Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE





The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

  • Article: Will Photo-Matching Tool Be E-Verify's Answer to Document Theft? by Ann Cun

    Will Photo-Matching Tool Be E-Verify's Answer to Document Theft?

    by Ann Cun

    What else can be written about E-Verify that has not already been written? For anyone following the latest debates on immigration reform, much of the bill discusses E-Verify. During our E-Verify CIR webinar in early June, one of our attendees posed an interesting question, paraphrased here: Wouldn’t the photo-matching tool that currently exists in the E-Verify System curb document theft?

    In other words, could the photo-matching tool be E-Verify’s answer to document theft? The answer depends on a variety of issues and contingencies. The question also presumes that identity theft can be solved by imposing a stringent work-eligibility verification system.

    Fake Documents vs. Valid Documents

    The E-Verify System processes its cases from both the Social Security and Department of Homeland Security databases. “Fake” documents with false numbers would receive a non-confirmation in the E-Verify System.

    Much of the challenge with document fraud though is the use of valid documents by somebody other than the owner of the documents, effectively producing “false positives” in the E-Verify System. In this scenario, a system that is designed to tell you if the document is valid would not be able to detect if the employee is the legal owner of the documents being presented.

    Photo-Matching in E-Verify

    Photo-matching is available in the E-Verify System when an employee presents any of these “List A” documents:

    • I-551 (Permanent Resident Card, aka “greencard”)
    • Form I-766 (Employment Authorization Document)
    • U.S. Passport
    • U.S. Passport Card

    In theory, the idea of photo-matching is relatively simple. For the employer (or employer representative), the photo that shows up on the computer screen during the E-Verify process should be the same photo on the List A document being presented to the employer.

    In practice though, employers have been confused by the process and may not be adhering strictly to the instructions above. If an employer (or employer representative) looks at the computer screen and compares that image to the actual employee, then the photo-matching tool would have been used incorrectly. What happens if the photo does not look like the employee? Do the employers confront the employee? Can you imagine the awkward conversations that have transpired? What happens if the photo is an older photo of the employee, who has since undergone significant changes in his/her appearance?

    Therein lays the challenge of the Photo-Matching Tool in E-Verify. If employers adhere strictly to the rule, than valid documents will “pass” the E-Verify system and indicate work authorization, even if documents do not belong to the employee. If employers do not adhere to the rules, than they may detect “imposters.” This latter method is not encouraged by USCIS.

    This is one of the reasons properly training staff members by experienced attorneys on using E-Verify can go a long way to avoiding the incorrect use of the system (in addition to awkward scenarios like described above).

    Driver’s Licenses as Part of Photo-Matching?

    It has yet to be seen how driver’s licenses will be incorporated into the Photo-Matching Tool, if at all. Currently, Mississippi and Florida are the only two states that are participating in the Records and Information from DMVs for E-Verify (RIDE).

    For employees presenting a List B document (identity document) for the Form I-9, the driver’s license information from those two states will be processed by E-Verify through those states’ motor vehicle agency databases to confirm the validity of the information. The photos from the driver’s licenses will not yet be part of the photo-matching tool.

    Verdict?

    So, to our readers: Knowing what you know about E-Verify and Photo-Matching, what is your consensus? Would the Photo-Matching Tool as we know it today curb identity theft? If so, why? Why not?

    An Even Bigger Question

    Clearly the bigger issue is how to manage 11 million individuals already in this country who do not have legal work authorization. For argument’s sake, let’s say that E-Verify can prevent 11 million individuals who are not authorized to work from working. Exactly what are we going to do with 11 million unemployed individuals in this country? ….
    Originally published by LawLogix Group Inc Reprinted with permission.


    About The Author

    Ann Cun is a U.S. based immigration attorney who has helped companies in the technology, science, business, sports, entertainment and arts fields secure complex work visas for their employees. With more than a decade of experience as a paralegal and attorney, Ms. Cun possesses a stellar record of success. Her legal expertise also includes conducting internal I-9 audits for companies and developing I-9 compliant strategies and solutions. She is a graduate of UCLA and UC Hastings School of Law and has been invited to speak by the Bar Association of San Francisco and the American Immigration Lawyers Association on U.S. immigration related topics, as well as other international conferences. Ms. Cun is a contributing author and currently serves as Counsel and Principal Editor for LawLogix Group.


    The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) alone and should not be imputed to ILW.COM.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: