Most of the prospective H-1B employees and H-1B employers begin with either of the following two thoughts: “I would like to work in the U.S. using an H-1B visa, but am not sure if I qualify” or “I want to hire a foreign worker but not sure if the individual qualifies for an H-1B visa.”

In order to successfully obtain an H-1B visa, it is mandatory that not only the prospective H-1B employee but both the proffered position and prospective employee should qualify for the H-1B visa. This article will explore the importance of educational and/or experience evaluations, and explain certain precautions that an employer and/or prospective H-1B employee can take in order to avoid a potential Request for Evidence (RFE) and/or denial of the H-1B nonimmigrant petition.

For a proffered H-1B position to qualify for an H-1B visa, it must be in a “Specialty Occupation”. A specialty occupation is an occupation that requires: (1) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; and (2) attainment of a bachelor’s or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. Additionally, with regard to a prospective H-1B employee, regulations specify that the individual must possess either a United States baccalaureate (or its equivalent) or higher degree required by the specialty occupation from an accredited college or university OR hold an unrestricted state license, registration or certification which authorizes the prospective H-1B employee to fully practice the specialty occupation. Also, having education, specialized training, and/or “progressively responsible experience” that is equivalent to completion of a United States baccalaureate or higher degree in the specialty occupation, and having recognition of expertise in the specialty through progressively responsible positions directly related to the specialty could qualify the individual for an H-1B visa.

Employers should be mindful that if the beneficiary is educated outside the U.S., the employer will be required to determine whether the foreign education is equivalent to a United States baccalaureate or higher degree.

It is extremely important to understand that just because the degree says it is a bachelor’s degree does not necessarily mean that it is equivalent to a United States bachelor’s degree. For example, India (and other countries throughout the world) has both three and four-year bachelor’s degrees. Generally (but not always), the three-year degrees are equivalent to three years of undergraduate coursework at a U.S. institution of higher learning. Four-year degrees from India can usually be considered equivalent to a U.S. bachelor’s degree.

Also worth highlighting is that a general degree may not qualify an individual for an H-1B visa because of the absence of specialized experience as there must be a showing of a degree in a “specialized field”. However, in these kinds of situations, when a beneficiary’s degree is not directly related to the proffered position, it is important to evaluate the beneficiary’s academic course work related to the occupation to determine his/her qualifications.

Consider, for example, the case of a prospective beneficiary for an H-1B petition for the position of Accountant who holds a degree in Business Administration. Generally, a degree in Business Administration may not satisfy the requirement that the prospective H-1B Beneficiary have a degree in a specialty occupation because of the general, non-specific nature of the coursework required for this type of degree. The prospective H-1B Beneficiary may, however, have taken a significant number of accounting courses while obtaining his/her degree in Business Administration. These accounting courses may be presented as part of the legal argument that demonstrates that the Business Degree in question may be sufficient to establish that the alien has the required education in a “specialty” occupation for H-1B purposes.

Note that an evaluation of education by a credentials evaluation service, which specializes in evaluating foreign education credential, is “advisory” only. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) do not endorse or recommend any particular educational or experiential evaluators. It is important to note that some evaluators specialize in “educational” equivalency evaluations while some specialize in “experience” evaluations. In addition, there are some organizations that perform combined “educational and experience evaluations”.

When seeking guidance with regard to educational or experience equivalency there are many services available that can assist the employer or the prospective H-1B employee. Very important for H-1B employers and employees to know is that equivalency evaluations must come from a reliable credentials evaluation services which specialize in evaluating foreign education and/or experiential credentials. If the equivalency evaluation is not issued by a reliable credentials evaluation service, USCIS, in past, has issued RFE questioning the reliability of the credentials evaluation. To avoid such RFEs, it is important to make sure that the organization or service that performs the pure “educational” equivalency evaluation should: (1) Consider formal education only, not practical experience; (2) State if the collegiate training was post-secondary education, (i.e., whether the applicant completed the U.S. equivalent of high school before entering college); (3) Provide a detailed explanation of the material evaluated rather than a simple concluding statement; and, (4) Briefly state the qualifications and experience of the evaluator providing the opinion.

Even if the prospective H-1B Beneficiary does not hold a bachelor’s degree or its equivalent in a specific area of study required by the proffered position, she or he may qualify for an H-1B visa. The prospective H-1B Beneficiary’s education, specialized training, and/or progressively responsible experience may be recognized as equivalent to a baccalaureate degree (commonly referred as the “educational and experience evaluation”) provided the H-1B Beneficiary has knowledge, competence, and practice in the specialty occupation that has been determined to be equal to a baccalaureate or higher degree.

The educational and experience evaluation may be deemed to be equal to a U.S. baccalaureate or higher degree through one or more of the following factors: (A) An evaluation from an official who has authority to grant college-level credit for training and/or experience in the specialty at an accredited college or university which has a program for granting such credit based on an individual’s training and/or work experience; (B) The results of recognized college-level equivalency examinations or special credit programs, such as the College Level Examination Program (CLEP) or Program on Non-collegiate Sponsored Instruction (PONSI); (C) An evaluation of education by a reliable credentials evaluation service which specializes in evaluating foreign education credentials; (D) Evidence of certification or registration from a nationally-recognized professional association or society for the specialty that is known to grant certification or registration to persons in the occupational specialty who have achieved a certain level of competence in the specialty; (E) A determination by USCIS that the equivalent of the degree required has been acquired through a combination of education, specialized training and/or work experience and that the beneficiary has also achieved recognition of expertise in a specialty occupation as a result of such training and experience.

With regard to the first option (evaluation from an official who has authority to grant college-level credit), USCIS’s Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) clarifies that an official must be “formally involved with the college or university’s official program for granting credit based on training and/or experience to have the required authority and expertise to make such evaluations.”

When proving equivalency through “education and experience”, the equivalency evaluator needs to be cognizant of the fact that: the beneficiary’s training and/or work experience includes the theoretical and practical application of specialized knowledge required by the specialty; and, the claimed experience was gained while working with peers, supervisors, and/or subordinates who have a degree or equivalent in the specialty.

The USCIS regulations set forth a handy rule-of-thumb equivalency protocol or methodology called the “3-to-1 rule”. The 3-to-1 rule states that a bachelor’s degree equivalency can be demonstrated through a combination of education, specialized training, and/or work experience. Simply put, three years of specialized training and/or progressively-responsible related work experience must be demonstrated for each year of college-level academic training the prospective H-1B Beneficiary lacks.

Further, as to the last option (when USCIS itself makes the determination regarding whether the Beneficiary holds an equivalent of the bachelor’s degree), It must be clearly demonstrated that the alien's training and/or work experience included the theoretical and practical application of specialized knowledge required by the specialty occupation; that the alien's experience was gained while working with peers, supervisors, or subordinates who have a degree or its equivalent in the specialty occupation; and that the alien has recognition of expertise in the specialty evidenced by at least one type of documentation such as: (1) Recognition of expertise in the specialty occupation by at least two recognized authorities in the same specialty occupation; (2) Membership in a recognized foreign or U.S. association or society in the specialty occupation; (3) Published material by or about the alien in professional publications, trade journals, or major newspapers; (4) Licensure or registration to practice the specialty occupation in a foreign country; or, (5) Achievements which a recognized authority has determined to be significant contributions to the field of the specialty occupation.

In conclusion, provided the proffered job qualifies as a specialty occupation, it is imperative to show that the prospective H-1B Beneficiary holds either a U.S. baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent. The equivalency can be shown through educational evaluation or through experience and educational evaluation. In some cases, a pure experience equivalency evaluation may be possible. If the employer submits an educational equivalency, it must come from a reliable credentials evaluation service which specializes in evaluating foreign education credentials. The baccalaureate or higher degree equivalency through educational and experience evaluation can be proved through one or more of the above-mentioned five (5) options. Finally, there are additional requirements that the prospective H-1B Beneficiary needs to satisfy if the employer wants USCIS to makes its own determination about whether the H-1B hopeful holds an equivalent of a U.S. bachelor’s degree or higher degree required by the specialty occupation.

Reprinted with permission.

About The Author

Michael Phulwani Michael Phulwani, Esq. is admitted to practice law in India, New York and New Jersey. He has been practicing law for about 39 years in the field of Immigration and Nationality Law. He is admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, and India. He maintains law office in Maywood New Jersey, and in Mumbai India.. He has successfully handled many complex immigration matters with the Immigration and Naturalization Service and consular processing cases at American Consulates abroad especially consular posts in India. Michael Phulwani is the author of 'Guide to U.S. Visas' and numerous articles published in various ethnic newspapers and other publications in the U.S. and abroad such as News India, India Tribune and Gujarat Times. He has also co-authored a series of articles on American Consulates in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh published in "The Visa Processing Guide" by American Immigration Lawyers Association.

David Nachman David Nachman, Esq. is the founder and one of the Managing Attorneys in the Nachman Phulwani Zimovcak (NPZ) Law Group, P.C., a pre-eminent International Immigration and Nationality Law Firm dedicated to providing a wide array of business and family immigration law services for skilled U.S.- and Canada-bound workers. Attorney Nachman and fellow lawyers contributed to landmark decisions in such cases as Berger v. Berger and Woolley v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. The NPZ Law Group is an International Immigration Law Firm with offices in NJ and NY. The Firm has affiliated offices in Canada and India. The Firm specializes in providing assistance with waivers, removal defense, asylum, PERM, immigrant (Green Card) and various nonimmigrant visas, and immigration compliance matters for employers and employees and their families. Immigration professionals in NPZ Law Group speak many foreign languages including, but not limited to: Spanish, French, Japanese, Korean, Tamil, Hindi, Gujarati, Nepalese, Slovak, Czech, Russian, Polish, Tagalog, Hebrew, Chinese, German and English.

Rabindra Singh Rabindra K. Singh, Esq. (Rabi) is an Associate Attorney in the Nachman Phulwani Zimovcak (NPZ) Law Group. Rabi's work focuses on complex employment and family-based immigration matters. He frequently assists clients in obtaining investor-based visas and is an expert in preparing various types of waiver applications. Additionally, he has gained an in-depth expertise in the worksite enforcement area by successfully representing clients of all sizes. Adept in submitting Motion to Reopen and/or Reconsider to USCIS for reviewing adverse decisions, Rabi frequently files Appeals to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). An avid writer, he writes for both print and electronic media. Rabi’s articles have appeared in the prestigious New Jersey Law Journal and Law360. Further, he writes weekly articles for various ethnic Indian newspapers published from New York, New Jersey and Chicago. Rabi can be contacted at:

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.