S. economy and Social Security trust fund. Goss estimated that due to deferred action, U.S. gross domestic product would increase by 0.15 percent by 2024 and 0.22 percent by 2050. Additionally, by 2024, 925,000 additional workers will be paying payroll taxes. This increase comes from bringing undocumented workers out of the shadows so they can fully pay taxes, and reducing deportations.

    Goss’ testimony adds to recent data that demonstrates the economic benefits from the Administration’s deferred action program—reduced deficits, increased payroll tax revenues, and increased wages, for U.S.-born workers as well. Goss stressed, though, the “limited nature” of the economic benefits of deferred action compared to comprehensive immigration reform such as the 2013 Senate legislation. Deferred action would only provide about one-third of the current unauthorized population the opportunity to apply for work authorization, and only a “very limited increase” in legal permanent residents entering the country.

    As to the Social Security trust fund, Goss stressed how immigration would positively impact it. Without net immigration of 1 million a year, negative effects on the finances of Social Security and Medicare “would be much more severe.” (Immigrants are generally younger, and have a higher birth rate, than U.S.-born.) The impacts of deferred action would be a “small positive for the next 75 years,” reducing the current Social Security deficit by 0.01 percent of payroll. This is due to “providing legal work authorization to many younger children and their parents in the current population, who will pay additional taxes for several decades,” Goss said.

    Senators also raised questions as to USCIS’ processing of deferred action applications. A former USCIS deputy ombudsman raised the possibility of “bottlenecks” from processing extra applications. However, former INS General Counsel Bo Cooper testified that “DHS has the tools and capacity to handle implementation of these programs from a logistical, financial, and enforcement perspective.” DHS now is operating with the “considerable advantage” of having implemented DACA, which gives it a model on which to base its current planning. And as the “new and expanded programs are of course broader” than DACA, Cooper noted that immigration agencies are designed to have “flexibility to scale to evolving caseloads and demands.” USCIS has secured a central processing location site and plans to hire 700 permanent employees and additional contractors.

    The first of the president’s executive actions are set to begin in a few short weeks. Witnesses at the Senate hearing provided ample evidence that USCIS will be ready and able to implement the programs, which will result in a significant boost to America’ Social Security system.

    Photo by 401(k) 2012.

    This post originally appeared on Immigration Impact. Reprinted with permission.


    About The Author

    Mark Noferi

    Mark Noferi teaches a Civil Rights and Immigration seminar at Brooklyn Law School, as well as legal writing. Professor Noferi's research interests focus on immigrants' rights, and criminal, constitutional and administrative law. He recently published on the right to counsel for immigration detainees (http://works.bepress.com/mnoferi/3/), and previously on due process limits on conspiracy liability. He also chairs a subcommittee of the New York City Bar studying immigration detention, which is actively advocating Congress for appointed counsel and reduced detention in immigration proceedings. Their materials are available at http://www.nycbar.org/immigration-a-nationality-law.


    The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: