Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE





The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

  • Article: Lipstick on a Pig in Immigrant Investing by Joseph Whalen

    Lipstick on a Pig in Immigrant Investing

    by Joseph Whalen

    “Lipstick on a pig” is a reference to a futile effort to dress something up to appear to be more than it really is. This is an inherent danger in the realm of EB-5 investment offerings. Many investment opportunities are simply unsuitable for EB-5 purposes and no amount of window dressing will make it any more suitable. This unsuitability may be for a variety of reasons. The main flaw is the likely failure to create enough jobs for the investors. Some offerings may involve seasonal, transient, or temporary job creation. Some may be in businesses that normally rely almost exclusively on a part time workforce.

    We have recently seen cases being denied due to “overcapitalization” that is, the start-up or troubled business, or existing business to be expanded or restructured does not actually require the full minimum EB-5 investment thereby creating excessive “reserves” or in other words the investors’ money is not “at risk” in a legitimate effort to create (or preserve) jobs and might actually be locked up in certificates of deposit, stocks, or bonds in addition to, or instead of, “on-hand” or even just sitting in a bank account rather than being put to use to create jobs for qualified U.S. workers. Some offerings seek too many investors for the number of jobs being created, while others offer zero buffer on the number of jobs that MIGHT be created in a best case scenario. Some EB-5 offerings have absolutely no other investors involved. That is, no domestic investors and/or the developer and/or Regional Center have absolutely no “skin in the game”. They have so little confidence in their own offering that they fail to partake in the “promised” success of that project.

    Some small percentage of potential development projects or structured offerings are likely to involve fraud. That is a strong impetus to be sure to conduct proper due diligence. If you as the EB-5 investor or as a Regional Center are incapable of conducting such due diligence on your own then, hire someone to do it for you, it is money well spent. Whether you are the poytential EB-5 investor, a dealer-broker, or perhaps a Regional Center lloking to partner with a developer, I can help you examine the EB-5 suitability aspect of an investment vehicle.

    E-mail the author at: joseph.whalen774@gmail.com


    About The Author

    Joseph P. Whalen is not an attorney. He is a former government employee who is familiar with the INA. His education is in Anthroplogy with a concentration in Archaeology and has both a BA (from SUNY Buffalo) and an MA (from San Francisco State University) in Anthroplogogy. He previously worked as an Archaeologist for the U.S. Forest Service before becoming an Adjudicator with INS which became USCIS.


    The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: