Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Article: The Supreme Court Heard a Major Case on DACA. Here’s What You Need to Know By Jorge Loweree

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  

  • Article: The Supreme Court Heard a Major Case on DACA. Here’s What You Need to Know By Jorge Loweree

    The Supreme Court Heard a Major Case on DACA. Here’s What You Need to Know.

    by


    The Supreme Court heard arguments on November 12 in three cases challenging President Trump’s attempted rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) initiative. The Court’s decision could have far-reaching consequences for DACA recipients and the limits of executive authority when it comes to immigration law and policy.

    President Obama created the DACA initiative in June 2012 to provide young unauthorized immigrants with protection from deportation and the ability to work lawfully in the United States in two-year renewable increments. All applicants were required to meet specific criteria related to age, education, and criminal history. Government data indicates that approximately 661,000 people are currently enrolled. President Trump terminated the program September 5, 2017.

    On Tuesday, the Supreme Court focused on one primary question: did the Trump administration provide an adequate explanation for why it ended DACA?

    Anytime the Executive Branch makes a major policy decision such as ending DACA, it must explain why and ensure that the reasoning is not “arbitrary and capricious.” The Trump administration needed to provide a reason why it was ending an initiative that hundreds of thousands of people had benefited from and relied upon.

    In two memos announcing the rescission, administration officials claimed DACA was an unconstitutional exercise of executive authority, and thus “illegal” from the start. Both memos failed to offer any policy justifications for the termination of the program. They instead pointed to a decision by the U.S. District Court in Brownsville, Texas barring a similar program known as Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) as proof that DACA was illegal.

    In response to several lawsuits, lower courts across the country issued injunctions against the rescission. This forced the government to continue accepting and adjudicating DACA requests from people who have DACA or those who participated in the past. These lawsuits then made their way to the Supreme Court.

    The Supreme Court focused on the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when it discussed whether the president’s decision to eliminate DACA is one that can be reviewed by federal courts and, if so, if it was lawful as implemented. The APA sets forth the standards governing the judicial review of decisions by executive branch agencies.

    The APA permits a federal court to review whether government action is “arbitrary or capricious,” or otherwise not in accord with the law. It thus provides a check on government decisions that do not have lawful, rational justifications.

    This review is particularly important when major policy decisions would significantly impact the lives of hundreds of thousands of people across the United States, like the attempted rescission of DACA. The APA contains an exception, however, for actions considered to be within an agency’s discretion.

    The administration argued that its decision falls within this exception and is therefore not reviewable by the courts. This is a curious position given its exclusive focus on the DAPA case in Texas as its justification for rescinding DACA.

    The respondents—the parties that initially challenged the DACA rescission—argued that the original memo rescinding the policy contained factual and legal errors, and that the reasoning provided for the decision was insufficient.

    Initial reports indicate that a majority of the justices appear ready to allow the administration to move forward with the rescission of the program.

    The consequences of simply revoking a program like DACA that people have come to rely on for many years are dire. The lives of hundreds of thousands of people who participated in the program over the last seven years would be thrown into disarray.

    It would then be up to Congress and the president to negotiate a permanent solution allowing DACA recipients to live and work in the United States without the constant threat of deportation. The House passed such a measure in June of this year.

    Photo by Maria Frausto.

    FILED UNDER: ,

    This post originally appeared on Immigration Impact. Reprinted with permission.


    About The Author

    Jorge Loweree is the Director of Policy at the American Immigration Council where he directs the Council's administrative and legislative advocacy and leads the Council's efforts to provide lawmakers, policymakers, advocates, and the general public with accurate and timely information about the role of immigrants in the United States. Previously, Jorge spent ten years in a variety of positions with the U.S. House of Representatives, most recently as Senior Counsel for Immigration Law and Policy, working on a wide range of enforcement and benefits issues. His experience includes the creation and implementation of novel and progressive programs to provide legal assistance to underserved populations, as well as extensive coalition-building and advocacy in pursuit of legal and regulatory reforms. Earlier in his career, Jorge provided direct legal representation with the Immigrant Legal Center of Boulder County and was an Equal Justice America Fellow at our Justice Campaign partner Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network (RMIAN). He grew up in Juarez, Mexico and is a fluent Spanish speaker. Jorge holds a J.D. from the University of Colorado Law School and Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics from the Saint Mary's University.


    The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.

      Posting comments is disabled.

    Home Page

    Immigration Daily

    Archives

    Processing times

    Immigration forms

    Discussion board

    Resources

    Blogs

    Twitter feed

    Immigrant Nation

    Attorney2Attorney

    CLE Workshops

    Immigration books

    Advertise on ILW

    EB-5

    移民日报

    About ILW.COM

    Connect to us

    Questions/Comments

    SUBSCRIBE

    Immigration Daily

    Categories

    Collapse

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by ImmigrationDaily, 12-09-2019, 11:24 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 likes
    Last Post ImmigrationDaily  
    Started by ImmigrationDaily, 12-06-2019, 01:45 PM
    0 responses
    43 views
    0 likes
    Last Post ImmigrationDaily  
    Started by ImmigrationDaily, 12-05-2019, 04:12 PM
    0 responses
    79 views
    0 likes
    Last Post ImmigrationDaily  
    Started by ImmigrationDaily, 12-04-2019, 10:59 AM
    0 responses
    190 views
    0 likes
    Last Post ImmigrationDaily  
    Started by ImmigrationDaily, 12-03-2019, 10:52 AM
    0 responses
    188 views
    0 likes
    Last Post ImmigrationDaily  
    Started by ImmigrationDaily, 12-03-2019, 10:42 AM
    0 responses
    49 views
    0 likes
    Last Post ImmigrationDaily  


    Working...
    X