Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE





The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

  • Article: How Thousands of U.S. Citizen Children Are Impacted by Removal of Parents. By Amy Grenier

    How Thousands of U.S. Citizen Children Are Impacted by Removal of Parents

    by


    4197733335_28518e152e_o


    While the President’s recent executive actions will help some parents of U.S. citizens, current border removal policies continue to separate U.S. citizen children from their parents, according to a new report by Human Rights Watch. Using data obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the authors calculated that 15 percent (or 101,900) of migrants removed at the border between October 1, 2010 and September 30, 2012 were parents of a U.S. citizen child. The report estimates that as many as 202,000 American children were separated from a parent through border removals. The study thus highlights the tension between the government’s border enforcement strategies and the objective of keeping families together.

    According to the report, many of these parents were removed under summary procedures that continue at the border today. The vast majority were removed under either “expedited removal” or “reinstatement of removal.” These two procedures allow immigration officers to serve as both prosecutor and judge – often investigating, charging, and making a decision to deport within the course of one day. The rapidity of these decisions means that officers often fail to take into account a person’s eligibility to apply for lawful status, or whether he or she has long-standing ties to the United States, which could include U.S. citizen children. Furthermore, both of these procedures happen so quickly the immigrant rarely has the opportunity to consult an attorney, and there is rarely any judicial oversight over their deportation. Indeed, fewer than 10 percent of the parents of U.S. citizen children apprehended by Customs and Border Protection at the border during 2011 and 2012 were allowed a hearing before a judge.

    “Reinstatement of removal” applies to noncitizens who return illegally to the United States after being previously deported, regardless of their current situation. The Human Rights Watch report found that parents of U.S. citizen children were 1.77 times more likely than non-parents to be removed under “reinstatement of removal.” Given the devastation of family separation, it is not surprising that parents of U.S. citizens are attempting to rejoin children in the United States.

    Human Rights Watch also found that, during the time period studied, more than 32,000 parents of U.S. citizen children were referred for prosecution for either illegal entry or re-entry. This number makes up one in five of all immigrants charged with illegal entry or re-entry, a criminal charge that further limits the possibility of relief from removal. Taken together, this data suggests that current removal policies have a significant negative impact on U.S. citizen children, which so far is unmitigated by either executive action or legislative reform.

    Photo by Andre Delhaye.

    This post originally appeared on Immigration Impact. Reprinted with permission


    About The Author

    Amy Grenier Amy Grenier is the Administrative and Research Assistant at the Immigration Policy Center. Amy has a B.A. in History from Hollins University and an M.A. in Migration Studies from the University of Sussex, where she wrote her thesis on federalism, immigration, and state level activism in the United States. She also studied briefly at Ho Chi Minh International University, where a course on the Vietnamese diaspora piqued her interest in immigrant communities in the United States. Previously, she has interned for the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, served as a volunteer coordinator for a refugee charity in the United Kingdom, and worked as a legal secretary for a regulatory law firm. Follow her on Twitter @argrenier.


    The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: