Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE





The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

  • Article: EB-5 Perspective: First Quarter Review by H. Ronald Klasko

    EB-5 Perspective: First Quarter Review

    by H. Ronald Klasko

    This blog provides my perspective on the state of the EB-5 program based upon what we have seen in the first quarter of 2013.

    For prospective regional centers, the first quarter of 2013 has been more productive than the entirety of 2012.  This was both predicted and predictable.  For pending regional center applications, 2012 was almost a total void.  From February 2012, when USCIS announced that it was reevaluating all tenant occupancy cases, to the end of December 2012, when USCIS issued its final tenant occupancy policy, virtually all applications remained in limbo.  Applications pending 4 to 6 months as of February 2012 were pending 14 to 16 months by the time the calendar turned to the new year.

    However, since the start of the new year, the pace of I-924 adjudications has hastened.  We have received 3 new regional center approvals just within the last 3 weeks.  We have received 2 exemplar I-526 approvals in the last month.

    The bad news is that there are still many I-924s pending for more than a year.  We hope to see the number of approvals increasing significantly as these backlogged cases are adjudicated.

    It is still too early to analyze how USCIS is implementing its December 2012 tenant occupancy memorandum.  Many, if not most, of the RFEs that were responded to in 2012 relating to tenant occupancy issues still remain pending as we begin the second quarter of 2013.

    While I-924 adjudications have increased, I-526 adjudications for investors in regional centers have gone in the opposite direction.  The processing times have gone from 6 months to 8 months to 10 months to now, in many cases, 12 months.  It is difficult to say if this is a “robbing Peter to pay Paul” phenomenon (increasing resources on I-924 applications at the expense of I-526 applications), a result of the SEC investigation in Chicago and SEC reviews of many investment projects on the market or some other reason.  Certainly it is true that, with the indefinite delays in new regional center applications in 2012, far more projects were marketed through existing, “adopted” regional centers, meaning that the projects have never been reviewed by USCIS when adjudicators receive the I-526 petitions from the investors.

    From our experience, it appears that USCIS will take the longest period of time to adjudicate the first investors in a project.  Once a number of investors have been approved (which means that USCIS has evaluated the investment project on multiple occasions), remaining I-526 petitions generally go to the same group of examiners and generally receive much faster processing.  However, for speed of processing times, it appears that direct EB-5s are presently the quickest.

    Finally, there is the backdrop of the impending move of the EB-5 unit to Washington.  Presumably, there is substantial pressure to eliminate a significant portion of the backlog before the files are transferred to a new unit.  There is also the impact of the recent appointment of Dan Renaud as the Acting Chief of the Immigrant Investor Program.  Mr. Renaud has an exemplary background in overseeing efficient petition processing in other areas of USCIS, and we hope he will bring those same talents to EB-5.

    We hope that some of the favorable trends that we have seen in the first quarter of 2013 will continue in the second quarter and that some of the lingering problems will be resolved in a manner that bodes well for the success of the EB-5 program.


    About The Author

    H. Ronald Klasko is recognized by businesses, universities, hospitals, scholars, investors and other lawyers as one of the country’s leading immigration lawyers. A founding member of Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP and its Managing Partner, he has practiced immigration law exclusively over three decades. Under his leadership, the firm was chosen with five other firms by Chambers Global in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 as the top U.S. business, hospital and university immigration law firm. Ron, himself, was named as the world’s most respected corporate immigration lawyer (The International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers 2007 and 2008) and one of the country’s top immigration lawyers by clients and other immigration lawyers who said he is “revered for coming up with unique arguments that can save a client” (Chambers Global). A former National President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), Ron served as General Counsel of that organization for three Presidents and has been a member of its Board of Governors since 1980. He has served as National Chair of AILA’s U.S. Department of Labor Liaison Committee and Business Immigration Committee, and he served as National Chair of that organization’s INS General Counsel Liaison Committee, Department of Labor Liaison Committee, and the National Task Forces on Labor Certifications, H-1 visas, L-1 visas and Employer Sanctions. He presently serves as Chair of the EB-5 Committee.


    The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) alone and should not be imputed to ILW.COM.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: