Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE





The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

  • Article: Immigration Reform: Battling Fear with Facts by Sheela Murthy et al.

    Immigration Reform: Battling Fear with Facts

    by Sheela Murthy et al.

    It's often said that the road to perdition is paved with good intentions. Given the political machinations surrounding immigration reform, some observers might be tempted to add a corollary: that even the best-intended legislation is no match for misinformed or deliberately tendentious debate.

    According to journalist Juan Williams, President Bush's attempt to pass comprehensive immigration reform, in 2007, was doomed by what he calls the "dagger" of an idea: that our southwestern border had become a literal walkover for illegal immigrants. [See Opinion: Dispensing with a New 'Dagger' Against Immigration Reform, by Juan Williams, The Hill, 18.Feb.2013.] That rhetorical dagger was blunted, Williams says, by "a record number of border patrol agents now in place, along with electronic surveillance and even walls to seal off the borders. Illegal border crossings are now so low that some estimate more people are leaving than arriving."

    Though immigration reform enjoys more bipartisan support than it did in 2007, a dwindling group of die-hard CIR opponents is aiming a new "dagger" at the latest reform effort, Williams says: the notion that "Immigrants, both legal and illegal, are 'Takers' not 'Makers.'" In other words, they claim the costs of immigration vastly outweigh the benefits; and that immigrants come here "looking for handouts." Williams forcefully refutes this view, citing a raft of economic studies that find precisely the opposite: "The factual reality is that the vast majority of immigrants - legal and illegal - contribute more to this country than they take in social services."

    According to Williams, economists and demographers have determined that:

    • Immigrants are helping to keep the Social Security trust fund solvent for the next wave of retirees, and will contribute $611 billion to Social Security coffers over the next 75 years.
    • Legal immigrants use social support programs like welfare, food stamps and Medicaid at the same rate - or less - than native-born Americans.
    • Immigrants get less in Social Security and Medicare benefits than their native-born American counterparts.
    • Immigration reform, including a path to citizenship for the 11 million undocumented currently living here, would increase U.S. GDP by $1.5 trillion over ten years.

    Meanwhile, over at The New Yorker, James Surowiecki takes the edge off another metaphorical dagger aimed at CIR: the fear that it will be "bad for American workers" and potentially harm the economy. [See Immigration Reform and the American Worker, by James Surowiecki, The New Yorker, 22.Feb.2013.] Surowiecki counters by drawing a straight line between immigration, innovation, and job creation, noting that immigrants are overrepresented in the ranks of entrepreneurs and patent holders here, and that "in 2011, for instance, three-quarters of the patents from the country's ten most prolific research universities had immigrants among their contributors."

    Surowiecki is quick to point out that low-skilled immigrant workers also benefit the U.S. economy because their skills are complementary - not competitive - with those of native-born American workers. Without foreign-born dishwashers and busboys, Surowiecki argues, fewer native-born Americans would have jobs as waiters and bartenders; a similar dynamic is present in the construction industry, he says.

    Both articles make excellent reading, and provide a healthy factual counterbalance to the misinformation that's still circulating about comprehensive immigration reform. Implicitly, they make a larger point: facts matter, and are indispensable to reasoned public decision-making. As in any public debate, good information is more than half the battle.

    Copyright 2013, MURTHY LAW FIRM. All Rights Reserved. Reprinted with permission.


    About The Author

    Attorneys from the Murthy Law Firm. Sheela Murthy is the founder of the Murthy Law Firm, which consists of approximately 85 full time attorneys, paralegals, and support staff, who provide excellent service in the area of U.S. Immigration Law to clients worldwide. The Murthy Law Firm handles cases ranging from Fortune 500 companies, mid-sized and small companies, to individuals who are undergoing the U.S. immigration process. A graduate of Harvard Law School with an LL.M degree and herself an immigrant, Attorney Murthy understands the complexities of immigration and empathizes with those faced with its challenges


    The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: